Skip to content

· Private foundation

Plunkett Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$373kEducation$60kPhilanthropy$41kEnvironment$19kHealth$7kRecreation & Sports$5kFood & Nutrition$5kPublic Benefit$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$1,100
Median grant
4
States reached
$191k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATRE$19,950
FILLING IN THE BLANK$5,000
VAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION$1,100
CENTRAL HICKORY COUNTY FIRE & RESCUE$1,000
ROTARY CLUB OF MILWAUKEE$350
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FILLING IN THE BLANK: $5k → 9%WOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER MILWAUKEE: $10k → 17%WOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER MILWAUKEE: $10k → 17%WOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER MILWAUKEE: $10k → 17%WOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER MILWAUKEE: $10k → 17%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $270 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
TN
SC
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$534k · 26 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
43

Total granted

$534k
$53k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+27%

Still filing today

62%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $228k · revenue +91%
  • FLORENTINE OPERA COMPANY INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $67k · revenue +38%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2020 · $50k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • M
    MPTV
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • Cornell Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +49%
  • CL
    CEDAR LAKE YACHT CLUB
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -52%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Milwaukee Women Inc

Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

Education
2
Radio Milwaukee Inc

To reach a new generation of radio listeners on air, online and in the community with a compelling selection of music and public affairs programming. the corporation celebrates milwaukee music, arts, heritage, and culture by supporting and…

Arts & Culture
3
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
4
Uwm Research Foundation Inc

Support research and innovation at the university of wisconsin - milwaukee by providing reserach funding, entrepreneurship support, and by engaging in corporate partnering activities to that end.

Community Improvement
5
The Uwm Real Estate Foundation Inc

To partner with the public and private sectors to develop and hold real estate for the benefit of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee. the uwm real estate foundation, inc. holdings may include any properties that advance the mission of…

Housing & Shelter
6
Milwaukee Public Theatre Inc

Making the arts accessible to all

—
7
Milwaukee Public Museum Endowment Fund

Supporting the charitable, scientific and educational purposes of the milwaukee public museum.

—
8
Wisconsin Chamber Orchestra Inc

Strengthen communities by providing high-quality and innovative artistic experiences that entertain, inspire, and unite diverse audiences.

Arts & Culture
9
Madison Opera Inc

The mission of madison opera is to produce operas of the highest artistic standards.

Arts & Culture
10
Wisconsin Maritime Museum Inc

The wisconsin maritime museum connects all people with wisconsin's waterways, by engaging and educating the public about wisconsin's maritime history, wisconsin's world war ii submarines, uss cobia, and the great lakes. the wisconsin…

Arts & Culture
11
Milwaukee Institute of Art & Design Inc

The milwaukee institute of art and design's mission is to ignite curious minds through art, design and service. we value courage to seek our own path, integrity to pursue our lives and work with meaning, kindness to thoughtfully engage…

—
12
Milwaukee World Festival Inc

The corporation shall be a civic organization not organized for profit but operated exclusively for charitable and educational purposes including in furtherance thereof, the production of an annual festival in the milwaukee metropolitan…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Milwaukee Art Museum Inc; the most unlike its peers is National Geographic Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/44
Grantees still filing
34/44
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC: $227,920 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INCFLORENTINE OPERA COMPANY INC: $66,950 · Arts & CultureFLORENTINE OPERA COMPANY INCMILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $25,500 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC+13 more: $31,395 · Arts & Culture+13 moreIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipien…BOERNER BOTANICAL GARDENS: $10,985 · OtherBOERNER BOTANICAL GARDENSMPTV: $10,000 · OtherMPTVIndividual grant recipient: $5,700 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $5,100 · OtherCEDAR LAKE YACHT CLUB: $5,000 · Other+36 more: $45,785 · Other+36 moreUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY…Cornell University: $5,000 · EducationCornell Un…+5 more: $2,075 · EducationWOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesFILLING IN THE BLANKS INC: $5,000 · Human Services+1 more: $270 · Human ServicesRIVEREDGE NATURE CENTER INC: $2,880 · EnvironmentURBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC: $2,500 · EnvironmentST MARYS RIVERKEEPER INC: $500 · EnvironmentVAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION: $3,675 · Community ImprovementThe Guest House of Milwaukee Inc: $1,000 · Housing & Shelter
Arts & Culture$351,765Other$132,570Education$57,075Human Services$45,270Environment$5,880Community Improvement$3,675Housing & Shelter$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC: $227,920 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetFLORENTINE OPERA COMPANY INC: $66,950 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC: $40,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetMILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $25,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC: $5,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCEDAR LAKE YACHT CLUB: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $4,900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC: $4,620 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF MILWAUKEE: $4,385 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetVAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION: $3,675 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRIVEREDGE NATURE CENTER INC: $2,880 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPRESENT MUSIC INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMILWAUKEE FILM INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetURBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRENAISSANCE THEATERWORKS INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMATHER HOMESTEAD FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMUSEUM OF WISCONSIN ART INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEAA AVIATION FOUNDATION INC: $1,825 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE POSSIBLE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Guest House of Milwaukee Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRediscover: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCREATE WISCONSIN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetST MARYS RIVERKEEPER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE UWM FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE NAVIGATORS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S OUTING ASSOCIATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRCM COMMUNITY FUND: $400 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetVAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $275 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC: $270 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRANKLY MUSIC INC: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMALAIKA EARLY LEARNING CENTER: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC ↗
  • Who funds FLORENTINE OPERA COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds CEDAR LAKE YACHT CLUB ↗
  • Who funds FILLING IN THE BLANKS INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF MILWAUKEE ↗
  • Who funds VAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RIVEREDGE NATURE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PRESENT MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE FILM INC ↗
  • Who funds URBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds RENAISSANCE THEATERWORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds MATHER HOMESTEAD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF WISCONSIN ART INC ↗
  • Who funds Optimist Theatre ↗
  • Who funds EAA AVIATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE POSSIBLE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Herbert H Kohl Charities IncWI33.5× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Gardner Foundation · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Ralph Evinrude Foundation Inc · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Bert L and Patricia S Steigleder Charitable · Richard and Ethel Herzfeld Foundation Inc · National Center for Housing Management Inc · Peck Foundation Milwaukee Ltd

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Plunkett Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Plunkett Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Mather Homestead Foundation: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Plunkett Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Plunkett Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Plunkett Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph