Skip to content

· Public charity

Plumbing-Heating-Cooling Contractors of MA Inc

To provide education and dissemination of knowledge pertaining to the plumbing-heating-cooling industry.

$95k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Human Services$148kHealth$49kEducation$34kHousing & Shelter$13kRecreation & Sports$10kYouth Development$10k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $51,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $95,479 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $44,479 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Smykil Family Foundation$10,000
New Life Furniture Bank$10,000
UCT Hopefuls Inc$10,000
Golf Fights Cancer$10,000
Old Colony YMCA Plymouth$10,000
PHCC National Association$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $133k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 26% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%22 Mohawks Corps: $10k → 7%Old Colony YMCA Plymouth: $10k → 8%Nam Knights: $10k → 8%ASCENTRIA CARE ALLIANCE INC: $5k → 11%Lustgarten Foundation: $10k → 6%22MOHAWKS CORPS: $9k → 7%Compassionate Care ALSFalmouth: $10k → 8%ARC of Greater Brockton: $10k → 8%My Brother's Keeper: $10k → 11%Tommy's Place Foundation Inc: $10k → 8%Larkin Motors Foundation: $10k → 8%DIGNITY MATTERS INC: $10k → 8%TOMMY'S PLACE FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 7%LARKIN MOTORS FOUNDATION: $9k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$134k · 5 repeat orgs$181k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +103% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
13

Total granted

$134k
$130k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+103%
+35%

Still filing today

80%
85%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $51k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    Tommy's Place Foundation Inc
    2× · 2021–2023 · $20k · revenue +67%
  • LM
    LARKIN MOTORS FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $19k · revenue +103% · 64% of their budget
  • 2M
    22 MOHAWKS CORP
    2× · 2022–2023 · $19k · revenue +351%

Funded once

  • RC
    ROTARY CLUB OF NATICK - EMBRACE A FAMILY
    one grant, 2019 · $13k
  • WL
    WOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $13k · revenue +221%
  • NK
    NAM KNIGHTS OF AMERICA MC BOSTON CHAPTER
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -64% · 62% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Veterans Inc

Veterans inc.'s mission is to end homelessness among veterans by helping veterans regain control of their lives. we believe that all veterans have earned respect and gratitude from our nation. this belief is translated into the philosophy…

Community Improvement
2
Disabled American Veterans Department of Massachusetts Inc

To provide services to individuals who were disabled due to or during their military service.

—
3
Brighton Marine Inc

Brighton marine provides military and veteran families with comprehensive healthcare, supportive housing and wraparound services to veterans and their families throughout the east coast.

Health
4
Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program Inc

The mission of the boston health care for the homeless program (bhchp) is to provide or assure access to the highest quality health care for all individuals and families experiencing homelessness in our community.

Human Services
5
Ocean State Cancer Crushers
—
6
Leander House Inc

Assist people with disabilities

Health
7
Lifestream Inc

Lifestream, inc. (the organization") provides community-based services that support individuals in attaining greater independence, promising opportunities, and lives that are meaningful and fulfilling on their own terms.

Health
8
Massachusetts Fair Housing Center Inc

Mfhc is committed to ending systemic housing discrimination and creating inclusive communities through education, outreach, advocacy, housing counseling and enforcement.

Housing & Shelter
9
The Mccourt Foundation Inc

Striving to help cure neurological diseases, while empowering communities to build a healthier world.

Philanthropy
10
Victory Human Services Inc

Provide specialized services to assist individuals and their families in overcoming the challenges of developmental disabilities, mental illness, and medical conditions.

Health
11
The Hug Foundation of Ma Inc

To provide families financial support to help deal with unexpected costs related to family illnesses

Philanthropy
12
Work Incorporated

It is the mission of work,inc. to ensure that all individuals with disabilities have the ability to grow, the right to make choices, access to education, and the opportunity to participate in community life via meaningful work.

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Women's Lunch Place Inc; the most unlike its peers is Marc Lustgarten Pancreatic Cancer Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
13/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Tommy's Place Foundation Inc: $20,000 · Human ServicesTommy's Place Foundation IncLARKIN MOTORS FOUNDATION INC: $19,000 · Human ServicesLARKIN MOTORS FOUNDATION INC22 MOHAWKS CORP: $19,000 · Human Services22 MOHAWKS CORPNAM KNIGHTS OF AMERICA MC BOSTON CHAPTER: $10,000 · Human ServicesNAM KNIGHTS OF AMERICA MC BOSTON CHAPTERMy Brothers Keeper Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesMy Brothers Keeper IncMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATIONBROCKTON AREA ARC INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesBROCKTON AREA ARC INCDignity Matters Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesDignity Matters IncOLD COLONY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesOLD COLONY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION IN…Compassionate Care ALS Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesCompassionate Care ALS IncASCENTRIA CARE ALLIANCE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesHUGS FOR MITO INC: $42,000 · OtherHUGS FOR MITO INCROTARY CLUB OF NATICK - EMBRACE A FAMILY: $13,000 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF NATICK - EMBRACE …WOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE INC: $13,000 · OtherWOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE INCSmykil Family Foundation: $10,000 · OtherSmykil Family FoundationNEW HAMPSHIRE 4-H ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · OtherNEW HAMPSHIRE 4-H ASSOCIATION+1 more: $1,000 · OtherPHCC EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $34,000 · Community ImprovementPHCC EDUCATI…FAMILIES OF SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY DBA CURE SMA: $10,000 · HealthTHE MEGAN HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 · HealthGOLF FIGHTS CANCER INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyNEW LIFE FURNITURE BANK OF MA INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE PLAY BRIGADE INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsUCT Hopefuls Inc: $10,000 · Education
Human Services$133,000Other$89,000Community Improvement$34,000Health$19,000Philanthropy$10,000Housing & Shelter$10,000Recreation & Sports$10,000Education$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPHCC EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $34,000 over 5y, 10% of budgetTommy's Place Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetLARKIN MOTORS FOUNDATION INC: $19,000 over 2y, 64% of budget22 MOHAWKS CORP: $19,000 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetWOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE INC: $13,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNAM KNIGHTS OF AMERICA MC BOSTON CHAPTER: $10,000 over 1y, 62% of budgetNEW LIFE FURNITURE BANK OF MA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMy Brothers Keeper Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDignity Matters Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE PLAY BRIGADE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetUCT Hopefuls Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 92% of budgetFAMILIES OF SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY DBA CURE SMA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOLD COLONY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCompassionate Care ALS Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE MEGAN HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetASCENTRIA CARE ALLIANCE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eastern Bank FoundationMA16.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Plumbing-Heating-Cooling Contractors of MA Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Plumbing-Heating-Cooling Contractors of MA Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 15%
  • Brockton Area Arc Inc: 91% of income from government
  • The Megan House Foundation Inc: 15% of income from government
  • 22 Mohawks Corp: 10% of income from government
  • Women's Lunch Place Inc: 8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Plumbing-Heating-Cooling Contractors of MA’s filings →

More from the funding graph