· Public charity
Play on Shakespeare
PLAY ON SHAKESPEARE has been organized to enhance the understanding of shakespeare's plays in performance for theatre professionals, students, and audiences by engaging with contemporary translations and adaptations.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 18 grants below total $1,459,300 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,814,037 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $354,737 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $16k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $98k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $775k
- $250k+2 grants · $570k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NATIONAL ASIAN AMERICAN THEATRE COMPANY CO INC | $320,000 |
| IDAHO SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC | $250,000 |
| MAGIC THEATRE INC | $179,000 |
| PORTLAND CENTER STAGE | $169,000 |
| THE ACTING COMPANY | $125,000 |
| STUDIO ACTING CONSERVATORY INC | $80,000 |
| AMERICAN CONSERVATORY THEATER | $58,300 |
| PORTLAND SHAKESPEARE PROJECT | $56,500 |
| HERO THEATRE INC | $55,000 |
| AFRICAN-AMERICAN SHAKESPEARE COMPANY | $52,500 |
| SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL OF DALLAS | $35,000 |
| ASHLAND NEW PLAYS FESTIVAL | $15,000 |
| THE DUBOIS FAMILY LLC | $15,000 |
| BLACK OPS THEATRE COMPANY | $13,000 |
| THEATRE COMMUNICATIONS GROUP | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 64% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $200k on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: PROGRAM SERVICES
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $502k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NANational Asian American Theatre Company2× · 2023–2024 · $645k · revenue +47% · 48% of their budget
- MTMAGIC THEATRE INC4× · 2021–2024 · $267k · revenue +83%
- PSPortland Shakespeare Project3× · 2022–2024 · $147k · revenue +19% · 77% of their budget
Funded once
- CSCALIFORNIA SHAKESPEARE THEATERone grant, 2022 · $170k · revenue -9%
HUNTINGTON THEATRE CO INCone grant, 2022 · $60k · revenue -8%- HPHOLMES PRODUCTIONSone grant, 2023 · $45k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Develop recognition of international theater
Titan theatre company is committed to breathing new life and clarity into classical works of theatre, exploring new and contemporary language plays, and delivering adventurous and visceral theatrical experiences for our audiences and…
The Directors Company is an award-winning not-for-profit theatre company with an extraordinary record in its mission to develop and produce groundbreaking new plays and musicals initiated and generated by outstanding directorial talent,…
The mission of theatre for a new audience is to develop and vitalize the performance and study of shakespeare and classic drama. the theatre is dedicated to the language and ideas of writers - to a dialogue over centuries between…
Classical Theatre Company is dedicated to boldly re-envisioning classical drama on the stage, in the community, and in the classroom through engaging and enlightening plays that bring them new life and relevance while maintaining the…
We are a theatre company. We provide opportunities for local theatre artists and high quality productions for the public.
Organization mission: act is a contemporary theatre where artistic ambition and civic engagement unite. organization vision: act envisions a world where the power of theatre expands our collective understanding of community and our own…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is African-American Shakespeare Company and the most unlike its peers is Dubois Family Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds National Asian American Theatre Company ↗
- Who funds MAGIC THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds IDAHO SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC ↗
- Who funds PORTLAND CENTER STAGE ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA SHAKESPEARE THEATER ↗
- Who funds Portland Shakespeare Project ↗
- Who funds GROUP I ACTING COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds THE STUDIO ACTING CONSERVATORY INC ↗
- Who funds Hero Theatre Inc ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN-AMERICAN SHAKESPEARE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds ACTORS' SHAKESPEARE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds The Shakespeare Festival of Dallas dba Shakespeare Dallas ↗
- Who funds CHAGRIN FOUNDATION FOR ARTS & CULTURE ↗
- Who funds HUNTINGTON THEATRE CO INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CONSERVATORY THEATRE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PRAGUE SHAKESPEARE COMPANY AMERICA ↗
- Who funds WOMENS THEATRE FESTIVAL ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK LIVE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds SHAKESPEARE-SAN FRANCISCO ↗
- Who funds GREAT LAKES THEATER FESTIVAL INC ↗
- Who funds DEPAUL UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE CLASSICAL THEATRE OF HARLEM INC ↗
- Who funds Perseverance Theatre Incorporated ↗
- Who funds THEATER BREAKING THROUGH BARRIERS CORP ↗
- Who funds CARA MIA THEATRE CO ↗
- Who funds THE THEATRE AT BOSTON COURT ↗
- Who funds SHAKESPEARE THEATRE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds BREAKING WAVE THEATRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds ROYAL SHAKESPEARE COMPANY AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds RAMAPO COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DUBOIS FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Ashland New Plays Festival ↗
- Who funds BLACK THEATRE UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds BLESSED UNREST THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF THE ARTS PROGRAM SUPPORT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THEATRE COMMUNICATIONS GROUP INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Shubert Foundation Inc · Arts Midwest Incorporated · The Andrew W Mellon Foundation · Theater League Inc · The Howard Gilman Foundation Inc · Theatre Communications Group Inc · Jkw Foundation Tr Ua 092597 · Axe-Houghton Foundation · The Sheri and Les Biller Family Foundation · The Rock Foundation · Booth Ferris Foundation Xxxxx4008 · Mid Atlantic Arts Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Play on Shakespeare funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Actors' Shakespeare Project — 6% of income from government
- Huntington Theatre Co Inc — 4% of income from government
- Ashland New Plays Festival — 2% of income from government
- Ramapo College Foundation — 1% of income from government
- Portland Center Stage — 1% of income from government
- Portland State University Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Play on Shakespeare?
Find your warmest path to Play on Shakespeare through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.