· Private foundation
Planters Telecommunications Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 92% of PLANTERS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $30k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $110k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EFFINGHAM COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION | $55,000 |
| SCREVEN COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION | $55,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $9,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $7,500 |
| OGEECHEE TECH FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| BLUE SKY ACRES | $5,000 |
| SCREVEN COUNTY LIVESTOCK ASSOCIATION INC | $2,000 |
| AMIKIDS - SAVANNAH RIVER | $1,000 |
| SCREVEN COUNTY 4-H | $830 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 37% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
20 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SCScreven Christian Academy Inc3× · 2017–2021 · $29k · revenue +148%
- CACITIZENS AGAINST VIOLENCE INC2× · 2019–2020 · $20k · revenue +8%
- OTOGEECHEE TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC4× · 2017–2020 · $20k · revenue +45%
Funded once
- VPVETERANS PARK OF EFFINGHAM COUNTY INCone grant, 2021 · $25k
- EHEFFINGHAM HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +151%
- UWUNITED WAY OF COASTAL EMPIRE EFFINGHAMone grant, 2023 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to serve individuals and families in the csra through programs designed to build healthy spirit, mind, and body, reflecting the values of the judeo-christian tradition while maintaining respect for all people.
The mission of Georgia 4-H is to assist youth in acquiring knowledge, developing life skills, and forming attitudes that will enable them to become self-directing, productive and contributing members of society. This mission is…
Orgze and admin 4-h pgrms morgan cty,ga
to organize and administer 4-H, Agricultural and Natural Resource, and Family and Consumer Science programming in Wilkes County, Georgia
To provide direct services to the community for the advancement and development of girls and young women.
To assist youth in acquiring knowledge, developing life skills, and formating attitudes that will enable them to become self-directing, productive, and contributing members of society. the mission is accomplished through "hands on"…
To organize, administer, and oversee 4-H, Agriculture, and Family and Consumer Science programs in Bulloch County, Georgia
The gordon youth science and technology center (gystc) is a regional center dedicated to promoting student interest and achievement in science and mathematics. we aim to stimulate a child's interest from an early age to enjoy, not fear,…
To organize and administer 4-h programs in wilcox county, georgia.
To provide science enrichment and interactive educational programs and exhibits to supplement and enhance the science education of children and adults of spartanburg county sc.
To organize and administer 4h, agriculture, and family and consumer science programs in colquitt county georgia.
To organize and administer 4-h, agriculture and natural resources, & family and consumer sciences programs in bleckley county, georgia.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ogeechee Technical College Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hawk Enrichment Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Screven Christian Academy Inc ↗
- Who funds CITIZENS AGAINST VIOLENCE INC ↗
- Who funds OGEECHEE TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SCREVEN COUNTY LIVESTOCK ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF SCREVEN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF COASTAL GEORGIA INC ↗
- Who funds EFFINGHAM HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BLUE SKY ACRES INC ↗
- Who funds PEACE OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF COASTAL GEORGIA INC ↗
- Who funds EFFINGHAM COMMUNITY ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds Hawk Enrichment Center ↗
- Who funds SCREVEN COUNTY EXTENSION 4-H ↗
- Who funds COASTAL GEORGIA COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds LOWCOUNTRY DOWN SYNDROME SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds SAVANNAH RIVERKEEPER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Planters Telecommunications Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Planters Telecommunications Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Planters Telecommunications Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.