Skip to content

· Public charity

Planned Parenthood Advocates of Arizona

PLANNED PARENTHOOD ADVOCATES OF ARIZONA is a non-partisan membership organization whose purpose is to protect and promote sexual and reproductive health and rights in arizona by educating voters, public officals and candidates for public office.

$500k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Public Benefit$860kCivil Rights$170kHuman Services$35kEducation$5k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$678k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$500,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN AMERICA: $25k → 11%LUCHA: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

32%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$340k · 5 repeat orgs$730k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
12

Total granted

$340k
$230k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-23%
+25%

Still filing today

60%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Civil RightsHuman ServicesArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AW
    ARIZONA WINS
    2× · 2018–2019 · $120k · revenue -23%
  • AD
    ARIZONA DEMOCRATIC PARTY
    3× · 2019–2021 · $120k
  • AF
    ALBA FUND
    2× · 2020–2022 · $50k

Funded once

  • AF
    AZ FOR ABORTION ACCESS PAC
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
  • MIJENTE SUPPORT COMMITTEE
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +25%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Solutions for an Independent Arizona

Organization mission solutions for an independent arizona envisions an arizona addresses its most pressing issues. independent arizona will identify, unite, and engage voters who want to elect people who will find common ground to serve…

Civil Rights
2
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
3
Aclu Foundation of Arizona

The mission of the aclu foundation of arizona is to defend and preserve, through litigation and public education, individual rights and freedoms guaranteed to all by the constitution and the laws of the united states and arizona.

Civil Rights
4
One Arizona

One arizonas mission is to increase civic participation among arizonans

Civil Rights
5
Advancing Az

Social advocacy and grassroots organization made up of arizonans calling on elected officials to put the issues of arizonans first-to protect our access to affordable health care, to build an economy that supports arizona families, and…

—
6
Rural Arizona Action

At rural arizona action, we seek to create more equitable and just systems through advocacy, accountability, and leadership training in rural arizona communities.

Civil Rights
7
Arizona Advocacy Network

The arizona advocacy network secures electoral justice, political rights, and full civic participation especially for the underrepresented and marginalized constituencies, to achieve government for the people, not corporations.

Civil Rights
8
Pro-Choice Arizona

Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…

Health
9
Our Voice Our Vote Arizona

Our voice our vote arizona engages in community organizing, leadership development, and civic participation efforts. the organization focuses on voter registration, education, and engagement to strengthen communities and encourage active…

Civil Rights
10
Arizona Center for Empowerment

Empowering arizonas low to moderate income families, especially members of the large and diverse latino and immigrant communities, to overcome effects of social and economic injustice and create opportunities and benefits for their…

Civil Rights
11
Opportunity Arizona

Opportunity arizona is an issue advocacy organization whose mission is to grow more opportunities and improve the quality of life for hard-working arizonans.

Civil Rights
12
Progress Arizona

Progress arizona is an arizona nonprofit corporation located in phoenix, arizona. progress arizona is an organization founded in 2018 to educate the public about key policy issues using digital organizing and communications.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save Our Schools Arizona; the most unlike its peers is Rural Arizona Engagement. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $500,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientARIZONA DEMOCRATIC PARTY: $120,000 · OtherARIZONA DEMOCRATIC PARTYAZ FOR ABORTION ACCESS PAC: $100,000 · OtherAZ FOR ABORTION ACCESS PACALBA FUND: $50,000 · OtherALBA FUND+8 more: $90,000 · Other+8 moreARIZONA WINS: $120,000 · Civil RightsARIZONA WINSARIZONANS FOR BETTER HEALTHCARE: $15,000 · Civil RightsARIZONANS FOR B…RURAL ARIZONA ENGAGEMENT: $10,000 · Civil RightsRURAL ARIZONA E…LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA: $35,000 · Human ServicesMIJENTE SUPPORT COMMITTEE: $25,000 · Arts & CultureSAVE OUR SCHOOLS ARIZONA: $5,000 · Community Improvement
Other$860,000Civil Rights$145,000Human Services$35,000Arts & Culture$25,000Community Improvement$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetARIZONA WINS: $120,000 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetLIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA: $35,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetMIJENTE SUPPORT COMMITTEE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF ARIZONA: $15,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetARIZONANS FOR BETTER HEALTHCARE: $15,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetRURAL ARIZONA ENGAGEMENT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTIDES ADVOCACY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE OUR SCHOOLS ARIZONA: $5,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ARIZONA WINS ↗
  • Who funds LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds MIJENTE SUPPORT COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONANS FOR BETTER HEALTHCARE ↗
  • Who funds RURAL ARIZONA ENGAGEMENT ↗
  • Who funds TIDES ADVOCACY ↗
  • Who funds SAVE OUR SCHOOLS ARIZONA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Grove Action FundCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Grove Action Fund · All Hands on Deck Network Inc · Sixteen Thirty Fund · New Venture Fund · Tides Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Planned Parenthood Advocates of Arizona funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Planned Parenthood Advocates of Arizona. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Planned Parenthood Advocates of Arizona’s filings →

    More from the funding graph