Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

Pennsylvania · Public charity

Pittsburgh Indian Community and Friends

Pittsburgh Indian Community and Friends (PICAF), EIN 47-1310070, is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization through the Road Runners Club of America group exemption status (Group Exemption #2702) with IRS. The primary mission was for the Indian Community and their friends in the Greater Pittsburgh region to give back to the community where we…

$184k
Granted FY2020
4
Itemized grants FY2020
4
Organizations funded FY2020
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2020
$180k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2020
$25,000
Largest grant, FY2020
$105,000
States reached, FY2020
1
Total assets, FY2020
$58k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2020, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Greater Pittsburgh Community Food Bank$105,00010%
Bible Center Church Inc$25,0001n/a
Ruths Way Inc$25,000116%
The Citizen Science Lab$25,00013%

Compare Pittsburgh Indian Community and Friends with peer funders

About Pittsburgh Indian Community and Friends

How much does Pittsburgh Indian Community and Friends give?
Pittsburgh Indian Community and Friends reported 4 itemized grants totaling $180,000, out of $183,885 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2020 IRS filing.
What does Pittsburgh Indian Community and Friends fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2020, its largest causes are Food & Nutrition (58%), Youth Development (14%), Science & Tech (14%).
Who are Pittsburgh Indian Community and Friends's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2020: Greater Pittsburgh Community Food Bank ($105k), Bible Center Church Inc ($25k), Ruths Way Inc ($25k).
Where is Pittsburgh Indian Community and Friends based?
Pittsburgh Indian Community and Friends is based in PA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 4 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $7k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2020, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Pittsburgh Indian Community and Friends’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home