Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Pine Bar Cornerstone Foundation Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$116k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Animals$382kHealth$199kRecreation & Sports$53k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $79k
$8,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLLIE RESCUE OF THE CAROLINAS$25,000
MANES & MOTIONS THERAPEUTIC RIDING$18,500
JENNI'S RESCUE RANCH$15,000
PARTNERS FOR PROGRESS$10,550
LADAWN QUARTER HORSES THERAPEUTIC$10,000
SYA LONG EARS RESCUE$8,000
MISFIT ACRES INC$8,000
HIGH HOPES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC$7,500
NSBA$7,000
STONE ACRES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC$3,500
BRIGHT STAR STABLES$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $64k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%BRIGHT STAR STABLES: $3k → 14%BRIGHT STAR STABLES: $3k → 14%BRIGHT STAR STABLES: $3k → 14%BRIGHT STAR STABLES: $3k → 14%PARTNERS FOR PROGRESS: $11k → 8%PARTNERS FOR PROGRESS: $11k → 8%PARTNERS FOR PROGRESS: $11k → 8%PARTNERS FOR PROGRESS: $11k → 8%PARTNERS FOR PROGRESS: $11k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NH
MN
IL
CT
NC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$634k · 12 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
0

Total granted

$634k
$0

Still filing today

67%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JR
    JENNIS RESCUE RANCH
    5× · 2021–2025 · $75k · revenue +225%
  • PF
    PARTNERS FOR PROGRESS NFP
    5× · 2021–2025 · $53k · revenue +30%
  • HIGH HOPES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $45k · revenue +15%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Great Results Equine Assisted Therapies
    Health
    2
    Happy Trails Horse Rescue

    Happy Trails Horse Rescue, located in Bend, Oregon, is dedicated to the protection of horses and their quality of life, to be free from abuse, neglect, abandonment, slaughter, or early euthanasia without just cause. While we strive to…

    Animals
    3
    Swingin' D Horse Rescue
    Animals
    4
    Wings of Hope Therapeutic Riding Program Inc
    5
    Red Bucket Equine Rescue
    Animals
    6
    Healing Hearts Hooves and Paws Rescue

    rescue rehab retraining and rehoming for homeless and neglected equine and canine

    Animals
    7
    Veteran Equine Therapy Stables
    Public Benefit
    8
    Rainfall Ranch Rescue

    Equine rescue and rehabilitation

    Animals
    9
    Pride and Joy Rescue

    Our mission is to rehabilitate horses, restore their trust, and find them safe, and loving homes. The animals in our charge are vet, trained and either adopted out, or spend their remaining time being fully taken care of. We engage several…

    Animals
    10
    Therapeutic Riding and Off-Track Rehabilitation Trotr

    The rehabilitation of horses and people through interaction with each other.

    Animals
    11
    2nd Chance Ranch and Rescue

    Sanctuary for abused or abandoned animals

    Animals
    12
    New Hope Farm Inc

    Rescue and sanctuary for horses, donkeys, and mules.

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is High Hopes Therapeutic Riding Inc and the most unlike its peers is Collie Rescue of the Carolinas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    2
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    2
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    8/8
    Grantees still filing
    4/8
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    COLLIE RESCUE OF THE CAROLINAS — $125,000 · AnimalsCOLLIE RESCUE OF THE CAROLINASSOUTHERN COMFORT ANIMAL RESCUE — $100,000 · AnimalsSOUTHERN COMFORT ANIMAL RESCUEJENNIS RESCUE RANCH — $75,000 · AnimalsJENNIS RESCUE RANCHHIGH HOPES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC — $45,000 · OtherHIGH HOPES THERAPEUTIC RIDING IN…SYA LONG EARS RESCUE — $43,500 · OtherSYA LONG EARS RESCUEMISFIT ACRES — $38,500 · OtherMISFIT ACRESNSBA — $33,500 · OtherNSBASTONE ACRES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC — $19,000 · OtherSTONE ACRES THERAPEUTIC RIDING I…PARTNERS FOR PROGRESS NFP — $52,750 · Human ServicesPARTNERS FOR PROGRE…LaDawn Quarter Horses Therapeutic RC — $47,000 · Human ServicesLaDawn Quarter Hors…BRIGHT STAR STABLES — $11,500 · Human ServicesBRIGHT STAR STABLESManes and Motions Therapeutic Riding Center Inc — $43,000 · Health
    Animals$300,000Other$179,500Human Services$111,250Health$43,000

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOLLIE RESCUE OF THE CAROLINAS — $125,000 over 4y, 30% of budgetSOUTHERN COMFORT ANIMAL RESCUE — $100,000 over 4y, 39% of budgetJENNIS RESCUE RANCH — $75,000 over 5y, 9.3% of budgetPARTNERS FOR PROGRESS NFP — $52,750 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetLaDawn Quarter Horses Therapeutic RC — $47,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetHIGH HOPES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC — $45,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetManes and Motions Therapeutic Riding Center Inc — $43,000 over 5y, 5.9% of budgetBRIGHT STAR STABLES — $11,500 over 4y, 7.4% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds COLLIE RESCUE OF THE CAROLINAS
    • Who funds SOUTHERN COMFORT ANIMAL RESCUE
    • Who funds JENNIS RESCUE RANCH
    • Who funds PARTNERS FOR PROGRESS NFP
    • Who funds LaDawn Quarter Horses Therapeutic RC
    • Who funds HIGH HOPES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC
    • Who funds Manes and Motions Therapeutic Riding Center Inc
    • Who funds BRIGHT STAR STABLES

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    American Online Giving Foundation IncDE5.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Pine Bar Cornerstone Foundation Tr funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
    • High Hopes Therapeutic Riding Inc0% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Pine Bar Cornerstone Foundation Tr?

    Find your warmest path to Pine Bar Cornerstone Foundation Tr through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph