Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Philly Baer Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$57k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$210kHuman Services$15kEducation$3k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
$7,250
Median grant
1
States reached
$193k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Easter Seals Dupage & The Fox Valley Region$20,000
The Kids Equipment Network NFP$20,000
Larabida Children's Hospital$7,250
Center for Independence Through Conductive Education$5,000
JCFS Chicago$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%The Kids Equipment Network NFP: $20k → 7%The Kids Equipment Network NFP: $20k → 7%The Kids Equipment Network NFP: $15k → 7%The Kids Equipment Network NFP: $10k → 7%The Kids Equipment Network NFP: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$193k · 3 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
4

Total granted

$193k
$23k

Still filing today

67%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ES
    EASTER SEALS DUPAGE & THE FOX VALLEY REGION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $103k · revenue -3%
  • TK
    THE KIDS EQUIPMENT NETWORK NFP
    5× · 2021–2025 · $70k · revenue +61%
  • JC
    JCFS Chicago
    4× · 2022–2025 · $20k

Funded once

  • ES
    Easter Seals of DuPage
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • TK
    The Kids Equipment Network
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
  • P
    Pathways
    one grant, 2017 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
2/4
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EASTER SEALS DUPAGE & THE FOX VALLEY REGION — $102,898 · HealthEASTER SEALS DUPAGE & THE FOX VALLEY REGIONLa Rabida Children's Hospital — $7,250 · HealthLa Rabida Children's HospitalTHE KIDS EQUIPMENT NETWORK NFP — $70,000 · Human ServicesTHE KIDS EQUIPMENT NETWORK NFPJCFS Chicago — $20,000 · OtherJCFS ChicagoEaster Seals of DuPage — $14,500 · OtherEaster Seals of DuPag…The Kids Equipment Network — $4,000 · OtherThe Kids Equipment Ne…Pathways — $3,000 · OtherPathways+1 more — $1,078 · OtherCenter for Independence through Conductive Education Inc — $5,000 · Education
Health$110,148Human Services$70,000Other$42,578Education$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEASTER SEALS DUPAGE & THE FOX VALLEY REGION — $102,898 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE KIDS EQUIPMENT NETWORK NFP — $70,000 over 5y, 13% of budgetLa Rabida Children's Hospital — $7,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EASTER SEALS DUPAGE & THE FOX VALLEY REGION
  • Who funds THE KIDS EQUIPMENT NETWORK NFP
  • Who funds La Rabida Children's Hospital
  • Who funds Center for Independence through Conductive Education Inc

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Philly Baer Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Philly Baer Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Philly Baer Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph