Skip to content

Pennsylvania · Private foundation

Philachange

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$205k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
4
Grants FY2024
6
Organizations funded FY2023
83%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$35,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$130,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 6
FY2020 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
2
Total assets, FY2024
$1.2M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 83% of the organizations Philachange funded were first-time grantees, receiving 64% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23
InternationalCrime & LegalHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving4$205k50%
FY20236$111k83%
FY20222$125k50%
FY20213$90k100%
FY20201$30kn/a
94% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$130kEnvironment$130kPhilanthropy$90kInternational$65kCrime & Legal$65kCommunity Improvement$30kEducation$20kHousing & Shelter$11kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Neighborhood Gardens Trust$130,00017%
Freedom House$65,00020%
The Public Interest Law Center$65,00022%
Philadelphia City Fund Inc$30,00010%
Samaritas$30,00020%
Reading Allowed$20,00011%
Hope & Door$10,50512%
Inscite Illinois$5,00011%

Plus 4 recipients with no EIN on record ($205k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Philachange supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNeighborhood Gardens Trust: $130,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetFreedom House: $65,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Public Interest Law Center: $65,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetPhiladelphia City Fund Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSamaritas: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetReading Allowed: $20,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetHope & Door: $10,505 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetInscite Illinois: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The William Penn FoundationPA13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The William Penn Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Philachange with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Philachange?

Find your warmest path to Philachange through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Philachange

How much does Philachange give?
Philachange reported 4 grants totaling $205,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 6 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2023.
What does Philachange fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2024, its largest causes are Human Services (23%), Environment (23%), Philanthropy (16%).
Who are Philachange's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2024: Neighborhood Gardens Trust ($130k), Freedom House ($65k), The Public Interest Law Center ($65k).
Does Philachange fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 83% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Philachange accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Philachange?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The William Penn Foundation, Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program, American Online Giving Foundation Inc.
Where is Philachange based?
Philachange is based in PA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Philachange’s filings →

More from the funding graph