· Public charity
Phi Gamma Delta Educational Foundation Inc
To provide educational support and services for college students.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 90% of PHI GAMMA DELTA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $1,153,462 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,764,010 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $610,548 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $85k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $415k
- $250k+1 grant · $647k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FRATERNITY OF PHI GAMMA DELTA INC | $647,060 |
| THE ALPHA IOTA ASSOCIATION | $141,455 |
| MU UPSILON ASSOCIATION | $96,225 |
| GAMMA TAU CHAPTER OF PHI GAMMA DELTA | $69,000 |
| SIGMA OMICRON HOUSING | $58,500 |
| FOUNDATION FOR FRATERNAL EXCELLENCE | $50,000 |
| LAMBDA CORPORATION | $31,000 |
| UPSILON ALPHA BUILDING CORP INC | $30,000 |
| HOUSE CORPORATION OF PHI GAMMA DELTA AT RPI | $23,500 |
| FIJI HOUSE CORPORATION OF AKRON | $6,722 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 89% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
20 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $69k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LCLambda Corporation4× · 2018–2021 · $777k · revenue +26% · 33% of their budget
- MUMU UPSILON ASSOCIATION6× · 2018–2025 · $449k · revenue +107% · 51% of their budget
- PGPHI GAMMA DELTA CHAPTER ASSOCIATION4× · 2017–2022 · $332k · revenue +61%
Funded once
- UOUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKYone grant, 2019 · $47k
- TPTHE PHI GAMMA DELTA HOUSE ASSOC GETTYSBURGone grant, 2020 · $35k · revenue -43% · 45% of their budget
- PGPHI GAMMA DELTA FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $34k · revenue +47%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Housing for college fraternity
Chapter housing leased to members to provide an environment for study, sleep, hygiene, meals and fellowship, suitable for the development of men attending the institute for education.
Provide Chapter House for Students
Provide occupancy for live-in members of Phi Sigma Kappa WSU Fraternity.Provide Philanthropy for Community.
Hold real property used by undergraduate chapter of nationally chartered social fraternity.
Provide housing for university students
To provide guidance and shelter to members
College Fraternity
Provide a residential facility for undergraduates to live, study, and participate in social activities and athletic events. the members also participate in volunteer activities to support the community. the organization provides a place…
Fraternity organization providing meeting space chapter activities and lodging
Provide housing for undergraduate chapter of national collegiate fraternity and facilitate between alumni and undergraduate members.
Provide room and board to undergraduate members attending the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Boston area schools
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gamma Tau Inc and the most unlike its peers is Tech Fijis Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 60 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE FRATERNITY OF PHI GAMMA DELTA INC ↗
- Who funds LAMBDA IOTA GRADUATE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Lambda Corporation ↗
- Who funds MU UPSILON ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds F A MORSE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds SIGMA OMICRON HOUSING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds PHI GAMMA DELTA CHAPTER ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds PURPLE OWL HOUSE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds UPSILON ALPHA BUILDING CORPORATION INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TECH FIJIS INC ↗
- Who funds ALPHA KAPPA EPSILON FRATERNITY ↗
- Who funds LAMBDA CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds KAPPA DEUTERON FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR FRATERNAL EXCELLENCE INC ↗
- Who funds PHI GAMMA DELTA FRATERNITY ALPHA IOTA CH ↗
- Who funds HOUSE CORPORATION OF PHI GAMMA DELTA-RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INST ↗
- Who funds OHIO WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds GAMMA TAU INC ↗
- Who funds PHI GAMMA DELTA FRATERNITY ↗
- Who funds PHI GAMMA DELTA FRATERNITY /Fiji House Corp University of Akron ↗
- Who funds THE PHI GAMMA DELTA HOUSE ASSOC GETTYSBURG ↗
- Who funds PHI GAMMA DELTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DELTA IOTA OF PHI GAMMA DELTA ↗
- Who funds Gamma Phi ChapterPhi Gamma Delta Alumni Association ↗
- Who funds Peoria Phi Gamma Delta Housing Corporation ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA PHI GAMMA DELTA ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MANHATTAN FIJI HOUSE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MU DEUTERON CHAPTER HOUSE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds WHITE OWL HOUSING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Upsilon Phi Housing Corporation Inc ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Phi Gamma Delta Educational Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Phi Gamma Delta Educational Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Phi Gamma Delta Educational Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.