Skip to content

· Public charity

Peylim Lev Lachim

Peylim Lev LAchim is the umbrella for an array of Jewish, Torah based programs including worship, lectures and financial support for US and Israeli institutions involved in education and outreach.

$4.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.5MReligion$390kRecreation & Sports$9kInternational$6k
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 21 grants below total $295,402, the rows itemized in this filing. The $4,415,368 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $4,119,966 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $78k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $157k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$8,400
Median grant
2
States reached
$47k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Cong Kahal Chasidy Chernobyl$60,250
MANHATTAN HIGH SCHOOL$30,000
YESHIVA SHAAR HATALMUD$24,000
YESHIVA SHAGAS ARYEH INC$21,000
CONG KEREN HAGEMACH$20,300
BAIS RIVKA ROCHEL$19,200
LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL$18,252
KOL RENA INC$12,300
YESHIVA OHR HATORAH$12,000
BETH MEDRASH GOVOHA$9,000
BAIS YAAKOV HIGH SCHOOL$8,400
YESHIVA OHR YISROEL$7,500
YESHIVA TIFERES SHMUEL$6,000
MESIVTA OHR OLAM$6,000
BAIS REUVEN KAMENETZ$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 92% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Cong Kahal Chasidy Chernobyl: $60k → 6%YESHIVA ZICHRON PALTIEL: $14k → 11%YESHIVA TIFERES YISROEL: $40k → 14%MANHATTAN HIGH SCHOOL: $35k → 17%ZICHRON YOSEF: $30k → 20%KOL RENA INC: $12k → 6%YESHIVA SHAAR HATALMUD: $42k → 11%Cong Kahal Chasidy Chernobyl: $36k → 6%YESHIVA TIFERES YISROEL: $26k → 14%MANHATTAN HIGH SCHOOL: $30k → 17%ZICHRON YOSEF: $28k → 20%YESHIVA SHAAR HATALMUD: $42k → 11%Cong Kahal Chasidy Chernobyl: $18k → 6%YESHIVA TIFERES YISROEL: $24k → 14%CONG TIFERES ZION OF VYELIPOL: $17k → 20%YESHIVA SHAAR HATALMUD: $38k → 11%Cong Kahal Chasidy Chernobyl: $16k → 6%YESHIVA TIFERES YISROEL: $23k → 14%CONG TIFERES ZION OF VYELIPOL: $17k → 20%YESHIVA SHAAR HATALMUD: $36k → 11%Cong Kahal Chasidy Chernobyl: $13k → 6%ZICHRON YOSEF: $15k → 20%YESHIVA SHAAR HATALMUD: $33k → 11%YESHIVA SHAAR HATALMUD: $24k → 11%YESHIVA SHAAR HATALMUD: $24k → 11%YESHIVA SHAAR HATALMUD: $22k → 11%YESHIVA SHAGAS ARYEH INC: $21k → 11%BNOS BROCHA INC: $20k → 11%BAIS RIVKA ROCHEL: $19k → 11%LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL: $18k → 11%LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL: $18k → 11%EIN OD MILVADO: $13k → 11%EDUCATIONAL ENDOWMENT FUND: $13k → 11%PDUYIM LZION: $25k → 20%CONG ZICHRON BINYAMIN: $12k → 11%YESHIVA JESODE HATORAH: $15k → 20%BNOS ZION OF BOBOV INC: $14k → 20%CONG BAIS KOSOV: $14k → 20%CONG KEREN HAGEMACH: $22k → 20%CONG KEREN HAGEMACH: $21k → 20%CONG KEREN HAGEMACH: $20k → 20%Yeshiva Imrei Bina Inc: $13k → 20%CONG CHIZUK HATORAH: $103k → 20%CONG CHIZUK HATORAH: $88k → 20%CONG CHIZUK HATORAH: $77k → 20%CONG CHIZUK HATORAH: $69k → 20%CONG CHIZUK HATORAH: $60k → 20%Revach VHatzala: $28k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $4.1M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Middle East and North Africa$4.1M · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: SUPPORT OF SERVICES

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 28 repeat orgs$266k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
18

Total granted

$1.9M
$202k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+8%

Still filing today

29%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $64k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionRecreation & SportsInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YS
    YESHIVA SHAAR HATALMUD
    9× · 2017–2025 · $273k · revenue +198%
  • YO
    YESHIVAS OHR HATORAH INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $69k · revenue +157%
  • LC
    LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $67k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • RV
    REVACH VIHATZOLOH
    one grant, 2017 · $28k
  • CK
    CONG KEREN HACHESED OF ADATH ARON V ISRAEL
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • BB
    BNOS BRACHA INC
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshivat Or Hachaim of Lakewood Inc

Parochial elementary school with a focus on sephardic tradition.

Education
2
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
3
Yeshiva Chayei Olam

Yeshiva chayei olam inc., was established for the purpose of having an orthodox jewish high school. the school teaches talumdic studies, talmudic jurasprudence, orthodox jewish ethics and the old testament. in addition, the school provides…

Education
4
Yeshivat Yagdil Torah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
5
Yeshiva Ohr Yehuda Inc

Providing religious and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
6
Mesivta Ohr Yisroel Inc

Parochial secondary school.

Education
7
Yeshiva Toras Chaim Inc

The organization operates a religious/parochial high school and college in lakewood, nj.

Unclassified
8
Yeshiva Keren Hatorah of Passaic- Clifton

To operate a high school offering religious instruction and general studies as well as a post high school program of talmudic studies. the school shall be run under the standards of orthodox jewish law and tradition.

Education
9
Yeshiva Nesivos Hatorah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
10
Yeshiva of Los Angeles Girls High School

To provide academic excellence in both limudei kodesh and secular studies.

—
11
Yeshiva Derech Hatorah-Yeshivat Mizrachi Lbanim

A school-section 170(b)(1)(a)(ii), operating from the preschool pre-k level through high school, and chartered ny the new york state education department and board of regents.

Education
12
Yeshiva Bais Mordechai of Teaneck

To provide religious Jewish education.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshiva Shaar Hatalmud; the most unlike its peers is Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHIZUK HATORAH INC: $397,800 · OtherCHIZUK HATORAH INCCONGREGATION KEHAL CHASIDY CHERNOBEL: $143,750 · OtherCONGREGATION KEHAL CHASIDY CHERNOBELBETH MEDRASH GOVOHA OF AMERICA: $80,000 · OtherBETH MEDRASH GOVOHA OF AMERICACONGREGATION TIFERES ZION OF VYELIPOL INC: $76,850 · OtherCONGREGATION TIFERES ZION OF VYELIPOL INCCONGREGATION ZICHRON YOSEF: $72,500 · OtherCONGREGATION ZICHRONE BINYAMIN: $67,000 · OtherMANHATTAN HIGH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS: $65,000 · OtherCONGREGATION KEREN HAGEMACH: $62,400 · Other+28 more: $451,794 · Other+28 moreYESHIVA SHAAR HATALMUD: $272,500 · EducationYESHIVA SHAAR HATALMUDYeshiva Tiferes Yisroel: $149,707 · EducationYeshiva Tiferes YisroelEDUCATIONAL ENDOWMENT FUND INC: $84,000 · EducationEDUCATIONAL ENDOWMENT FUND INCYESHIVAS OHR HATORAH INC: $68,900 · EducationYESHIVAS OHR HATORAH INCLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $67,210 · EducationLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC+7 more: $104,400 · Education+7 moreYESHIVAS NER MOSHE ASSOCIATION INC: $15,000 · ReligionYESHIVA IMREI BINA INC: $13,000 · ReligionOHR NAAVA: $6,100 · ReligionCAMP DORA GOLDING: $8,500 · Recreation & SportsYESHIVA OHR YISROEL: $7,500 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $6,000 · International
Other$1,417,094Education$746,717Religion$34,100Recreation & Sports$8,500Philanthropy$7,500International$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYESHIVA SHAAR HATALMUD: $272,500 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetYeshiva Tiferes Yisroel: $149,707 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetEDUCATIONAL ENDOWMENT FUND INC: $84,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetYESHIVAS OHR HATORAH INC: $68,900 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $67,210 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTALMUDIC RESEARCH CENTER OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBNOS BRACHA INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBais Yaakov High School of Lakewood Inc: $15,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVAS NER MOSHE ASSOCIATION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetYESHIVA IMREI BINA INC: $13,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBAIS REUVEN KAMENETZ OF LAKEWOOD: $12,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA GEDOLAH OF WOODLAKE VILLAGE: $9,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCAMP DORA GOLDING: $8,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONGREGATION BNOS YAAKOV INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOHR NAAVA: $6,100 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YESHIVA SHAAR HATALMUD ↗
  • Who funds Yeshiva Tiferes Yisroel ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATIONAL ENDOWMENT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAS OHR HATORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA SHAGAS ARYEH INC ↗
  • Who funds TALMUDIC RESEARCH CENTER OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY ↗
  • Who funds BNOS BRACHA INC ↗
  • Who funds Bais Yaakov High School of Lakewood Inc ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAS NER MOSHE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA IMREI BINA INC ↗
  • Who funds BAIS REUVEN KAMENETZ OF LAKEWOOD ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA GEDOLAH OF WOODLAKE VILLAGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY54.6× affinity35 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Jewish Communal Fund · Donors Fund Inc · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Regina Goldwasser Foundation · Toras Chesed Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Tifferet Moshe Inc · Lakewood Cheder School Inc · Eisenberg Family Foundation Inc · Maalot

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Peylim Lev Lachim funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Peylim Lev Lachim. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Yeshivas Ohr Hatorah Inc: 28% of income from government
  • Bnos Bracha Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Shaar Hatalmud: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Peylim Lev Lachim?

Find your warmest path to Peylim Lev Lachim through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Peylim Lev Lachim’s filings →

More from the funding graph