Skip to content
Petherick Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Petherick Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$126k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$101k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Philanthropy$102kReligion$30kHealth$30kFood & Nutrition$26kArts & Culture$14kEducation$11kHuman Services$11k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $101k
$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$782k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UPLIFT BONITA$100,583
GEORGIANNA CHURCH$10,000
WONDER GARDENS$5,100
PREBORN$2,500
HELP A DIABETIC CHILD$2,500
BONITA SPRINGS ASSISTANCE OFFICE$2,500
DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PREBORN: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

25%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$55k · 4 repeat orgs$166k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against -7% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
7

Total granted

$55k
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
-7%

Still filing today

100%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 4% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $121k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FT
    FEED THY NEIGHBOR
    3× · 2021–2024 · $26k · revenue -16%
  • HA
    HELP A DIABETIC CHILD INC
    3× · 2020–2025 · $14k · revenue -19%
  • DR
    DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2019–2025 · $12k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • NL
    NEW LIFE CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • MI
    MERRITT ISLAND CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • BS
    BONITA SPRINGS YMCA
    one grant, 2024 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
Venomx Biologics
—
3
Cure Diabetes Inc
Health
4
Access to Advanced Health Institute

Aahi is a nonprofit biotech research institute, bringing together the best experts, technologies, and platforms to create accessible, high-quality products and solutions for harnessing the immune system to alleviate disease.

Health
5
Food Allergy Science Initiative Inc

To accelerate the development of breakthrough discoveries that will transform the lives of people living with food allergies.

—
6
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
7
Biotechnology Innovation Organization

The biotechnology innovation organization (bio) represents approximately 1,000 companies and organizations in washington dc, state capitals, and international fora. bio is founded on the principle that policy must nurture innovation in the…

—
8
XenoTherapeutics Inc
Health
9
Business Executives for National Security

Bens applies industry experience and best business practices to help address our nation's pressing national security challenges.

International
10
Nmdp Foundation

Raises funds to support the national marrow donor program (nmdp) mission: we save lives through cellular therapy.

Philanthropy
11
Guardian Angels of Naples Foundation
—
12
Florida Pointer Rescue Inc

Rescue pointer dogs and treat back to health and f

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Navy Seal Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ambers Antibodies Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UPLIFT BONITA INC: $100,583 · OtherUPLIFT BONITA INCNEW LIFE CHURCH: $20,000 · OtherNEW LIFE CHURCHGEORGIANNA CHURCH: $10,000 · OtherGEORGIANNA CHURCHMERRITT ISLAND CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $10,000 · OtherMERRITT ISLAND CHRISTIAN SCHOOLBONITA SPRINGS YMCA: $5,500 · Other+4 more: $11,000 · Other+4 moreHELP A DIABETIC CHILD INC: $13,500 · HealthHELP A DIABET…DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC: $12,100 · HealthDIABETES RESE…FEED THY NEIGHBOR: $25,500 · Food & NutritionFEED THY NEIG…BONITA WONDER GARDENS INC: $5,100 · Arts & CultureNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureAMBERS ANTIBODIES INC: $4,000 · PhilanthropyMission Pre-Born Inc: $2,500 · Human ServicesNORTH NAPLES EDUCATION CENTER INC: $1,000 · Education
Other$157,083Health$25,600Food & Nutrition$25,500Arts & Culture$6,100Philanthropy$4,000Human Services$2,500Education$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFEED THY NEIGHBOR: $25,500 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetHELP A DIABETIC CHILD INC: $13,500 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetDIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC: $12,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBONITA WONDER GARDENS INC: $5,100 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUDT - SEAL MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMBERS ANTIBODIES INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetNORTH NAPLES EDUCATION CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Collier Community Fou…Southwest Florida Com…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Collier Community Foundation IncFL15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Collier Community Foundation Inc · Southwest Florida Community Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Petherick Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Petherick Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • North Naples Education Center Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Help a Diabetic Child Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Petherick Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Petherick Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Petherick Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home