Skip to content

· Public charity

Peterson Solutions Fund

See schedule oPETERSON SOLUTIONS FUND is a nonpartisan organization that promotes social welfare and advocates for fact-based solutions to improve the policymaking process, stabilize america's fiscal outlook, achieve better healthcare outcomes at lower cost, and strengthen the pillars of our democracy to support a thriving economy for…

$3.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Public Benefit$7.5MHealth$160kCommunity Improvement$150kEmployment$120k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $42k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $580k
  • $250k+4 grants · $3.0M
$160,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$429M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONCORD COALITION ACTION FUND$2,050,000
BIPARTISAN POLICY CENTER ACTION INC$400,000
THE PEOPLE FOUNDATION$305,000
AMERICAN POLICY VENTURES ACTION INC$250,000
EMPLOYERS FORUM OF INDIANA INC$160,000
BIPARTISAN POLICY CENTER ACTION INC$150,000
REPUBLICAN MAIN STREET PARTNERSHIP$150,000
THE ERISA INDUSTRY COMMITTEE$120,000
PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE$25,000
THIRD WAY$17,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE: $25k → 8%REPUBLICAN MAIN STREET PARTNERSHIP: $150k → 14%EMPLOYERS FORUM OF INDIANA INC: $160k → 5%CENTER FORWARD: $100k → 6%CONCORD COALITION ACTION FUND: $2.0M → 7%BIPARTISAN POLICY CENTER ACTION INC: $711k → 14%BIPARTISAN POLICY CENTER ACTION INC: $450k → 14%BIPARTISAN POLICY CENTER ACTION INC: $400k → 14%BIPARTISAN POLICY CENTER ACTION INC: $150k → 14%ISSUE ONE ACTION: $100k → 14%AMERICAN POLICY VENTURES ACTION INC: $250k → 14%THE ERISA INDUSTRY COMMITTEE: $120k → 14%FIX THE DEBT COALITION INC: $1.5M → 14%FIX THE DEBT COALITION INC: $689k → 14%FIX THE DEBT COALITION INC: $460k → 14%THIRD WAY: $17k → 14%THIRD WAY: $17k → 14%UNITED TO PROTECT DEMOCRACY: $185k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.4M · 3 repeat orgs$3.5M to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
4

Total granted

$4.4M
$485k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+39%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Public BenefitCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FT
    FIX THE DEBT COALITION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2.7M · revenue +140% · 57% of their budget
  • BP
    BIPARTISAN POLICY CENTER ACTION INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +4%
  • TW
    THIRD WAY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $34k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • PD
    PROTECT DEMOCRACY UNITEDgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $185k · revenue +39%
  • IO
    ISSUE ONE ACTIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +207% · 40% of their budget
  • CF
    CENTER FORWARD
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Issue One

Issue one is the leading crosspartisan political reform organization that educates the public, engages capitol hill, and advocates for solutions to fix our broken political system.

Public Benefit
2
Bipartisan Policy Center Inc

To drive principled solutions through rigorous analysis, reasoned negotiation, and respectful dialogue. to actively promote bipartisanship and work to address the key challenges facing the nation including energy and infrastructure,…

Public Benefit
3
Employ America

To promote macroeconomic policies that ensure the sustained advancement of labor market outcomes for all american workers, i.e. tight labor markets, higher wages and better quality employment.

Employment
4
People's Independent Commission

Supports Measure to Remove Lawmakers Power to Set Their Own Pay

—
5
Press Watch

To educate journalists and the public, and foster public debate, about improving political journalism to reflect public needs and hold the powerful accountable.

—
6
Commission On Presidential Debates

Organize general election presidential and vice-presidential debates

Civil Rights
7
Public Agenda Inc

Public agenda strengthens american democracy by connecting research to action enabling people and institutions to pursue changes that make a difference. we amplify the voices of americans and help communities discover and build on common…

—
8
Partnership for Public Service Inc

Making our government work better is a daunting task, and we are a small organization seeking to transform a government that employs millions of civilians and manages trillions of dollars in taxpayer revenue needed to protect public…

Employment
9
Center for Popular Democracy Inc

The center for popular democracy (cpd) and its affiliates know that everyday people have the power to change the world. we upend business and politics as usual to forge a representative, multiracial government and society where we all…

Public Benefit
10
Third Way Institute

Third way institute supports charitable and educational activities that advance centrist solutions to major economic, national security, energy and social policy issues.

Civil Rights
11
Defend Democracy Now

Conduct research and expose abuse of authority and power by government authorities and the deleterious effect such actions have on american democracy.

—
12
Institute for Public Accuracy

To teach and disseminate educational materials to the public.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Issue One Action; the most unlike its peers is Third Way. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONCORD COALITION ACTION FUND INC: $2,050,000 · OtherCONCORD COALITION ACTION FUND INCTHE PEOPLE FOUNDATION: $305,000 · OtherTHE PEOPLE FOUNDATIONAMERICAN POLICY VENTURES ACTION INC: $250,000 · OtherAMERICAN POLICY VENTURES ACTION INCPROTECT DEMOCRACY UNITED: $185,000 · OtherPROTECT DEMOCRACY UNITEDTHE ERISA INDUSTRY COMMITTEE: $120,000 · Other+1 more: $100,000 · OtherFIX THE DEBT COALITION INC: $2,654,000 · Civil RightsFIX THE DEBT COALITION INC+1 more: $34,000 · Civil RightsBIPARTISAN POLICY CENTER ACTION INC: $1,711,000 · Community ImprovementBIPARTISAN POLICY CENTER…REPUBLICAN MAIN STREET PARTNERSHIP: $150,000 · Public BenefitCENTER FORWARD: $100,000 · Public BenefitNorth Carolina Information Innovation Fund Inc: $100,000 · Public BenefitEMPLOYERS' FORUM OF INDIANA INC: $160,000 · HealthPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $25,000 · Education
Other$3,010,000Civil Rights$2,688,000Community Improvement$1,711,000Public Benefit$350,000Health$160,000Education$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFIX THE DEBT COALITION INC: $2,654,000 over 2y, 57% of budgetBIPARTISAN POLICY CENTER ACTION INC: $1,711,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetPROTECT DEMOCRACY UNITED: $185,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetISSUE ONE ACTION: $100,000 over 1y, 40% of budgetCENTER FORWARD: $100,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetNorth Carolina Information Innovation Fund Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetTHIRD WAY: $34,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

The Business Roundtable IncDC13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Business Roundtable Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Peterson Solutions Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Peterson Solutions Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Peterson Solutions Fund?

Find your warmest path to Peterson Solutions Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Peterson Solutions’ filings →

More from the funding graph