Skip to content

· Private foundation

Peterson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$23kHuman Services$9kHealth$8kAnimals$4kHousing & Shelter$2kEducation$2kArts & Culture$1kInternational$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$8,863
Median grant
2
States reached
$134k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Temple Christian Outreach$8,863
Individual grant recipient$944
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Temple Christian Outreach: $9k → 14%Happy Hill Farm: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
OR
PA
NJ
AZ
TN
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$23k · 5 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +125% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
15

Total granted

$23k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+125%
+19%

Still filing today

20%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
Human ServicesAnimalsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SE
    ST EDWARDS CATHOLIC CHURCH
    5× · 2017–2021 · $13k
  • SH
    St Helen's Catholic Church
    2× · 2021–2022 · $5k
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    3× · 2018–2022 · $4k · revenue +125%

Funded once

  • SJ
    ST JUDES CHILDRENS HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • FP
    FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER WASHINGTON COUNTYgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +488%
  • UG
    UNION GOSPEL MISSION
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greyhound Pets of America

Finding adoptive homes for retired racing greyhound adoptions

Animals
2
Austin Greyhound Adoption

The primary objectives and purposes of this organization shall be to find responsible loving homes for purebred greyhounds which fail to qualify for the racetrack or no longer qualify for the racetrack, to acquaint the public with the…

Animals
3
Pippys Pals Rescue

Pippys Pals Rescue is dedicated to saving the lives of dogs facing euthanasia in Houston. Our mission is to provide a second chance to these beloved companions by rescuing them from shelters, providing them with necessary medical care, and…

Animals
4
Tulsa Spca

The Tulsa SPCA's mission is to improve the lives of dogs and cats, and their human companions.

Animals
5
Rogue Valley Humane Society

The Rogue Valley Humane Society provides compassionate care for stray unwanted displaced and abandoned animals and works toward ending pet overpopulation so that there will be no more homeless pets. We are committed to placing every…

Animals
6
Greyhound Pets Inc

Recovering and placing greyhound dogs in adoptive homes.

Animals
7
Paws of Grays Harbor

PAWS cares for lost, abandoned and abused animals and finds them new homes with responsible owners. PAWS also provides low cost spay and neuter services, a pet food pantry, and community education. During 2024 PAWS adopted out 577 pets.…

Animals
8
Greyhound Pet Adoption Fl Se Inc

Place retired racing greyhounds in homes

—
9
Herding Dog Rescue of Central Oregon

Our mission is to help herding dogs who are abandoned, neglected and abused or simply in the wrong home into a loving appropriate home.

Animals
10
Humane Heroes Inc

The Organizations mission is to save the lives of adoptable dogs and cats from shelters throughout Texas, to decrease overpopulation of animals through low-cost veterinary services, and to enhance the lives of pets through educational…

Animals
11
Heavens Home Rescue Inc

Heavens Home Rescue saves dogs and cats from high kill shelters. We focus our efforts on abuse cases feral dogs hospice cases and pregnant and nursing dogs and cats and the prevention of cruelty to animals.

Animals
12
Celestial Zoo Pet Rescue

To help homeless pets find their forever home. it includes fostering, medicdal and microchipping them.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise of Greater Washington County; the most unlike its peers is Greyhound Pets of Arizona. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST EDWARDS CATHOLIC CHURCH: $13,000 · OtherST EDWARDS CATHOLIC CHURCHSt Helen's Catholic Church: $4,500 · OtherSt Helen's Catholic ChurchST JUDES CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $3,000 · OtherST JUDES CHILDRENS HOSPITALUNION GOSPEL MISSION: $2,000 · OtherUNION GOSPEL MISSIONST FRANCIS OF ASSISI CATHOLIC CHURC: $1,500 · OtherHAPPY HILL FARM ACADEMY: $1,250 · Other+9 more: $7,244 · Other+9 moreTEMPLE CHRISTIAN OUTREACH INC: $8,863 · Human ServicesTEMPLE CHRISTIAN OUTREACH…FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER WASHINGTON COUNTY: $2,100 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER…HAPPY HILL FARM CHILDRENS HOME INC: $500 · Human ServicesST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $3,635 · HealthTHE OREGON ZOO FOUNDATION: $1,700 · AnimalsGREYHOUND PETS OF ARIZONA: $1,000 · AnimalsGREYHOUND RESCUE SOCIETY OF TEXAS INCORPORATED: $500 · Animals
Other$32,494Human Services$11,463Health$3,635Animals$3,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTEMPLE CHRISTIAN OUTREACH INC: $8,863 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $3,635 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER WASHINGTON COUNTY: $2,100 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE OREGON ZOO FOUNDATION: $1,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT VERITAS: $1,075 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHAPPY HILL FARM CHILDRENS HOME INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TEMPLE CHRISTIAN OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER WASHINGTON COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds THE OREGON ZOO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT VERITAS ↗
  • Who funds GREYHOUND PETS OF ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds GREYHOUND RESCUE SOCIETY OF TEXAS INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds HAPPY HILL FARM CHILDRENS HOME INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Peterson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Peterson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Peterson Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Peterson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Peterson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph