Skip to content

· Private foundation

Peters Pharis Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$580k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0171% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$770kCommunity Improvement$40kYouth Development$20kHuman Services$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $145k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $435k
$40,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RON BROWN SCHOLAR FUND$150,000
THRIVE SCHOLARS$150,000
Individual grant recipient$75,000
COUNCIL FOR GREAT CITY SCHOOLS$60,000
COLLEGE BOUND$40,000
QUESTBRIDGE$30,000
NEW VILLAGE ACADEMY$25,000
ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF LA$20,000
FULFILLMENT FUND$15,000
HIGH JUMP$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FULFILLMENT FUND: $20k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $20k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $15k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $15k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $10k → 14%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF LA: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$995k · 10 repeat orgs$295k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +0% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
3

Total granted

$995k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+0%

Still filing today

50%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $255k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THRIVE SCHOLARS
    5× · 2020–2025 · $280k · revenue +152%
  • CP
    COMMUNITY PARTNERS
    2× · 2022–2023 · $40k · revenue +78%
  • NV
    NEW VILLAGE CHARTER SCHOOL INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $30k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • OJ
    OPERATION JUMP START
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +0%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • JN
    JUAN NEVAREZ MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
College Match

College match partners with high schools in los angeles county to identify high-achieving, low-income high school students and provide them with the necessary tools and guidance to get into top-ranked colleges with significant financial…

Education
2
Schuler Education Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Stem Advantage

Talent is equally distributed, but opportunity is not. STEM Advantage mentors, prepares, and inspires first-generation, low-income, and underserved college students for careers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). We level…

Youth Development
4
10000 Degrees

10,000 degrees is a leading college success nonprofit in the san francisco bay area. we help students from low-income backgrounds gain access to and complete higher education to positively impact their communities and the world.…

Education
5
College Possible Inc

College possible is a 501(c)(3) non-profit tax-exempt organization making college admission and success possible for students from low-income backgrounds through an intensive curriculum of coaching and support.

Education
6
Foundation for a College Education

Fce's mission is to increase the number of first-generation, low-income students of color from east palo alto, ca and surrounding communities who graduate with a degree from a four-year college or university. fce was founded out of a…

Education
7
Be College Ready
—
8
The Peer Power Foundation Inc

Peer power foundation hires, trains, and deploys college students to be success coaches in economically disadvantaged high schools. (expanded mission on schedule o)these success coaches work primarily inside of english, math, and science…

Education
9
Heights Philadelphia

Heights is a new kind of organization, an economic mobility catalyst. we believe that creating pathways to educational and workforce success for low-income, black and brown, and first-generation-to-college students is the keystone of a…

Education
10
College Horizons Inc

The mission of college horizons (ch) is to encourage and facilitate the education of native american young people. the goals of ch are to increase the higher education rate of native students by provide pre-college (college horizons),…

Education
11
Harlem Children's Zone Inc

We enhance the life for children and families in some of nyc's most devastated neighborhoods.

Human Services
12
Leadership Enterprise for a Diverse America

Leadership enterprise for a diverse america (leda) empowers a community of exceptional young leaders from under-resourced backgrounds by supporting their higher education and professional success in order to create a more inclusive and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Thrive Scholars; the most unlike its peers is College Bound. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $270,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $130,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOUNCIL FOR GREAT CITY SCHOOLS: $80,000 · OtherCOUNCIL FOR GREAT CITY SCHOOLSNEW VILLAGE ACADEMY: $35,000 · OtherNEW VILLAGE ACADEMYQUESTBRIDGE: $30,000 · OtherMOUNT ST MARY'S UNIVERSITY - BRIGHT FUTURES FUND: $20,000 · Other+2 more: $20,000 · OtherTHRIVE SCHOLARS: $280,000 · EducationTHRIVE SCHOLARSRon Brown Scholar Fund: $150,000 · EducationRon Brown Scholar FundCollege Bound: $40,000 · EducationCollege BoundNEW VILLAGE CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $30,000 · EducationNEW VILLAGE CHARTER SCHOOL INCHORATIO ALGER ASSN OF DISTINGUISHED AMERICANS INC: $30,000 · EducationHORATIO ALGER ASSN OF DISTINGUISHED AMERICANS I…+1 more: $15,000 · EducationFULFILLMENT FUND: $80,000 · Human ServicesASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF LOS ANGELES: $20,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $40,000 · Community ImprovementOPERATION JUMP START: $20,000 · Youth Development
Other$585,000Education$545,000Human Services$100,000Community Improvement$40,000Youth Development$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHRIVE SCHOLARS: $280,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetFULFILLMENT FUND: $80,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCollege Bound: $40,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetNEW VILLAGE CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHORATIO ALGER ASSN OF DISTINGUISHED AMERICANS INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF LOS ANGELES: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOPERATION JUMP START: $20,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetHIGH JUMP: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THRIVE SCHOLARS ↗
  • Who funds Ron Brown Scholar Fund ↗
  • Who funds FULFILLMENT FUND ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds College Bound ↗
  • Who funds NEW VILLAGE CHARTER SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds HORATIO ALGER ASSN OF DISTINGUISHED AMERICANS INC ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION JUMP START ↗
  • Who funds HIGH JUMP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Peters Pharis Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Peters Pharis Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Peters Pharis’ filings →

    More from the funding graph