Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Peters Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$49k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Animals$86kHuman Services$56kReligion$15kHealth$14kArts & Culture$13kEducation$11kFood & Nutrition$6k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $37k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$160k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WARRIOR FOUNDATION FREEDOM STATION$20,000
YGGDRASIL URBAN WILDLIFE RESCUE$17,000
THE HOUSE RABBIT SOCIETY$5,000
LINCOLN ELEMENTARY PTA$4,000
HELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%WARRIOR FOUNDATION FREEDOM STATION: $20k → 11%WARRIOR FOUNDATION FREEDOM STATION: $15k → 11%WARRIOR FOUNDATION FREEDOM STATION: $15k → 11%WARRIOR FOUNDATION FREEDOM STATION: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$145k · 4 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +3% since the first grant, against -24% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
4

Total granted

$145k
$48k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
-24%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesArts & CultureEnvironmentHealthFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LW
    LINDSAY WILDLIFE MUSEUM
    4× · 2021–2024 · $49k · revenue +11%
  • YU
    YGGDRASIL URBAN WILDLIFE RESCUE
    3× · 2022–2025 · $29k · revenue +1%
  • LE
    Lincoln Elementary PTA
    2× · 2024–2025 · $11k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • PL
    PURPLE LOTUS TEMPLE AND SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    one grant, 2020 · $14k · revenue -28%
  • TP
    THE PARK THEATER
    one grant, 2024 · $13k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wild Souls Wildlife Rescue and Rehabilitation
Animals
2
Forever Wild Wildlife Rescue
Animals
3
Wolfe Ranch Rescue
Animals
4
Critter Crusaders Wildlife Rehabili

Wildlife rehabilitation

Animals
5
Hearthfire Animal Rescue Team
Animals
6
Help Animals India

Help Animals India is a 501c3 organization dedicated to improving the lives and welfare of animals by providing financial and consultation to support and build capacity of animal rescue groups in India and Nepal while connecting donors…

Animals
7
Wildlife in Need Center Ltd

To provide wildlife rehabilitation to wisconsin wildlife with intent to release back to the native habitat, conduct research designed to further the positive impact of rehabilitation, and provide quality community education programs and…

Animals
8
The Wings of the Dawn Bird Sanctuary Inc

Wildlife rehabilitation

9
Wildlife Rescue and Rehabilitation Inc

Dedicated to the rescue, rehabilitation, and release of orphaned, injured and displaced wildlife. wildlife rescue rescues and cares for all wildlife, including native and nonnative species believing all animals are deserving of care,…

Animals
10
Happy Tails Animal Rescue of Washin County Virginia
Animals
11
Lawrence Humane Society

The lawrence humane society nurtures the human-animal bond by providing shelter, care and advocacy for homeless and abused animals, as well as resource for the pets and people in our community

Animals
12
Baby Gunns Animal Rescue
Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Helen Woodward Animal Center and the most unlike its peers is Lincoln Elementary Pta. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WARRIOR FOUNDATION FREEDOM STATION — $56,000 · Human ServicesWARRIOR FOUNDATION FREEDOM STAT…LINDSAY WILDLIFE MUSEUM — $49,000 · Arts & CultureLINDSAY WILDLIFE MUSEUMPURPLE LOTUS TEMPLE AND SCHOOL — $15,000 · OtherPURPLE LOTUS TEMPLE A…THE PARK THEATER — $12,500 · OtherTHE PARK THEATERLincoln Elementary PTA — $11,000 · OtherLincoln Elementary PT…YGGDRASIL URBAN WILDLIFE RESCUE — $29,000 · EnvironmentYGGDRASIL URBAN …BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $14,000 · HealthHOUSE RABBIT SOCIETY — $5,000 · AnimalsHELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER — $3,000 · AnimalsHOPE FOR THE HURTING — $6,000 · Food & Nutrition
Human Services$56,000Arts & Culture$49,000Other$38,500Environment$29,000Health$14,000Animals$8,000Food & Nutrition$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWARRIOR FOUNDATION FREEDOM STATION — $56,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetLINDSAY WILDLIFE MUSEUM — $49,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetYGGDRASIL URBAN WILDLIFE RESCUE — $29,000 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $14,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLincoln Elementary PTA — $11,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetHOPE FOR THE HURTING — $6,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHOUSE RABBIT SOCIETY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Peters Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Peters Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Peters Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph