Skip to content

· Private foundation

Peter N and Joan Rossin Stephans Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$262k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$702kPhilanthropy$511kEducation$281kHealth$160kArts & Culture$81kRecreation & Sports$45kHuman Services$29kInternational$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $256k
$25,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$6.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION$40,000
SOUTH DAKOTA SCHOOL OF MINES AND TECHNOLOGY$40,000
WESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$40,000
CARNEGIE MUSEUMS OF PITTSBURGH$37,000
HUNGARIAN CATHOLIC MISSION$30,000
UPMC CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$29,530
FRANKLIN ROAD ACADEMY$25,000
ARNOLD & WINNIE PALMER FOUNDATION$14,299
THE NOAH ANGELICI HOPE FOUNDATION$3,000
ALPHA CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION INC$1,000
MORTON PLANT MEASE HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION$1,000
VETERINARY CARE FOUNDATION$500
UPPER ST CLAIR VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$500
WREATHS ACROSS AMERICA$85
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 52% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%THE SHALOM FOUNDATION: $10k → 4%PEOPLE LOVING NASHVILLE: $5k → 14%THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF PITTSBURGH INC: $5k → 11%FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF PITTSBURGH: $500 → 11%LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION: $250 → 11%FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF PITTSBURGH: $150 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
MI
NY
SD
IN
PA
CA
CO
KY
AZ
TN
NC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 19 repeat orgs$159k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
26

Total granted

$1.2M
$116k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+9%

Still filing today

63%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CARNEGIE INSTITUTE
    5× · 2018–2025 · $69k · revenue +28%
  • EM
    EXTRA MILE EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $39k · revenue +8%
  • LU
    LEHIGH UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2018–2020 · $30k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • WP
    WESTMINISTER PRESBTERIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · $13k · revenue +7%
  • TS
    THE SHALOM FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -43%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
2
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
3
Upmc Carlisle

Upmc carlisle's mission is to serve the community by providing access to outstanding patient care and to shape tomorrow's health care system through clinical and technological innovation, research and education.

Health
4
Upmc Pinnacle Hospitals

Upmc pinnacle hospitals mission as a charitable organization is dedicatied to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.

Health
5
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
6
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
7
Methodist Healthcare-Memphis Hospitals

Methodist le bonheur healthcare, in partnership with its medical staffs, will collaborate with patients and their families to be the leader in providing high quality, cost-effective patient-and family-centered care. services will be…

Health
8
The Carle Foundation Hospital

To be the trusted partner in all healthcare decisions and to improve health by providing highly accessible, world-class care and services.

Health
9
Lehigh Valley Hospital

Our mission is to heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and research.

Health
10
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
11
Upmc Group

Healthcare, education, and research

—
12
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Pittsburgh Foundation; the most unlike its peers is South Sixth Street Playground Assoc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
19/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HUNGARIAN CATHOLIC MISSION: $337,000 · OtherHUNGARIAN CATHOLIC MISSIONWESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $310,022 · OtherWESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHSOUTH DAKOTA SCHOOL OF MINES AND TECHNOLOGY: $165,000 · OtherSOUTH DAKOTA SCHOOL OF MINES AND TECHNOLOGYCHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF PGH FDT: $81,000 · OtherCHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF PGH FDTWESTMINISTER PRESBTERIAN CHURCH: $50,000 · OtherCOMMONWEALTH FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Other+20 more: $60,324 · Other+20 moreTHE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $445,300 · PhilanthropyTHE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION+3 more: $15,299 · PhilanthropyEXTRA MILE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $38,500 · EducationLEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $30,000 · EducationFRANKLIN ROAD ACADEMY INC: $25,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $7,700 · EducationCAMP CATANESE FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Education+2 more: $2,250 · EducationCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $81,658 · HealthAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago Foundation: $12,500 · Health+5 more: $6,500 · HealthCARNEGIE INSTITUTE: $68,875 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SHALOM FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF PITTSBURGH INC: $5,650 · Human ServicesPEOPLE LOVING NASHVILLE: $5,000 · Human Services+1 more: $250 · Human ServicesROUNDUP RIVER RANCH: $15,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,053,346Philanthropy$460,599Education$110,950Health$100,658Arts & Culture$69,875Human Services$20,900Recreation & Sports$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $445,300 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $81,658 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCARNEGIE INSTITUTE: $68,875 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEXTRA MILE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $38,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetLEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRANKLIN ROAD ACADEMY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROUNDUP RIVER RANCH: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetARNOLD & WINNIE PALMER FOUNDATION INC: $14,299 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago Foundation: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHALOM FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $7,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP CATANESE FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF PITTSBURGH INC: $5,650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH SIXTH STREET PLAYGROUND ASSOC: $5,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetPEOPLE LOVING NASHVILLE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMORTON PLANT MEASE HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMERAKEY FOUNDATION: $1,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetREADING IS FUNDAMENTAL PITTSBURGH: $1,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALPHA CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUPPER ST CLAIR VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT: $1,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDUQUESNE CLUB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF KENTUCKY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARIO LEMIEUX FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVETERINARY CARE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWreaths Across America: $289 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOYALHANNA WATERSHED ASSOCIATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CARNEGIE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds EXTRA MILE EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LEHIGH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FRANKLIN ROAD ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds ROUNDUP RIVER RANCH ↗
  • Who funds ARNOLD & WINNIE PALMER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE SHALOM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CAMP CATANESE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF PITTSBURGH INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH SIXTH STREET PLAYGROUND ASSOC ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE LOVING NASHVILLE ↗
  • Who funds Noah Angelici Hope Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MORTON PLANT MEASE HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MERAKEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds READING IS FUNDAMENTAL PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds ALPHA CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UPPER ST CLAIR VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT ↗
  • Who funds DUQUESNE CLUB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF KENTUCKY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh FoundationPA16.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · Rossin Foundation · Upmc Group · The Bessemer Giving Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Baird Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Peter N and Joan Rossin Stephans Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Peter N and Joan Rossin Stephans Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Peter N and Joan Rossin Stephans Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Peter N and Joan Rossin Stephans Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Peter N and Joan Rossin Stephans’ filings →

    More from the funding graph