Loading…
· Public charity
PERMIAN BASIN YOUTH CHAVARIM
To help youth in their personal development.
$81k
Granted FY2024
3
Grants
1
Communities
$35k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 66% of PERMIAN BASIN YOUTH CHAVARIM’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
healtheducation
2019
—
2020
—
2021
—
2022
—
2023
—
2024
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 3 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$15,250
Median grant
1
States reached
$234k
Total assets
Largest grants
- GEMELLES CHESED$35,000
- TEMPLE BETH EL$15,250
- CASSATT IN THE BASIN$15,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 12%. 75% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$705k · 18 repeat orgs$93k to everyone else
18 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
18
14
Total granted
$705k
$93k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+53%
+61%
Still filing today
33%
14%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
EducationPublic BenefitYouth DevelopmentInternationalHealthOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SOSPECTRUM OF SOLUTIONS4× · 2017–2022 · $39k · revenue +19%
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAELI DEFENSE FORCES2× · 2017–2018 · $30k · revenue +53%- WTWEST TEXAS FOOD BANK3× · 2017–2020 · $20k · revenue +110%
Funded once
- ECECTOR COUNTY CHILDREN'S SVCS BOARDone grant, 2017 · $10k
- GMGOLDBERG MONTESSORI SCHOOLone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -2%
- F2FOOD 2 KIDSone grant, 2018 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Boys and Girls Clubs of the Permian Basin Inc
The following program activities are available education career development, sports, fitness recreation, arts, character leadership development and health life skills.
Youth Development
2
Boys and Girls Club of Midland Inc
The following program activities are available education career development, sports, fitness recreation, arts, character leadership development and health life skills.
Youth Development
3
Bosque School
Bosque School is a coeducational college preparatory school creating transformative learning experiences that empower a diverse community of students to lead lives of intellectual curiosity, personal integrity, and compassionate…
Education
4
Waco Montessori School
To educate children in a nurturing, stimulating montessori environment that appreciates and celebrates each child, encourages respect for oneself and others, and develops life-long learning and problem-solving skills.
Education
5
The Fay School
The Fay School offers high- quality education for students in preschool through fifth grade.
—
6
The McCombs School of Business
To provide support to The University of Texas McCombs School of Business.
Education
7
The Post Oak School
The Post Oak School was founded to provide a superior Montessori environment and dynamic learning experiences which are designed according to the developmental characteristics and needs of children to guide and nurture each child…
Education
8
Suzuki Institute of Dallas
Providing music education primarily to children, but also to some adults and participating in outreach in the North Texas community.
Arts & Culture
9
Meals On Wheels of Odessa Inc
Meals on Wheels of Odessa enables people to live with dignity by offering community support and sustenance through coordinated services.
—
10
British American Foundation of Texas
BAFTX provides financial support to enable Texas students to fulfil their potential.
Philanthropy
11
Permian Basin Rehabilitation Center
Making life better for our patients, their families, and our community by providing high quality and compassionate therapy services to the Permian Basin.
Health
12
Dallas Christian School
Private christian school education - preschool through high school.
Education
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Club of Odessa and the most unlike its peers is Cassatt in the Basin. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$530,384Public Benefit$128,000Youth Development$80,000International$30,000Education$25,005Health$5,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CASSATT IN THE BASIN ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF ODESSA & MIDLAND ↗
- Who funds SPECTRUM OF SOLUTIONS ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAELI DEFENSE FORCES (FIDF) ↗
- Who funds WEST TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds BYNUM SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds GOLDBERG MONTESSORI SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds JORDAN ELIZABETH HARRIS FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Helen Greathouse Charitable TrustNV13.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Helen Greathouse Charitable Trust · Permian Basin Area Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation PERMIAN BASIN YOUTH CHAVARIM funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CASSATT IN THE BASIN.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 813039670 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on CASSATT IN THE BASIN, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 55% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Permian Basin Youth Chavarim?
Find your warmest path to Permian Basin Youth Chavarim through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines