Skip to content

· Private foundation

Percy Hammond Walsh Fund Xxx-Xx-Xxxx

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$105k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$351kRecreation & Sports$180kHuman Services$75kReligion$60kPublic Safety & Disaster$37kEmployment$36k
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $55k
$5,704
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY$21,256
RIVERBEND CANCER SERVICES$11,409
Beacon Health Foundation Inc$11,409
American Heart Association$11,409
AMERICAN RED CROSS$5,704
League for The Blind & Disabled Inc$5,704
United Health Services$5,704
ST JOSEPH VNA HOME CARE$5,704
American Lung Association$5,704
First Presbyterian Church$5,704
Goodwill Ind of Michiana Inc$4,251
THE PEOPLE'S CHURCH$3,423
Catholic Charities$2,852
Family & Children's Center$2,852
South Bend Medical Foundation$2,282
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$735k · 16 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
1

Total granted

$735k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+39%

Still filing today

50%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Northwestern University
    7× · 2019–2025 · $180k · revenue +34%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    7× · 2019–2025 · $75k · revenue +43%
  • BH
    Beacon Health Foundation Inc
    7× · 2019–2025 · $75k · revenue +441%

Funded once

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $4k · revenue +39%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
2
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
3
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
4
Banner Medical Group

To assist banner health complete its mission, banner medical group (bmg) was created to make health care easier, so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
5
Lehigh Valley Hospital

Our mission is to heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and research.

Health
6
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
7
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
8
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
9
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
10
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
11
Banner Medical Group Colorado

Assist banner health to complete its mission to make health care easier, so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
12
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is South Bend Medical Foundation; the most unlike its peers is American Lung Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CANCER SOCIETY OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY RIVERBEND CANCER SERVICES: $74,776 · OtherCANCER SOCIETY OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY RIVERBEND C…ST JOSEPH VNA HOME CARE: $37,389 · OtherST JOSEPH VNA HOME CAREUNITED HEALTH SERVICES: $37,389 · OtherUNITED HEALTH SERVICESFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $37,388 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHGOODWILL IND OF MICHIANA INC: $35,876 · OtherGOODWILL IND OF MICHIANA INCAMERICAN RED CROSS: $33,140 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSTHE PEOPLE'S CHURCH: $22,433 · OtherTHE PEOPLE'S CHURCHCATHOLIC CHARITIES: $18,693 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES+1 more: $4,857 · OtherAmerican Heart Association Inc: $74,776 · HealthAmerican Heart Association IncBeacon Health Foundation Inc: $74,776 · HealthBeacon Health Foundation IncLEAGUE FOR THE BLIND AND DISABLED INC: $37,389 · HealthLEAGUE FOR THE BLIND AND DISABLED INCAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $37,389 · HealthAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATIONSOUTH BEND MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $14,954 · HealthSOUTH BEND MEDICAL FOUNDATIONFAMILY AND CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $13,836 · HealthFAMILY AND CHILDREN'S CENTER INCNorthwestern University: $179,678 · Recreation & SportsNorthwestern UniversityAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $4,249 · Human Services
Other$301,941Health$253,120Recreation & Sports$179,678Human Services$4,249

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNorthwestern University: $179,678 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $74,776 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBeacon Health Foundation Inc: $74,776 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetCANCER SOCIETY OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY RIVERBEND CANCER SERVICES: $74,776 over 7y, 4.8% of budgetLEAGUE FOR THE BLIND AND DISABLED INC: $37,389 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $37,389 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH BEND MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $14,954 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY AND CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $13,836 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $4,249 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds Beacon Health Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CANCER SOCIETY OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY RIVERBEND CANCER SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds LEAGUE FOR THE BLIND AND DISABLED INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH BEND MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Percy Hammond Walsh Fund Xxx-Xx-Xxxx funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Percy Hammond Walsh Fund Xxx-Xx-Xxxx. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Percy Hammond Walsh Fund Xxx-Xx-Xxxx’s filings →

    More from the funding graph