Skip to content

· Public charity

People Care International Inc

To assist in providing resources to vetted organizations - focusing on educational development, emergency food, medical assistance, leadership development, childcare projects, etc.

$1.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$326k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

International$1.5MReligion$45kRecreation & Sports$25kHuman Services$11kEducation$10kFood & Nutrition$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $446,800, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,742,935 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,296,135 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $56k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
  • $250k+1 grant · $326k
$11,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$878k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WORLDSERVE INTERNATIONAL$326,300
REACHING A GENERATION USA INC$51,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
SHIP OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY CENTER INC$11,000
FRANKLINTON BAPTIST CHURCH$10,000
SIM$10,000
RICH IN GRACE$7,500
AG NATIONAL OFFICE$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SHIP OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $11k → 8%NORTH HAVEN MINISTRIES: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $1.2M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions, $1.2M to organizations and $3k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

South Asia$927k · 75% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: FINANCIAL SUPPORT

Sub-Saharan Africa$317k · 25% · 4 grants · 9 people

Stated purpose: FINANCIAL SUPPORT · SCHOOL FEES · FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 4 repeat orgs$64k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +172% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
2

Total granted

$1.5M
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+172%
0%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $52k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WI
    WORLDSERVE INTERNATIONAL
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +172%
  • RA
    REACHING A GENERATION USA INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $270k · revenue -3%
  • FB
    FRANKLINTON BAPTIST CHURCH
    2× · 2023–2024 · $18k

Funded once

  • UB
    UNITY BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • NH
    NORTH HAVEN MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
4/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WORLDSERVE INTERNATIONAL: $1,211,300 · InternationalWORLDSERVE INTERNATIONAL+1 more: $10,000 · InternationalREACHING A GENERATION USA INC: $270,000 · Youth DevelopmentREACHING A GENERATI…Individual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherFRANKLINTON BAPTIST CHURCH: $17,500 · OtherRICH IN GRACE MINISTRIES: $15,500 · OtherUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH: $10,000 · OtherSIM USA INCORPORATED: $10,000 · OtherTHE GENERAL COUNCIL OF THE ASSEMBLIES OF GOD: $6,000 · OtherTHE SHIP OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $11,000 · Human ServicesNORTH HAVEN MINISTRIES: $2,000 · Human ServicesYale University: $10,000 · Education
International$1,221,300Youth Development$270,000Other$84,000Human Services$13,000Education$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWORLDSERVE INTERNATIONAL: $1,211,300 over 5y, 6.7% of budgetREACHING A GENERATION USA INC: $270,000 over 5y, 5.7% of budgetTHE SHIP OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $11,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYale University: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WORLDSERVE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds REACHING A GENERATION USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SHIP OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MYRIAD USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Yale University ↗
  • Who funds NORTH HAVEN MINISTRIES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization People Care International Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from People Care International Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to People Care International Inc?

Find your warmest path to People Care International Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on People Care International’s filings →

More from the funding graph