Skip to content
Pendleton Community Memorial Health Corp at a glance

· Private foundation

Pendleton Community Memorial Health Corp

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$178kHealth$62kPublic Safety & Disaster$27kHuman Services$14k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$589k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Blue Mountain Community College$8,600
Idaho College of Osteopathic Medici$5,000
Rocky Mountain University of Health$5,000
Pacific NW University$5,000
Oregon Health Sciences University$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,500
Chemeketa Community College$700
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%PIONEER RELIEF NURSERY: $5k → 12%PIONEER RELIEF NURSERY: $5k → 12%PIONEER RELIEF NURSERY: $5k → 12%CLEARVIEW DISABILITY RESOURCE CENTER: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$235k · 15 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
10

Total granted

$235k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+78%

Still filing today

20%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PN
    PACIFIC NORTHWEST UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES
    4× · 2019–2022 · $21k · revenue +51%
  • PR
    PIONEER RELIEF NURSERY PIONEER RELIEF NURSERY
    3× · 2017–2020 · $14k · revenue +244%
  • CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $8k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $13k
  • BM
    Blue Mountain Community College Dis
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • ND
    NEW DIRECTIONS EDUCATION PROJECTgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue +895%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BLUE MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT: $53,052 · OtherBLUE MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICTPacific NW University: $27,200 · OtherPacific NW UniversityBlue Mountain Community College: $19,998 · OtherBlue Mountain Community CollegeST MATHEW'S UNIVERSITY: $15,500 · OtherST MATHEW'S UNIVERSITYIdaho College of Osteopathic Medici: $15,100 · OtherIdaho College of Osteopathic MediciOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY: $14,100 · OtherOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient: $13,333 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $11,000 · OtherBlue Mountain Community College Dis: $10,000 · OtherEAST UMATILLA FIRE AND RESCUE: $9,200 · OtherRocky Mountain University of Health: $9,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF THE SCIENCES IN PHILA: $8,000 · Other+10 more: $27,000 · Other+10 morePACIFIC NORTHWEST UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES: $20,500 · EducationPACIFIC NORTH…CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $8,300 · EducationCORPORATION O…NEW DIRECTIONS EDUCATION PROJECT: $3,600 · EducationNEW DIRECTION…PIONEER RELIEF NURSERY PIONEER RELIEF NURSERY: $13,500 · Human ServicesCLEARVIEW DISABILITY RESOURCE CENTER: $2,500 · Human Services
Other$232,483Education$32,400Human Services$16,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPACIFIC NORTHWEST UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES: $20,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPIONEER RELIEF NURSERY PIONEER RELIEF NURSERY: $13,500 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $8,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE SCIENCES IN PHILADELPHIA: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLEARVIEW DISABILITY RESOURCE CENTER: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PACIFIC NORTHWEST UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds PIONEER RELIEF NURSERY PIONEER RELIEF NURSERY ↗
  • Who funds CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NEW DIRECTIONS EDUCATION PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE SCIENCES IN PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds CLEARVIEW DISABILITY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pendleton Community Memorial Health Corp funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pendleton Community Memorial Health Corp. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 58%
  • Pioneer Relief Nursery Pioneer Relief Nursery: 58% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Pendleton Community Memorial Health Corp?

Find your warmest path to Pendleton Community Memorial Health Corp through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Pendleton Community Memorial Health’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home