Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Peller Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$21kReligion$20kFood & Nutrition$2kInternational$1kEnvironment$1kHealth$1kCivil Rights$658Human Services$618Other$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,800
Median grant
2
States reached
$10k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VARIOUS CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS$3,432
JEWISH CONVEERSATION$2,818
TOMCHEI SHABBOS$1,800
COLEL CHABAD$1,800
AMERICANS FOR A SAFE ISRAEL$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%KIDS WISH NETWORK: $100 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
NJ
CA
MO
MD
KS
DC
HI
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$37k · 5 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +95% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
22

Total granted

$37k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+95%
-2%

Still filing today

20%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthArts & CultureInternationalPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VC
    VARIOUS CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS
    7× · 2018–2024 · $20k
  • JC
    JEWISH CONVERSATION INC
    4× · 2017–2024 · $9k
  • RC
    RUTGERS CHABAD CENTER
    3× · 2017–2019 · $5k

Funded once

  • PF
    PARLEY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue -6%
  • SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $658 · revenue +36%
  • CF
    CETERA FOUNDATION FUNDRAISE
    one grant, 2022 · $537

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

2
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
3
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
4
American Israel Public Affairs Committee

To strengthen and expand the u.s.-israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.

International
5
National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated

The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.

Community Improvement
6
American Society for Nutrition Inc

The american society for nutrition, inc. (asn) was established to advance health around the world through evidence based nutrition. this is accomplished through innovative programs and services designed to advance knowledge, create and…

Food & Nutrition
7
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
8
The Jewish Women's Archive Inc

The jewish women's archive documents jewish women's stories, elevates their voices, and inspires them to be agents of change.jwa is dedicated to expanding and transforming the historical narrative by restoring jewish women and gender…

Arts & Culture
9
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
10
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

11
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

12
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Epilepsy Foundation of America and the most unlike its peers is The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VARIOUS CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS — $20,452 · OtherVARIOUS CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONSJEWISH CONVERSATION INC — $9,246 · OtherJEWISH CONVERSATION INCRUTGERS CHABAD CENTER — $5,400 · OtherRUTGERS CHABAD CENTERCOLEL CHABAD — $1,800 · OtherTOMCHEI SHABBOS — $1,800 · Other+14 more — $5,227 · Other+14 moreWHYHUNGER INC — $1,070 · Arts & CultureSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC — $658 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $360 · Arts & CulturePARLEY FOUNDATION — $1,107 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $500 · PhilanthropyAMERICANS FOR A SAFE ISRAEL INC — $1,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $398 · InternationalEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $527 · HealthNATIONAL PANCREAS FOUNDATION — $180 · HealthISRAEL CHILDRENS CANCER FOUNDATION INC — $118 · HealthPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA — $100 · HealthKIDS WISH NETWORK INC — $100 · Human Services
Other$43,925Arts & Culture$2,088Philanthropy$1,607International$1,398Health$925Human Services$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPARLEY FOUNDATION — $1,107 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWHYHUNGER INC — $1,070 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICANS FOR A SAFE ISRAEL INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC — $658 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $527 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $398 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH — $298 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PANCREAS FOUNDATION — $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL CHILDRENS CANCER FOUNDATION INC — $118 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS WISH NETWORK INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PARLEY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WHYHUNGER INC
  • Who funds AMERICANS FOR A SAFE ISRAEL INC
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC
  • Who funds EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA
  • Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
  • Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH
  • Who funds NATIONAL PANCREAS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ISRAEL CHILDRENS CANCER FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds KIDS WISH NETWORK INC
  • Who funds PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Peller Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 22%
  • Epilepsy Foundation of America22% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph