Skip to content

· Private foundation

Peck Foundation Milwaukee Ltd

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$754k
Granted FY2025still arriving
54
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$119k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$2.8MAnimals$709kEducation$681kHealth$405kHuman Services$328kPhilanthropy$166kHousing & Shelter$61kReligion$58kOther$0
02FY2025 · 54 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k38 grants · $103k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $131k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $520k
$3,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF MILWAUKEE COUNTY$119,350
VISION FORWARD$100,000
BROWARD PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION$100,000
MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM$51,000
NORTHSHORE LIBRARY$50,000
MILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER$50,000
MARCUS CENTER FOR PERFORMING ARTS$50,000
MILWAUKEE YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$24,000
MILWAUKEE BALLET$20,000
FUNDING ARTS BROWARD$17,500
Individual grant recipient$17,000
CONGREGATION SHALOM$11,000
MILWAUKEE INSTITUTE OF ART & DESIGN$11,000
JEWISH HOME & CARE CTR FOUNDATION$10,000
HEAR WISCONSIN$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $190k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BLOSSOM IDD: $2k → 6%BLOSSOM IDD: $2k → 6%BLOSSOM IDD: $2k → 6%BLOSSOM IDD: $2k → 6%SHARP LITERACY INC: $2k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $11k → 17%SECURE FUTURES: $2k → 17%SECURE FUTURES: $1k → 17%SECURE FUTURES: $1k → 17%SECURE FUTURES: $1k → 17%SECURE FUTURES: $1k → 17%HEAR WISCONSIN: $10k → 17%HEAR WISCONSIN: $10k → 17%HEAR WISCONSIN: $10k → 17%HEAR WISCONSIN: $5k → 17%HEAR WISCONSIN: $3k → 17%HEAR WISCONSIN: $500 → 17%JEWISH HOME & CARE CTR FOUNDATION: $12k → 17%JEWISH HOME & CARE CTR FOUNDATION: $12k → 17%JEWISH HOME & CARE CTR FOUNDATION: $11k → 17%JEWISH HOME & CARE CTR FOUNDATION: $11k → 17%JEWISH HOME & CARE CTR FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%JEWISH HOME & CARE CTR FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%JEWISH HOME & CARE CTR FOUNDATION: $8k → 17%JEWISH HOME & CARE CTR FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $3k → 17%JEWISH HOME & CARE CTR FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%JOURNEY HOUSE: $10k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER: $6k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 17%JOURNEY HOUSE: $4k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER: $3k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER: $3k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER: $3k → 17%JOURNEY HOUSE: $3k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 17%JOURNEY HOUSE: $2k → 17%JOURNEY HOUSE: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
AZ
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.1M · 79 repeat orgs$109k to everyone else

79 repeat relationships: 44 still active in FY2025, 35 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

79
48

Total granted

$5.1M
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+23%

Still filing today

61%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesEducationEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MILWAUKEE BALLET COMPANY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $607k · revenue +5%
  • MILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $186k · revenue +91%
  • MA
    MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $164k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $11k · revenue +36%
  • MJ
    MILWAUKEE JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
  • CY
    COA YOUTH & FAMILY
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Milwaukee Public Theatre Inc

Making the arts accessible to all

—
2
Milwaukee Youth Arts Center Inc

To provide the finest collaborative environment for: supporting performing arts training and education for a diverse population of youth; nurturing youth from diverse ethnic, cultural, and socioeconomic backgrounds, instilling life-skills…

Arts & Culture
3
Museum of Wisconsin Art Inc

The museum of wisconsin art celebrates the value, diversity, and uniqueness of the visual arts and artists of wisconsin. this is achieved by collecting, conserving, documenting, exhibiting, and promoting aesthetic understanding of the…

Arts & Culture
4
Milwaukee Youth Arts Center Foundation Inc

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable and educational purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code ("irc") and for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to…

Arts & Culture
5
Milwaukee Women Inc

Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

Education
6
South Milwaukee Performing Arts Council

Support the south milwaukee performing arts center and community arts

Arts & Culture
7
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
8
Nonprofit Center of Milwaukee Inc

To promote interests and effectiveness of the nonprofit sector through strengthening organizational capacity, expanding volunteerism and encouraging collaboration.

—
9
Milwaukee Bar Association Inc

The mission of the milwaukee bar association is to be an inclusive, equitable and diverse organization that serves the interests of the lawyers, judges and the people of milwaukee county by working to promote the professional interests of…

—
10
Arts Midwest Incorporated

Arts Midwest works collaboratively with private and public arts supporters to support, inform, and celebrate arts organizations and creative communities across the Midwest. Our mission is to build unprecedented opportunity across the…

Arts & Culture
11
Artworks for Milwaukee Inc

ArtWorks mission is preparing youth for tomorrow by providing transferable career skills through arts internships today. More than 1,450 high school students have completed ArtWorks internships since our inception.

Arts & Culture
12
Wisconsin Chamber Orchestra Inc

Strengthen communities by providing high-quality and innovative artistic experiences that entertain, inspire, and unite diverse audiences.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is First Stage Milwaukee; the most unlike its peers is Sharp Literacy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

81 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 81 of the 140 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
79/81
Grantees still filing
55/81
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BROWARD PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION INC: $828,000 · OtherBROWARD PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION INCMEDICAL COLLEGE OF WI: $507,000 · OtherMEDICAL COLLEGE OF WIMARCUS CENTER FOR PERFORMING ARTS: $203,000 · OtherMARCUS CENTER FOR PERFORMING ARTSJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $104,400 · OtherNORTHSHORE LIBRARY: $100,000 · Other+80 more: $730,750 · Other+80 moreMILWAUKEE BALLET COMPANY INC: $606,700 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE BALLET COMPANY INCMILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC: $186,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER IN…MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $164,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INCMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC: $161,500 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INCFUNDING ARTS BROWARD INC: $152,500 · Arts & CultureFUNDING ARTS BROWARD INC+19 more: $160,250 · Arts & Culture+19 moreZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF MILWAUKEE CTY: $676,000 · AnimalsZOOLOGICAL SOC…+1 more: $500 · AnimalsPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC: $133,200 · HealthVISION FORWARD ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED: $121,900 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN INC: $40,300 · HealthPENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $22,000 · HealthABCD INC: $20,500 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Health+3 more: $7,500 · HealthJEWISH HOME AND CARE CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $80,100 · Human ServicesHEAR Wisconsin Inc: $38,000 · Human ServicesJOURNEY HOUSE INC: $31,500 · Human ServicesUNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $22,000 · Human ServicesSOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC: $11,000 · Human ServicesBlossom IDD Inc: $8,000 · Human Services+3 more: $11,000 · Human ServicesMILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $156,000 · PhilanthropyFOX POINT BAYSIDE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $11,000 · Philanthropy+5 more: $10,000 · PhilanthropyURBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC: $27,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF SCHLITZ AUDUBON NATURE CENTER INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentMILWAUKEE PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · Environment+1 more: $200 · Environment
Other$2,473,150Arts & Culture$1,430,950Animals$676,500Health$365,400Human Services$201,600Philanthropy$177,000Environment$35,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBROWARD PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION INC: $828,000 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF MILWAUKEE CTY: $676,000 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE BALLET COMPANY INC: $606,700 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetMILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC: $186,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $164,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC: $161,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetMILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $156,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetFUNDING ARTS BROWARD INC: $152,500 over 9y, 12% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC: $133,200 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetVISION FORWARD ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED: $121,900 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetMILWAUKEE INSTITUTE OF ART & DESIGN INC: $80,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH HOME AND CARE CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $80,100 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $60,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC: $45,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN INC: $40,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHEAR Wisconsin Inc: $38,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTHWOODS INC: $32,500 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetJOURNEY HOUSE INC: $31,500 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetACTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $28,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetURBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC: $27,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetVenetian Arts Society Inc: $22,500 over 9y, 2.9% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $22,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $22,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetABCD INC: $20,500 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE FILM INC: $19,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMETA HOUSE INC: $17,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetImagine MKEInc: $17,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetCAMP THUNDERBIRD CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $16,000 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL MILWAUKEE: $14,100 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetFIRST STAGE MILWAUKEE: $13,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UWM FOUNDATION INC: $11,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOX POINT BAYSIDE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $11,000 over 6y, 5.3% of budgetSOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC: $11,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALVERNO COLLEGE: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBlossom IDD Inc: $8,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE CHAMBER THEATRE LTD: $7,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSECUREFUTURES FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBONNET HOUSE INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetRENAISSANCE THEATERWORKS INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetRADIO MILWAUKEE INC: $5,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRUACH INC: $5,250 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S OUTING ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOLY CROSS HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF SCHLITZ AUDUBON NATURE CENTER INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGREAT LAKES BAROQUE LTD: $5,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetSafe & Sound Inc: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BROWARD PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF MILWAUKEE CTY ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE BALLET COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FUNDING ARTS BROWARD INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds VISION FORWARD ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE INSTITUTE OF ART & DESIGN INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH HOME AND CARE CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds HEAR Wisconsin Inc ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTHWOODS INC ↗
  • Who funds JOURNEY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds ACTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds URBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Venetian Arts Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ABCD INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE FILM INC ↗
  • Who funds META HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Imagine MKEInc ↗
  • Who funds CAMP THUNDERBIRD CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Herbert H Kohl Charities IncWI77.6× affinity38 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Milwaukee Jewish Federation Inc · Bert L and Patricia S Steigleder Charitable · Harri Hoffmann Family Foundation Inc · Ralph Evinrude Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Gardner Foundation · Richard and Ethel Herzfeld Foundation Inc · Anon Charitable Trust · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Peck Foundation Milwaukee Ltd funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Peck Foundation Milwaukee Ltd. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Nova Southeastern University Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Holy Cross Hospital Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
24report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Peck Foundation Milwaukee Ltd?

Find your warmest path to Peck Foundation Milwaukee Ltd through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 140 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Peck Foundation Milwaukee Ltd’s filings →

More from the funding graph