Skip to content

· Private foundation

Peck Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$66k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$50kHealth$45kFood & Nutrition$44kAnimals$22kInternational$21kEmployment$19kYouth Development$13kHousing & Shelter$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICARES$8,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY$8,000
HADASSA$6,000
CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK$4,500
BRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION$4,000
FANS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY REGONAL ANIMAL SHELTER$3,000
MOGAN DAVID ADOM$3,000
TEXAS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL HOUSTON$3,000
GAPS$3,000
TEXAS HUMANE HEROES$3,000
ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF AUSTIN$3,000
SHRINE HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$3,000
BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN$2,500
FRIENDS OF CITY OF GT LIBRARY$2,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 17% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%BRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 9%Bridgeport Rescue Mission: $1k → 9%BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN: $5k → 6%Brookwood in Georgetown: $5k → 6%BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN: $3k → 6%BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN: $3k → 6%BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN: $2k → 6%BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN: $2k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$233k · 21 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
14

Total granted

$233k
$47k

Still filing today

43%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsFood & NutritionHealthYouth DevelopmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $21k · revenue +35%
  • BI
    BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $19k · revenue +39%
  • CH
    CONNECTICUT HUMANE SOCIETY
    5× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • TR
    TORNADO RELIEF AMERICARES
    one grant, 2021 · $9k
  • PP
    Planned Parenthood TX
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Humane Society of Austin & Travis County Inc

The austin humane society (ahs) offers comprehensive, humane, life-saving animal services, transforming the lives of animals and those who love them. because we believe homeless animals deserve a chance to thrive in a loving environment,…

Animals
2
Houston Pets Alive

Houston Pets Alive!s (HPA!) mission is to save the lives of at-risk companion cats and dogs and find them loving homes.

Animals
3
Humane Society of Harris County

Humane Society of Harris County's mission remains steadfast: to provide high-quality adoption, transport, foster, Trap, neuter, release, and pet food pantry services to our community. Yet, with a fresh perspective and a renewed passion,…

—
4
Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement
5
Central Texas Spca

Rescue neglected, unwanted homeless dogs and cats nurture and provide shelter until they are placed with a forever family strive to reduce animal overpopulation prevent cruelty to animals teach responsible pet ownership through an outreach…

Animals
6
Helotes Humane Society

Rescue and place abandoned and unwanted pets. Provide low cost spay / neuter. Provide low-cost microchips. Provide community education.

Animals
7
Austin Habitat for Humanity Inc

Through faith in action, austin habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
8
Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning and Preventative Health

Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning and Preventative Health provides comprehensive and complementary health care services in settings that preserve and protect the essential privacy and rights of the individual, advocates…

Health
9
Brighter Bites Inc

To create communities of health through fresh food. Brighter Bites seeks to improve health outcomes among children and families in under-resourced communities by using data-driven, evidence-based strategies for providing fresh produce and…

Food & Nutrition
10
Aggieland Humane Society

To provide humane shelter, care and placement for stray and unwanted animals, and to promote the human-animal bond and responsible pet ownership to enhance the quality of life for the people and animals in our community.

Animals
11
Humane Society of Central Texas

As an advocate for the community goal of maintaining its no kill status, the humane society provides adoption, rescue and foster opportunities for the homeless animals at the city of waco animal shelter, as well as community education…

Animals
12
Food Bank of West Central Texas

To procure and distribute nutritional food to qualified agencies that feed the hungry of West Central Texas.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bridgeport Rescue Mission Inc; the most unlike its peers is Planned Parenthood. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK: $31,000 · OtherCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANKMOGAN DAVID ADOM: $21,500 · OtherMOGAN DAVID ADOMTHE CARING PLACE: $19,500 · OtherTHE CARING PLACEHADASSA: $10,500 · OtherYOUR RIDE IS HERE INC: $10,000 · OtherHELPING HANDS: $10,000 · OtherGAPS: $9,500 · OtherTORNADO RELIEF AMERICARES: $9,000 · OtherSHRINE HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $8,000 · Other+21 more: $72,000 · Other+21 moreBROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL INC: $19,000 · Human ServicesBROOKWOOD I…BRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION INC: $11,000 · Human ServicesBRIDGEPORT …AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $21,000 · InternationalPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $11,500 · HealthCONNECTICUT HUMANE SOCIETY: $6,000 · AnimalsHumane Heroes Inc: $5,000 · AnimalsTHE FOOD BANK OF LOWER FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC: $9,500 · Food & NutritionTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY INC: $8,000 · Philanthropy
Other$201,000Human Services$30,000International$21,000Health$11,500Animals$11,000Food & Nutrition$9,500Philanthropy$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $21,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL INC: $19,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $11,500 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetBRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION INC: $11,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FOOD BANK OF LOWER FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC: $9,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA - CAPITOL AREA COUNCIL - TOM WOOTEN TRUST: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCONNECTICUT HUMANE SOCIETY: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHumane Heroes Inc: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBetter ATX: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD BANK OF LOWER FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA - CAPITOL AREA COUNCIL - TOM WOOTEN TRUST ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Humane Heroes Inc ↗
  • Who funds Better ATX ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC10.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Peck Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Peck Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Peck Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph