Skip to content
PDS&P Mehta Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

PDS&P Mehta Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$64k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$49k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$105kRecreation & Sports$50kReligion$12kPublic Benefit$6kEducation$5kFood & Nutrition$5kHuman Services$4kArts & Culture$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $59k
$1,427
Median grant
2
States reached
$55k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION$49,400
Individual grant recipient$10,000
BAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION$1,427
HINDU TEMPLE OF KY$1,365
PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION$1,000
CENTER FOR GIFTED STUDIES$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SRI RAMANA MAHARSHI CENTER: $2k → 7%MA CENTER LA: $2k → 9%PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%CENTRAL TEXAS FOOD BANK: $1k → 10%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $100 → 14%TEXAS A&M: $50k → 22%FEEDING TAMPA BAY: $1k → 13%REFUGEE ONE: $500 → 14%SALVATION ARMY: $889 → 9%BAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION: $49k → 13%PRICHARD COMMITTEE: $10k → 15%HINDU TEMPLE OF KY: $3k → 15%CENTER FOR GIFTED STUDIES: $2k → 18%GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $1k → 14%BAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION: $49k → 13%PRICHARD COMMITTEE: $5k → 15%HINDU TEMPLE OF KY: $2k → 15%CENTER FOR GIFTED STUDIES: $1k → 18%GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $1k → 14%CENTRAL KENTUCKY COMMUNIT: $2k → 13%PRICHARD COMMITTEE: $1k → 15%HINDU TEMPLE OF KY: $2k → 15%CENTER FOR GIFTED STUDIES: $1k → 18%CENTRAL KENTUCKY COMMUNIT: $2k → 13%PRICHARD COMMITTEE: $1k → 15%HINDU TEMPLE OF KY: $1k → 15%CENTER FOR GIFTED STUDIES: $500 → 18%BAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION: $1k → 13%PRICHARD COMMITTEE: $600 → 15%HINDU TEMPLE OF KY: $1k → 15%CENTER FOR GIFTED STUDIES: $500 → 18%CENTRAL KENTUCKY COMMUNIT: $1k → 13%PRICHARD COMMITTEE: $250 → 15%HINDU TEMPLE OF KY: $1k → 15%CENTER FOR GIFTED STUDIES: $500 → 18%ETOWN NUTRITION SERVICES: $1k → 13%WKU FOUNDATION: $250 → 18%WARM BLESSINGS: $1k → 13%CENTRAL KENTUCKY COMMUNIT: $1k → 13%WARM BLESSINGS: $750 → 13%COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC: $500 → 13%COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC: $500 → 13%COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC: $500 → 13%HARDIN MEMORIAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $500 → 13%BAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION: $500 → 13%BAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION: $500 → 13%COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC: $500 → 13%BAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION: $500 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
CA
KY
VA
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$159k · 12 repeat orgs$61k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
12

Total granted

$159k
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+10%

Still filing today

42%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHealthHuman ServicesReligionEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $2k · revenue +17%
  • WB
    Warm Blessings INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $2k · revenue +58%
  • GI
    GREENSPACE INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $400 · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • TA
    TEXAS A&M
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • MC
    MA CENTER LA
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • SR
    SRI RAMANA MAHARSHI CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
2
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
3
Greater Boston Food Bank Inc

Our costs consist of acquiring, sorting and distributing food to 617 member agencies, transportation and logistics, and community outreach to 69 direct distribution sites such as gbfb mobile markets, and federal distributions for low…

—
4
God's Pantry Food Bank Inc

The mission of god's pantry food bank is reducing hunger by working together to feed kentucky communities. god's pantry food bank envisions a nourished life for every kentuckian.

—
5
Gleaners Food Bank of Indiana Inc

Gleaners' mission is to be a leader in the fight against hunger. we do this by joining with others to optimize equitable access to nutritious food for those of us facing hunger and working to overcome the conditions causing food insecurity.

—
6
Chattanooga Area Food Bank Inc

To lead a network of partners and unite the community to eliminate hunger by feeding, nourishing, and empowering those we serve.

Food & Nutrition
7
Harvest Hope Food Bank

Harvest hope is on a mission to eliminate hunger and food insecurity in south carolina. we rescue nutritious food from stores throughout the state and distribute it to food pantries, shelters, and soup kitchens. we operate programs that…

Food & Nutrition
8
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
9
Northern Illinois Food Bank

With the support of our community, we provide over 90 million meals annually through our network of over 900 member food pantries and programs across thirteen counties, currently reaching over a half million individuals each month with…

Food & Nutrition
10
Freestore Foodbank Inc

Improve lives by eliminating hunger in partnership with our community.

Food & Nutrition
11
Arkansas Foodbank

None

Food & Nutrition
12
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc; the most unlike its peers is Greenspace Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION: $101,500 · OtherBAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATIONTEXAS A&M: $50,001 · OtherTEXAS A&MIndividual grant recipient: $18,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHINDU TEMPLE OF KY: $9,962 · Other+11 more: $30,160 · Other+11 moreGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $2,000 · Food & NutritionWarm Blessings INC: $1,750 · Food & NutritionFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC: $1,000 · Food & NutritionCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $1,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC: $2,000 · HealthPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $200 · HealthAARP FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Human ServicesREFUGEEONE: $500 · ReligionGREENSPACE INC: $400 · Environment
Other$209,723Food & Nutrition$5,750Health$3,200Human Services$1,000Religion$500Environment$400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWarm Blessings INC: $1,750 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAARP FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBaptist Health Foundation Hardin: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGEEONE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREENSPACE INC: $400 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds Warm Blessings INC ↗
  • Who funds PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC ↗
  • Who funds AARP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds Baptist Health Foundation Hardin ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEEONE ↗
  • Who funds GREENSPACE INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Central Kentucky Comm…Amazonsmile Foundation
Central Kentucky Community Foundation IncKY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Central Kentucky Community Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization PDS&P Mehta Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from PDS&P Mehta Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on PDS&P Mehta Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home