Skip to content
Pci Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Pci Foundation

Mission of the foundation is to foster educational initiatives focused on innovative approaches to the integrated and sustainable use of precast concrete design, fabrication, and construction.

$385k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$3.2M
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$80,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$598k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN FLORIDA$80,000
NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY$80,000
UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA$71,000
TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 24%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY: $50k → 24%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MN
WI
MA
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
DE
AZ
KS
NC
SC
HI
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

18%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$564k · 5 repeat orgs$2.5M to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
30

Total granted

$564k
$2.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+45%

Still filing today

20%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $381k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NS
    NC STATE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2017–2023 · $200k
  • BO
    BOARD OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA
    2× · 2019–2022 · $150k
  • CU
    CLEMSON UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2018–2024 · $85k

Funded once

  • RV
    RECTOR & VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -16%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University Foundation
—
2
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
5
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
6
University of Denver

The university of denver (du) is a higher educational institution, providing both undergraduate and graduate degrees - the mission of the university of denver is to promote learning by engaging with students (continued on schedule o)in…

Education
7
Portland State University Foundation

Portland state university foundation is responsible for raising and managing private resources to advance psu's priorities and mission to be a leading urban university.

—
8
Missouri Western State University Foundation Inc

The missouri western state university foundation is a not-for-profit charitable organization that functions solely to support the mission of missouri western state university, as stated in the university's mission statement. the foundation…

—
9
Trustees of Clark University

Clark university's mission is to educate undergraduate and graduate students to be imaginative and contributing citizens of the world, and to advance the frontiers of knowledge and understanding through rigorous scholarship and creative…

Education
10
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
11
The University Foundation At Sacramento State

Raise private resources to advance the mission and priorities of the university and serve as ambassadors in the community. provide stewardship in the prudent investment of resources and ensure the integrity of the foundation through…

Education
12
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kansas State University Foundation; the most unlike its peers is McNeese State University Alumni Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NC STATE UNIVERSITY: $199,998 · OtherNC STATE UNIVERSITYBOARD OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $150,000 · OtherBOARD OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMARECTOR & VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $100,000 · OtherVIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE & STATE UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · OtherMISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · OtherAUBURN UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · OtherFLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · OtherGEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $100,000 · OtherCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SACRAMENTO: $100,000 · OtherARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY: $85,000 · OtherCLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $85,000 · OtherCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY: $81,562 · OtherNORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY: $80,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA: $80,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $75,000 · Other+8 more: $407,691 · Other+8 moreUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $100,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST…THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $100,000 · EducationTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE ED…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $80,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNS…THE UWM FOUNDATION INC: $80,000 · EducationTHE UWM FOUNDATION INCUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION: $80,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATIONCALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $80,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVER…WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $75,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $60,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAFOUNDATION AT NJ INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $60,000 · EducationFOUNDATION AT NJ INSTITUTE OF TECHN…KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $54,135 · EducationKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONFLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · EducationChico State Enterprises: $45,865 · Education+2 more: $45,000 · EducationMississippi State University Foundation Inc: $50,000 · Human ServicesUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY VARSITY LETTERMANS ASSOCIATION INC: $25,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$2,144,251Education$1,010,000Human Services$50,000Recreation & Sports$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $80,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UWM FOUNDATION INC: $80,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $60,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION AT NJ INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $60,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $54,135 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMississippi State University Foundation Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMcNeese State University Alumni Association: $50,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetChico State Enterprises: $45,865 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY VARSITY LETTERMANS ASSOCIATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetKENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

National Collegiate A…
National Collegiate Athletic AssociationIN13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Collegiate Athletic Association

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pci Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pci Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 25%
  • University of Delaware: 25% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Pci’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home