Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Paul W Blake and Virginia Blake Mem Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$282k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$37k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 98% of PAUL W BLAKE AND VIRGINIA BLAKE MEM FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST VINCENT DE PAUL PARISH$37,345
OUR LADY OF PEACE SCHOOL$30,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA$25,000
ORCHARD PARK HOSPITAL$25,000
ST MARYS SCHOOL$25,000
ST MARYS CENTRAL SCHOOL$20,000
CORPUS CHRISTI GRADE SCHOOL$20,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL SCHOOL$20,000
ST MICHAEL PARISH SCHOOL$20,000
ST JOSEPH THE WORKER GRADE SCHOOL$10,000
MADONNA HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
CATHOLIC CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
BISHOP MUSSIO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$10,000
WHEELING CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHO$10,000
ST PAUL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA: $25k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA: $15k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.8M · 15 repeat orgs$134k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
12

Total granted

$1.8M
$109k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+22%

Still filing today

13%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SV
    ST VINCENT DE PAUL SCHOOL
    8× · 2018–2025 · $305k
  • OL
    OUR LADY OF PEACE SCHOOL
    8× · 2018–2025 · $215k
  • SM
    ST MARYS SCHOOL
    8× · 2018–2025 · $205k

Funded once

  • OL
    OUR LADY OF PEACE SCHOOL HVAC SYSTEM GRANT
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • SJ
    ST JOHNS CENTRAL CATHOLIC SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • SV
    ST VINCENT DE PAUL PARISH - BOILER PROJECT
    one grant, 2018 · $12k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/5
Grantees still filing
3/5
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST VINCENT DE PAUL SCHOOL — $304,710 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAUL SCHOOLOUR LADY OF PEACE SCHOOL — $215,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF PEACE SCHOOLST MARYS SCHOOL — $205,000 · OtherST MARYS SCHOOLST MARYS CENTRAL SCHOOL — $190,000 · OtherST MARYS CENTRAL SCHOOLCORPUS CHRISTI GRADE SCHOOL — $160,000 · OtherCORPUS CHRISTI GRADE SCHOOLST MICHAEL PARISH SCHOOL — $156,500 · OtherST MICHAEL PARISH SCHOOLWHEELING CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHO — $140,000 · OtherWHEELING CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOST JOSEPH THE WORKER GRADE SCHOOL — $80,000 · OtherWHEELING CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL — $80,000 · Other+17 more — $364,675 · Other+17 moreCATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC — $40,000 · Human ServicesBLUE STREAM FARMS CORPORATION — $1,500 · Youth Development
Other$1,895,885Human Services$40,000Youth Development$1,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSPRINGFIELD CATHOLIC CENTRAL SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetLAUGHLIN COMMUNITY CENTER — $4,370 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC
  • Who funds SPRINGFIELD CATHOLIC CENTRAL SCHOOL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HOLY FAMILY CHILD CARE & DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC
  • Who funds LAUGHLIN COMMUNITY CENTER
  • Who funds BLUE STREAM FARMS CORPORATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for the Ohio Valley IncWV13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for the Ohio Valley Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Paul W Blake and Virginia Blake Mem Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Paul W Blake and Virginia Blake Mem Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Paul W Blake and Virginia Blake Mem Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph