How much did PAUL PALANK MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2023?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 55% of PAUL PALANK MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

childrens

2021

childrens

2022

childrens

2023

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

$10k–50k23 grants · $525k
$50k–250k1 grant · $50k

$25,000

Median grant

States reached

$10M

Total assets

Largest grants

CHILDREN'S HARBOR$50,000
KRISTI HOUSE$30,000
FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER$30,000
FLITE$30,000
AMERICANS FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE$30,000
VOICES FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION$30,000
VOICES FOR CHILDREN OF BROWARD$30,000
FOSTER CARE REVIEW$25,000
EDUCATE TOMORROW$25,000
FUMCH$25,000
HANDY$25,000
FAMILY CENTRAL$25,000
PROPELLING INTO TRIUMPH$25,000
GOODMAN JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES$25,000
FLORIDA'S CHILDREN FIRST$25,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $716k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 12%. 96% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.2M · 28 repeat orgs$179k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.

28 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2023, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.2M

$79k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%

+31%

Still filing today

43%

25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesCrime & LegalInternationalYouth DevelopmentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CH
CHILDREN'S HARBOR
4× · 2020–2023 · $233k · revenue +12%
ET
EDUCATE TOMORROW
4× · 2020–2023 · $140k · revenue +107%
FR
FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER
4× · 2020–2023 · $110k · revenue +2%

Funded once

RG
REYNA GROUP HOME
one grant, 2021 · $25k
C
CHILDNETgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +31%
H
HOMES
one grant, 2022 · $19k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

—

Children's Case Management Organization

Families first of palm beach county's mission is empowering families of all histories and challenges to grow strong in every way. strong empowered families create healthy, resilient homes and communities for generations to come.

Environment

Family & Children Services Inc

Family & children services strengthens the safety and well being of children, individuals and families; accomplished by providing a comprehensive program of critical human services.

Human Services

Family and Children's Service Inc

Family and children's service provides compassionate care, intervention and education to support people during challenging times in their lives

Human Services

Family Nurturing Center of Florida

To provide a nurturing environment for families impacted by divorce, custody battles, and domestic violence, by keeping children safe during these challenging times and helping parents foster positive relationships with their children.

Crime & Legal

Fosteradopt Connect Inc

To provide foster and adoptive children a stable, loving, and nuturing family environment by support and advocacy for abused and neglected children and the families caring for them.

Human Services

Family & Children's Council

To prevent child abuse and strengthen families.

Crime & Legal

Miami Childrens Initiative Inc

The mission is to create a community-based network that develops coordinates and provides quality education accessible health care youth development programs opportunities for employment and safe neighborhoods for children and families…

Community Improvement

Family Resources

To treat and prevent child abuse by strengthening families.

Human Services

Institute for Child and Family

The institute for child and family health is committed to empowering the children, youth and families of miami-dade county, florida by providing services that enhance their emotional, physical and educational well-being.

—

Child Protection Center Inc

To provide forensic interviews of children alleged to have been abused and to provide support, education, and mental health services to their caretakers.

Crime & Legal

Families First Inc

For all children and families to be resilient, moving from survival to stability to success.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids in Distress Inc and the most unlike its peers is Propelling Into Triumph Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

15/16

Grantees still filing

16/16

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,313,750Human Services$716,000Crime & Legal$158,750International$140,000Education$26,250Youth Development$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Batchelor Foundation IncFL24.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Batchelor Foundation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc · United Way Miami Inc · Truist Foundation Inc · The Miami Foundation Inc · Peacock Foundation Inc · Florida Panthers Foundation Inc · Dunspaugh Dalton Foundation Inc · The Jim Moran Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation PAUL PALANK MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

8get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

high risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 300828678 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 23% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Paul Palank Memorial Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Paul Palank Memorial Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

PAUL PALANK MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Paul Palank Memorial Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

PAUL PALANK MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Paul Palank Memorial Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph