Skip to content

· Private foundation

Paul and Betty McDonald Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$49k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$67kAnimals$58kHuman Services$51kPhilanthropy$43kArts & Culture$42kYouth Development$26kHealth$19kScience & Tech$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$721k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHIMP HAVEN$11,225
SOUTHFIELD SCHOOL$7,500
YMCA OF NORTHWEST LOUISIANA - BHP BILLITON$5,000
SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$3,500
SHREVEPORT GREEN$3,000
ROBINSON FILM CENTER$3,000
SHREVE MEMORIAL LIBRARY FOUNDATION$2,500
THE GLEN RETIREMENT SYSTEM$2,000
PET SAVERS INC$2,000
THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$2,000
SHREVEPORT OPERA$1,000
GIRL SCOUTS OF ALASKA$1,000
CENTENARY COLLEGE OF LOUISIANA$1,000
GIRL SCOUTS OF LOUISIANA$1,000
USS KIDD VETERANS MEMORIAL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE GLEN RETIREMENT SYSTEM: $12k → 22%THE GLEN RETIREMENT SYSTEM: $10k → 22%THE GLEN RETIREMENT SYSTEM: $2k → 22%THE GLEN RETIREMENT SYSTEM: $2k → 22%THE GLEN RETIREMENT SYSTEM: $2k → 22%THE GLEN RETIREMENT SYSTEM: $2k → 22%THE GLEN RETIREMENT SYSTEM: $2k → 22%THE GLEN RETIREMENT SYSTEM: $1k → 22%THE GLEN RETIREMENT SYSTEM: $500 → 22%CADDO COUNCIL ON AGING: $1k → 22%CADDO COUNCIL ON AGING: $1k → 22%CADDO COUNCIL ON AGING: $500 → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$310k · 31 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against -41% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
2

Total granted

$310k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
-41%

Still filing today

45%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CHIMP HAVEN INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $42k · revenue +189%
  • SS
    SOUTHFIELD SCHOOL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $35k · revenue +11%
  • TG
    The Glen Retirement System
    9× · 2017–2025 · $31k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • GS
    GIRL SCOUTS OF LA-PINES TO THE GULF (FORMERLY BAYOU GIRL SCOUT COUNCILINC)
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue -41%
  • VO
    VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICAN NORTH LOUISIANA
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lsu Alumni Association

The mission is to protect, promote, and foster the welfare of louisiana state university and to create and nurture mutually beneficial relationships between the university and its alumni and friends. the association, using the talents and…

—
2
Louisiana Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Dedicated to the elimination of animal suffering by providing care and basic medical services for homeless and unwanted animals with the mission to promote, protect, and advance the well-being of louisiana's companion animals.

Animals
3
Deep South Today

Deep south today is a nonprofit network of local newsrooms comprising mississippi today and verite news. with its regional scale and scope, deep south today is providing critical journalism in underserved areas and ensuring its long-term…

Arts & Culture
4
Humane Society of South Mississippi

The mission of the humane society is to save and enhance the lives of pets through cooperative and innovative approaches to adoption, spay/neuter, sheltering and community engagement.

Animals
5
Louisiana Realtors

Louisiana realtors (lr) is a member-based trade association established to assist its members in the business of real estate in louisiana. lr represents its membership on important real estate-related issues to state and federal…

—
6
National Church Residences Chillicothe Land Holdings Inc

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
7
Shreveport Symphony Inc

The mission of the shreveport symphony, inc. is to provide classical music to northwest louisiana communities.the symphony offers diverse programs representing the community it serves in a series of 8 subscription concerts and 4 chamber…

Arts & Culture
8
Greater Greenville Association of Realtors Inc

Providing standards, guidelines, and procedures to those members engaged in practice of the real estate profession

—
9
Louisiana Spca Foundation Inc

To be operated exclusively for the benefit of, to perform functions of and to carry out the purposes of the louisiana society for the prevention of cruelty to animals, which operates to prevent cruelty to animals.

Animals
10
Shreveport Chamber of Commerce

Shreveport chamber of commerce provides various projects thoughout the year for chamber members.

—
11
Christian Care Retirement Apartments Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve

—
12
Invest in Louisiana

To provide sound analysis of state fiscal issues to promote economic prosperity, a rising standard of living, and the opportunity for all citizens to reach their highest potential.

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of North Louisiana; the most unlike its peers is Red River Film Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YMCA OF NORTHWEST LOUISIANA - BHP BILLITON: $17,000 · OtherYMCA OF NORTHWEST LOUISIANA - BHP BILLITONGIRL SCOUTS OF LOUISIANA: $13,100 · OtherGIRL SCOUTS OF LOUISIANACAVE EXPLORATION SOCIETY: $13,000 · OtherCAVE EXPLORATION SOCIETYGIRL SCOUTS OF ALASKA: $11,000 · OtherGIRL SCOUTS OF ALASKASHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $11,000 · OtherSHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDRENSHREVE MEMORIAL LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $9,500 · OtherSHREVE MEMORIAL LIBRARY FOUNDATIONCEDAR GROVE LIBRARY: $9,146 · OtherCEDAR GROVE LIBRARYCENTENARY COLLEGE OF LOUISIANA: $9,000 · OtherCENTENARY COLLEGE OF LOUISIANATHE SPRING STREET MUSEUM: $6,000 · OtherUSS KIDD VETERANS MEMORIAL: $6,000 · OtherOAKLAND CEMETARY PRESERVATION SOCIETY: $5,500 · OtherRED RIVER RADIO NETWORK: $5,250 · OtherSHREVEPORT GREEN: $5,000 · OtherVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA INC: $5,000 · Other+9 more: $24,500 · Other+9 moreCHIMP HAVEN INC: $41,725 · AnimalsCHIMP HAVEN INCPET SAVERS INC: $16,750 · AnimalsPET SAVERS INCCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH LOUISIANA: $42,566 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOU…SOUTHFIELD SCHOOL INC: $35,000 · EducationSOUTHFIELD S…DELTA DELTA DELTA FOUNDATION: $4,000 · EducationDELTA DELTA …The Glen Retirement System: $31,250 · Human ServicesThe Glen R…CADDO COUNCIL ON AGING: $2,500 · Human ServicesCADDO COUN…SHREVEPORT OPERA: $10,000 · Arts & CultureRed River Film Society Inc: $9,500 · Arts & CulturePROVIDENCE HOUSE: $9,000 · Community ImprovementNEIGHBORHOOD FALMOUTH INC: $3,500 · Community Improvement
Other$149,996Animals$58,475Philanthropy$42,566Education$39,000Human Services$33,750Arts & Culture$19,500Community Improvement$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH LOUISIANA: $42,566 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCHIMP HAVEN INC: $41,725 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHFIELD SCHOOL INC: $35,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetThe Glen Retirement System: $31,250 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPET SAVERS INC: $16,750 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF ALASKA: $11,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSHREVEPORT OPERA: $10,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetRed River Film Society Inc: $9,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCENTENARY COLLEGE OF LOUISIANA: $9,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE HOUSE: $9,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSHREVEPORT GREEN: $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBIOMEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF NORTHWEST LOUISIANA: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDELTA DELTA DELTA FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD FALMOUTH INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCADDO COUNCIL ON AGING: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF LA-PINES TO THE GULF (FORMERLY BAYOU GIRL SCOUT COUNCILINC): $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH LOUISIANA ↗
  • Who funds CHIMP HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHFIELD SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds The Glen Retirement System ↗
  • Who funds PET SAVERS INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF ALASKA ↗
  • Who funds SHREVEPORT OPERA ↗
  • Who funds Red River Film Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds CENTENARY COLLEGE OF LOUISIANA ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds SHREVEPORT GREEN ↗
  • Who funds BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF NORTHWEST LOUISIANA ↗
  • Who funds DELTA DELTA DELTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD FALMOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds CADDO COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF LA-PINES TO THE GULF (FORMERLY BAYOU GIRL SCOUT COUNCILINC) ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of North LouisianaLA32.4× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Louisiana · Carolyn W & Charles T Beaird Family Foundation · The Crow Foundation · The Powers Foundation Inc · Grayson Foundation Inc · J B Atkins Foundation · The Nelson Foundation · Zadeck Family Foundation · Noel Foundation Inc · The Alta and John Franks Foundation · United Way of Northwest Louisiana · Willis-Knighton Medical Center

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Paul and Betty McDonald Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Paul and Betty McDonald Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Paul and Betty McDonald’s filings →

    More from the funding graph