Skip to content

· Public charity

Patriot Majority USA

The organizations mission is to encourage a discussion of economic issues in the united states in order to make america stronger and promote our countrys future economic prosperity.

$2.1M
Granted FY2022
6
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Public Benefit$2.6MCommunity Improvement$540kCivil Rights$200k
02FY2022 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $275k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.8M
$150,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$83k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PATRIOT MAJORITY PAC$1,490,000
THE REGISTRATION PROJECT INC$350,000
FOR A BETTER PHILADELPHIA PAC$150,000
PRESERVE PROTECT AND DEFEND$75,000
AMERICANS FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH$50,000
MAP USA$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 5% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%FOR A BETTER PHILADELPHIA PAC: $150k → 22%PATRIOT MAJORITY PAC: $1.5M → 14%VOTEVETS ACTION FUND: $199k → 12%THE REGISTRATION PROJECT INC: $350k → 14%MAP USA: $15k → 14%HOUSE MAJORITY FORWARD: $75k → 14%OUR COMMUNITY VOTES INC: $200k → 14%CONTANGO FOUNDATION: $125k → 14%AMERICA VOTES ACTION FUND: $55k → 14%AMERICA VOTES ACTION FUND: $50k → 14%PRESERVE PROTECT AND DEFEND: $75k → 14%AMERICANS FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

21%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$682k · 3 repeat orgs$2.6M to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2022, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
5

Total granted

$682k
$619k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+129%

Still filing today

67%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 6% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’22
Community ImprovementPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICANS FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH
    2× · 2019–2022 · $450k · revenue +27%
  • PP
    PRESERVE PROTECT AND DEFEND
    3× · 2019–2022 · $128k · revenue -98%
  • AV
    America Votes
    2× · 2017–2019 · $105k · revenue +495%

Funded once

  • OC
    OUR COMMUNITY VOTES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $200k · revenue -100% · 29% of their budget
  • VA
    VOTEVETS ACTION FUND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $199k · revenue +129%
  • CF
    CONTANGO FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $125k · 76% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Vote for America

Our mission is to increase voting in elections across the United States by offering nonpartisan information primarily across social media and podcast platforms.

Public Benefit
2
Civica Initiatives

Empower people and strengthen democratic institutions

Community Improvement
3
Democratic Policy Institute

Our mission is to strengthen democracy by promoting non-partisan voter registration and education to foster greater citizen participation in elections, while increasing public awareness of voter suppression.

Social Science
4
Us Vote Foundation Inc

Every citizen is a voter. the foundation executes its mission through the development and provision of voter services, information, and election data.

Civil Rights
5
Right Vote Inc
Civil Rights
6
Oklahoma Forward Inc

Oklahoma Forward works to identify what everyday Oklahomans care about, and help to give them a stronger voice in state government. By creating an environment where Oklahoma voters feel empowered, we can encourage a positive conversation…

—
7
Fight Voter Fraud Inc

Fighting voter fraud at federal, state, and local levels.

Civil Rights
8
Defend Democracy Now

Conduct research and expose abuse of authority and power by government authorities and the deleterious effect such actions have on american democracy.

—
9
Article Iv

Our mission is to advance policies that promote freedom and

—
10
Upvote Virginia

Upvote virginia is a democracy reform organization dedicated to elevating the voices of virginia voters through nonpartisan education, advocacy, and grassroots engagement.

Civil Rights
11
Send the Vote Inc

Conduct digital, direct mail and other public communication campaigns to support voter registration and get-out-the-vote efforts.

—
12
Election Watch Inc

Research analyze publish information to public on elections election systems laws and campaign financing.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Map Usa; the most unlike its peers is Contango Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PATRIOT MAJORITY PAC: $1,490,000 · OtherPATRIOT MAJORITY PACAMERICANS FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH: $450,000 · OtherAMERICANS FOR ECONOMIC GROWTHOUR COMMUNITY VOTES INC: $200,000 · OtherOUR COMMUNITY VOTES INCVOTEVETS ACTION FUND INC: $199,000 · OtherVOTEVETS ACTION FUND INCFOR A BETTER PHILADELPHIA PAC: $150,000 · OtherFOR A BETTER PHILADELPHIA PACPRESERVE PROTECT AND DEFEND: $127,500 · OtherCONTANGO FOUNDATION: $125,000 · Other+2 more: $35,000 · OtherTHE REGISTRATION PROJECT INC: $350,000 · Public BenefitTHE REGISTR…America Votes: $104,500 · Community ImprovementHOUSE MAJORITY FORWARD: $75,000 · Community Improvement
Other$2,776,500Public Benefit$350,000Community Improvement$179,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICANS FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH: $450,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetTHE REGISTRATION PROJECT INC: $350,000 over 1y, 92% of budgetOUR COMMUNITY VOTES INC: $200,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetVOTEVETS ACTION FUND INC: $199,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetPRESERVE PROTECT AND DEFEND: $127,500 over 3y, 25% of budgetCONTANGO FOUNDATION: $125,000 over 1y, 76% of budgetHOUSE MAJORITY FORWARD: $75,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMAP USA: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Patriot Majority USA funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Patriot Majority USA. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Patriot Majority USA?

    Find your warmest path to Patriot Majority USA through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Patriot Majority USA’s filings →

    More from the funding graph