· Public charity
Patriot Majority USA
The organizations mission is to encourage a discussion of economic issues in the united states in order to make america stronger and promote our countrys future economic prosperity.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $275k
- $250k+2 grants · $1.8M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PATRIOT MAJORITY PAC | $1,490,000 |
| THE REGISTRATION PROJECT INC | $350,000 |
| FOR A BETTER PHILADELPHIA PAC | $150,000 |
| PRESERVE PROTECT AND DEFEND | $75,000 |
| AMERICANS FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH | $50,000 |
| MAP USA | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 5% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2022, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 6% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.0M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AFAMERICANS FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH2× · 2019–2022 · $450k · revenue +27%
- PPPRESERVE PROTECT AND DEFEND3× · 2019–2022 · $128k · revenue -98%
- AVAmerica Votes2× · 2017–2019 · $105k · revenue +495%
Funded once
- OCOUR COMMUNITY VOTES INCone grant, 2020 · $200k · revenue -100% · 29% of their budget
- VAVOTEVETS ACTION FUND INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $199k · revenue +129%
- CFCONTANGO FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $125k · 76% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to increase voting in elections across the United States by offering nonpartisan information primarily across social media and podcast platforms.
Empower people and strengthen democratic institutions
Our mission is to strengthen democracy by promoting non-partisan voter registration and education to foster greater citizen participation in elections, while increasing public awareness of voter suppression.
Every citizen is a voter. the foundation executes its mission through the development and provision of voter services, information, and election data.
Oklahoma Forward works to identify what everyday Oklahomans care about, and help to give them a stronger voice in state government. By creating an environment where Oklahoma voters feel empowered, we can encourage a positive conversation…
Fighting voter fraud at federal, state, and local levels.
Conduct research and expose abuse of authority and power by government authorities and the deleterious effect such actions have on american democracy.
Our mission is to advance policies that promote freedom and
Upvote virginia is a democracy reform organization dedicated to elevating the voices of virginia voters through nonpartisan education, advocacy, and grassroots engagement.
Conduct digital, direct mail and other public communication campaigns to support voter registration and get-out-the-vote efforts.
Research analyze publish information to public on elections election systems laws and campaign financing.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Map Usa and the most unlike its peers is Contango Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICANS FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH ↗
- Who funds THE REGISTRATION PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds OUR COMMUNITY VOTES INC ↗
- Who funds VOTEVETS ACTION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds PRESERVE PROTECT AND DEFEND ↗
- Who funds CONTANGO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds America Votes ↗
- Who funds HOUSE MAJORITY FORWARD ↗
- Who funds MAP USA ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Patriot Majority USA funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Patriot Majority USA?
Find your warmest path to Patriot Majority USA through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.