Skip to content

· Private foundation

Patricia Mae Adsit Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$546k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$514k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$2.0MHuman Services$40kReligion$34kHealth$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kCrime & Legal$5kAnimals$4kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $250k+1 grant · $514k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Heartland Sings Inc$513,808
Fort Wayne Museum of Art$25,000
Stop Child Abuse Now (SCAN)$5,000
Crossroad Children & Family Services$1,000
Acres Land Trust$1,000
Turnstone Center for Children & Adult Disabilities$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Positive Resource Connection: $1k → 12%SCAN: $15k → 12%SCAN: $12k → 12%SCAN: $6k → 12%SCAN: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 8 repeat orgs$174k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
11

Total granted

$2.1M
$167k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+24%

Still filing today

88%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesAnimalsFood & NutritionEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    Heartland Sings Inc
    7× · 2018–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +76% · 61% of their budget
  • FW
    FORT WAYNE MUSEUM OF ART INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $62k · revenue +200%
  • FW
    FORT WAYNE CHILDREN'S CHOIR INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $10k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $135k
  • PC
    PLYMOUTH CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $22k
  • AR
    American Red Cross of Northeast Indiana
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Bureau Inc

Empowering individuals to build stronger families and communities.

Human Services
2
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
3
Turning Point Inc

Our mission is to provide professional counseling with the highest level of ethical standards to individuals in the community . We believe in health, healing, hope, growth, recovery and transformation as foundational goals for everyone and…

Health
4
New Hope Services Inc

Provide services in response to individual need

Human Services
5
Hoosier Families Inc

Hoosier Families is a non-profit organization that provides Community Based programs for Indiana children and families. Hoosier Families is committed to utilizing evidence-based practices to strengthen, rebuild and reunite the individuals…

Human Services
6
Cardinal Services Inc of Indiana

The mission of cardinal services, inc. of indiana is to assist and advocate for people with disabilities and challenges to live lives full of dignity, growth, and opportunity.

Education
7
Fort Wayne Cinema Center Inc

Cinema center, fort wayne's center for film, provides unique opportunities to explore our world through the art of film.

—
8
Indianapolis Children's Choir

The Indianapolis Chidlrens Choir nurtures and inspires student achievement through quality music education and the pursuit of artistic excellence in choral music performance.

Arts & Culture
9
Fort Wayne Public Television Inc

Pbs fort wayne engages our community through content and collaborations that educate, inform, inspire, and entertain.

Arts & Culture
10
Family & Children's Services Inc D/B/a Headwaters Counseling

Promote, develop and empower individuals, families, and communities to have healthy relationships and make positive life choices.

Human Services
11
Childrens Advocacy Center of Collin County Inc

The mission of children's advocacy center of collin county is to provide safety, healing, and justice to children victimized by abuse and neglect.

Civil Rights
12
Pathway Caring for Children

Our mission is to help children and families realize the possibilities of their lives through foster care, adoption, and mental health. we serve over 1,700 children and families in 14 northeast ohio counties.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Harvest Food Bank of Northeast Indiana Inc; the most unlike its peers is Iris Family Support Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Heartland Sings Inc: $1,946,824 · OtherHeartland Sings IncIndividual grant recipient: $134,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+13 more: $62,850 · OtherFORT WAYNE MUSEUM OF ART INC: $61,700 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $500 · Arts & CultureIRIS FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER INC: $38,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesHUMANE FORT WAYNE INC: $2,530 · AnimalsACRES Inc: $1,000 · EnvironmentCOMMUNITY HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC: $1,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$2,144,174Arts & Culture$62,200Human Services$39,000Animals$2,530Environment$1,000Food & Nutrition$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHeartland Sings Inc: $1,946,824 over 7y, 61% of budgetFORT WAYNE MUSEUM OF ART INC: $61,700 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetIRIS FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER INC: $38,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFORT WAYNE CHILDREN'S CHOIR INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCANCER SERVICES OF ALLEN COUNTY INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHUMANE FORT WAYNE INC: $2,530 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSROAD CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetACRES Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEAST INDIANA POSITIVE RESOURCE CONNECTION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Heartland Sings Inc ↗
  • Who funds FORT WAYNE MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
  • Who funds IRIS FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FORT WAYNE CHILDREN'S CHOIR INC ↗
  • Who funds CANCER SERVICES OF ALLEN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE FORT WAYNE INC ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROAD CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds ACRES Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST INDIANA POSITIVE RESOURCE CONNECTION INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lincoln Financial Foundation IncPA21.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Edward M Wilson Foundation · English-Bonter-Mitchell Fdn · Community Foundation of Greater Fort Wayne Inc · Dr Louis a and Anne B Schneider Fdn · The James Foundation Inc · The Donald F Wood and Darlene M Richardson Foundation Inc · Ian & Miriam Rolland Foundation · Edward D & Ione Auer Foundation Monarch Capital David Meyer Trustee · Olive B Cole Foundation Inc · Howard P Arnold Foundation Inc · The Waterfield Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Patricia Mae Adsit Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Patricia Mae Adsit Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Patricia Mae Adsit’s filings →

    More from the funding graph