Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Pathways in Education Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$76k
Granted FY2024still arriving
100
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$4.0MEducation$1.1M
02FY2024 · 100 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
1
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY$3,125
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY CHANNEL ISLANDS$3,125
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY CHANNEL ISLANDS$3,125
SONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY$3,125
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS$3,125
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS$3,125
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS$3,125
SONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY$3,125
SONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY$3,125
SONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY$3,125
SONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY$3,125
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY CHANNEL ISLANDS$3,125
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY CHANNEL ISLANDS$2,904
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY CHANNEL ISLANDS$2,037
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY$750
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $50k → 9%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY CHANNEL ISLANDS: $69k → 10%SCHOLARSHIPS: $10k → 12%SONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $48k → 9%CSU CHANNEL ISLANDS: $64k → 10%SONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $38k → 9%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY CHANNEL ISLANDS: $59k → 10%SONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $9k → 9%SCHOLARSHIPS: $28k → 10%SCHOLARSHIPS: $9k → 9%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY CHANNEL ISLANDS: $16k → 10%SCHOLARSHIPS: $204k → 11%SONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 9%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY CHANNEL ISLANDS: $3k → 10%CSU SAN MARCOS: $29k → 11%SONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 9%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY CHANNEL ISLANDS: $3k → 10%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS: $20k → 11%SONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 9%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY CHANNEL ISLANDS: $3k → 10%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS: $20k → 11%SONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 9%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY CHANNEL ISLANDS: $3k → 10%SCHOLARSHIPS: $20k → 11%SONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 9%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY CHANNEL ISLANDS: $3k → 10%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS: $3k → 11%SONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 9%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY CHANNEL ISLANDS: $3k → 10%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS: $3k → 11%SONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 9%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY CHANNEL ISLANDS: $3k → 10%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS: $3k → 11%SONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 9%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY CHANNEL ISLANDS: $3k → 10%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS: $3k → 11%SONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 9%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY CHANNEL ISLANDS: $3k → 10%SONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 9%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY CHANNEL ISLANDS: $3k → 10%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS: $3k → 11%SONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 9%CSU NORTHRIDGE: $19k → 14%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE: $19k → 14%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE: $17k → 14%SCHOLARSHIPS: $13k → 14%ROCKY MOUNTAIN PATHWAYS LLC: $4.0M → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
WA
NY
OR
IA
NJ
CA
AZ
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

19%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$960k · 46 repeat orgs$4.1M to everyone else

46 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
23

Total granted

$960k
$4.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+18%

Still filing today

11%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS CORPORATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $62k · revenue +41%
  • DRAKE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2019–2020 · $2k · revenue +11%
  • LA
    LOS ANGELES PACIFIC UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • RM
    ROCKY MOUNTAIN PATHWAYS
    one grant, 2023 · $4.0M · revenue -93%
  • CC
    CSU CHANNEL ISLANDS
    one grant, 2019 · $64k
  • CS
    CSU SAN MARCOS
    one grant, 2019 · $29k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Claremont Graduate University

Claremont Graduate University prepares individuals to be leaders for positive change in the world. Unique in its transdisciplinary approach, the University is dedicated to the creation, dissemination, and application of new knowledge and…

Education
2
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
3
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
4
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
5
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
6
Ashland University

Ashland university, guided by our christian heritage, is a comprehensive, private university that provides a transformative learning experience, shaping graduates who work, serve and lead with integrity in their local, national, and global…

Education
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
9
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
10
Park University

Park university's mission is to transform lives through accessible, student-centered, quality higher education.

Education
11
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education
12
Saint Mary's College of California

Saint mary's college of california invites you to passionately embrace knowledge, the challenges of scholarship, and the capacity to make lasting change in the world. the foundation for this is our mission. to probe deeply the mystery of…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Azusa Pacific University and the most unlike its peers is Rocky Mountain Pathways. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ROCKY MOUNTAIN PATHWAYS — $4,000,000 · OtherROCKY MOUNTAIN PATHWAYSScholarships Incorporated — $302,527 · OtherScholarships IncorporatedCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY CHANNEL ISLANDS — $236,391 · OtherSONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY — $210,156 · Other+62 more — $268,501 · Other+62 moreCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS CORPORATION — $62,313 · Education+9 more — $7,900 · Education
Other$5,017,575Education$70,213

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS CORPORATION — $62,313 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDRAKE UNIVERSITY — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES PACIFIC UNIVERSITY — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCitrus College Foundation — $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPitzer College — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAZUSA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY — $900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMILLS COLLEGE — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetART CENTER COLLEGE OF DESIGN — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetClark Atlanta University Inc — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PATHWAYS
  • Who funds Scholarships Incorporated
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS CORPORATION
  • Who funds DRAKE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES PACIFIC UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Citrus College Foundation
  • Who funds Pitzer College

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Pathways in Education Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Pathways in Education Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Pathways in Education Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph