Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pate-McClintic Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$45k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$191kReligion$86kHealth$19kArts & Culture$14kYouth Development$14kHuman Services$13kPublic Benefit$5kPhilanthropy$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$576k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CARTERET HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$10,000
NC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$10,000
SAINT ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$10,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE COASTAL PLAIN$5,000
CHRIST CHURCH$5,000
NC AQUARIUM SOCIETY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MIRA FOUNDATION USA: $1k → 10%MIRA FOUNDATION USA: $1k → 10%LOWER CAPE FEAR HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%LOWER CAPE FEAR HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 13% of Pate-McClintic Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 74% of the giving stays in NC; by stated purpose, 54%.

Pate-McClintic Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 20% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$305k · 14 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +124% since the first grant, against +51% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
7

Total granted

$305k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+124%
+51%

Still filing today

36%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    SAINT MARYS SCHOOL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $77k · revenue +55%
  • NC
    NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $23k · revenue +232%
  • LC
    Lower Cape Fear Hospice Foundation Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $6k · revenue ×58

Funded once

  • DUKE UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +51%
  • MO
    MAKE-A-WISH OF EASTERN NORTH CAROLINA
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • TG
    THE GEORGE AND BARBARA BUSH FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +44%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Dakota State University Foundation

Building enduring relationships that maximize advocacy and philanthropy to support North Dakota State University.

Education
2
Alamance Community College Foundation

The Alamance Community College Foundation exists to aid students with a demonstrated financial need in reaching their educational goals, while supporting the mission of ACC.

—
3
Unc Health Foundation Inc

At unc health foundation, we inspire philanthropic support for unc health and unc school of medicine that transforms healthcare and provides hope to the people of north carolina and communities around the world.

Education
4
Coastal Educational Foundation

To provide support to coastal carolina university through charitable donations received primarily from individual donors.

—
5
North Carolina State University College of Sciences Foundation Inc

Provide financial support for all types of education and research within the college of sciences at north carolina state university.

Philanthropy
6
The University of North Carolina At Greensboro Investment Fund Inc

To accept the transfer of assets from the uncg endowment fund and the affiliated foundations, which benefit the university, and to manage the investment of those assets.

Education
7
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
8
North Carolina Central University Foundation Inc

The mission of the north carolina central university foundation, inc., is to foster and promote the growth of higher education in north carolina and specifically north carolina central university by whatever name it may be designated, and…

Education
9
The University of North Carolina At Chapel Hill School of Nursing Foundation

The foundation's mission is to foster and promote the growth, progress, and general welfare of nursing education, research and service at the unc-ch school of nursing.

—
10
University of North Carolina School of the Arts Foundation Inc

Uncsa foundation's primary purpose is to financially support the advancement and achievement of the students, faculty, and staff of the university of north carolina school of the arts. the uncsa foundation strives to support the strategic…

Education
11
The University of North Carolina At Chapel Hill Foundation Inc

To aid, support, and promote teaching, research, and service in the various educational, scientific, scholarly, professional, artistic, and creative endeavors of the university of north carolina at chapel hill.

Education
12
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Carolina State University Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mira Foundation Usa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VIRGINIA EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $86,500 · OtherVIRGINIA EPISCOPAL SCHOOLSAINT ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $42,000 · OtherSAINT ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CHURCHCHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $25,000 · OtherCHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCHNSCDA OF NORTH CAROLINA: $14,000 · OtherNSCDA OF NORTH CAROLINACHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $12,000 · Other+13 more: $47,000 · Other+13 moreSAINT MARYS SCHOOL: $76,500 · EducationSAINT MARYS SCHOOLNORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $22,500 · EducationNORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY FO…DUKE UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationTHE GEORGE AND BARBARA BUSH FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationCarteret County General Hospital Foundation: $10,000 · PhilanthropyLower Cape Fear Hospice Foundation Inc: $6,000 · Human ServicesMira Foundation USA Inc: $2,000 · Human Services
Other$226,500Education$109,000Philanthropy$10,000Human Services$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAINT MARYS SCHOOL: $76,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $22,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCarteret County General Hospital Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLower Cape Fear Hospice Foundation Inc: $6,000 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetReligious Community Services of New Bern: $6,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMira Foundation USA Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAINT MARYS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Carteret County General Hospital Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Lower Cape Fear Hospice Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Religious Community Services of New Bern ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE GEORGE AND BARBARA BUSH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE COASTAL PLAIN ↗
  • Who funds Mira Foundation USA Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

North Carolina Community FoundationNC13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: North Carolina Community Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pate-McClintic Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pate-McClintic Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pate-McClintic’s filings →

    More from the funding graph