Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pascucci Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$104k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$161kHousing & Shelter$147kEmployment$100kHealth$36kYouth Development$23kArts & Culture$15kInternational$5kReligion$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$466k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WOODHAVEN$40,000
CENTRAL MISSOURI SUBCONTRACTING ENT$30,000
BOY SCOUTS GREAT RIVERS COUNCIL$10,000
FRIENDS OF THE HISTORIC COLUMBIA$10,000
CRU$10,000
EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF MO KS$3,000
CENTRAL MO HUMAN SOCIETY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 81% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CRU: $10k → 13%MISSOURI SPECIAL OLPYMPICS: $40k → 10%EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF MO KS: $5k → 11%THE GENERAL COUNCIL OF THE ASSEMBLI: $5k → 15%ROCKHURST UNIVERSITY: $5k → 15%CENTRAL MO HUMAN SOCIETY: $1k → 17%RUTGERS BUSINESS SCHOOL: $10k → 8%MISSOURI SPECIAL OLPYMPICS: $20k → 10%EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF MO KS: $3k → 11%ROCKHURST UNIVERSITY: $5k → 15%BRUIN BOOSTER CLUB OF ROCK BRIDGE: $5k → 17%EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF MO KS: $3k → 11%ROCKHURST UNIVERSITY: $5k → 15%WOODHAVEN: $60k → 17%ROCKHURST UNIVERSTIY: $3k → 15%WOODHAVEN: $40k → 17%CENTRAL MISSOURI SUBCONTRACTING ENT: $30k → 17%CENTRAL MISSOURI SUBCONTRACTING ENT: $25k → 17%CENTRAL MISSOURI SUBCONTRACTING ENT: $25k → 17%CENTRAL MISSOURI SUBCONTRACTING ENT: $20k → 17%WOODHAVEN: $15k → 17%WOODHAVEN: $12k → 17%WOODHAVEN: $10k → 17%FRIENDS OF THE HISTORIC COLUMBIA: $10k → 17%BOY SCOUTS GREAT RIVERS COUNCIL: $10k → 17%BOY SCOUTS GREAT RIVERS COUNCIL: $5k → 17%CANCER RESEARCH CTR: $5k → 17%CANCER RESEARCH CTR: $5k → 17%BOY SCOUTS GREAT RIVERS COUNCIL: $5k → 17%WOODHAVEN: $5k → 17%CANCER RESEARCH CTR: $5k → 17%CANCER RESEARCH CTR: $5k → 17%CANCER RESEARCH CTR: $5k → 17%CAMPUS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $5k → 17%WOODHAVEN: $5k → 17%BOY SCOUTS GREAT RIVERS COUNCIL: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$514k · 8 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against -11% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$514k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
-11%

Still filing today

38%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationEmploymentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Indiana University Foundation
    6× · 2018–2023 · $130k · revenue +30%
  • CM
    Central Missouri Subcontracting Enterprises
    4× · 2021–2024 · $100k · revenue +337%
  • RU
    ROCKHURST UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2018–2021 · $18k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • RB
    RUTGERS BUSINESS SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • CL
    CAMPUS LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • TG
    THE GENERAL COUNCIL OF THE ASSEMBLI
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Claremont Graduate University

Claremont Graduate University prepares individuals to be leaders for positive change in the world. Unique in its transdisciplinary approach, the University is dedicated to the creation, dissemination, and application of new knowledge and…

Education
2
Northern Illinois Blood Bank Inc D/B/a Rock River Valley Blood Center

Rock river valley blood center, in partnership with our community, is dedicated to providing safe, high value blood products and services to people in need.

Health
3
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
4
University Corporate Research Park I Inc

To hold title and perform related functions in connection with a research park and innovation center in support of michigan state university research foundation.

—
5
Iit Research Institute

Perform basic research and preclinical efficacy assessments of new molecular entities being developed for the prevention and treatment of cancer and infectious disease. Discover new pathways and targets for the design and development of…

Science & Tech
6
The University of British Columbia

Pursuing excellence in research learning and engagement to foster global citizenship and advance a sustainable and just society across British Columbia Canada and the world.

Education
7
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
8
Cancer Research and Biostatistics

To help conquer cancer and other diseases through the application of biostatistical principles and innovative data management methods.

Health
9
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
10
Central Michigan University Research Corporation

To receive, administer, and distribute funds to promote and encourage research, scholarship, creative activities, and other applied research and technology at CMU.

Education
11
Bradley University

Bradley university empowers students for immediate and sustained success in their personal and professional endeavors by combining professional preparation, liberal arts and sciences, and co-curricular experiences. alongside our dedication…

Education
12
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rockhurst University; the most unlike its peers is Armanis Angels Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/7
Grantees still filing
3/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WOODHAVEN: $147,000 · OtherWOODHAVENIndividual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $25,000 · OtherCANCER RESEARCH CENTERBOY SCOUTS GREAT RIVERS COUNCIL: $23,000 · OtherBOY SCOUTS GREAT RIVERS COUNCILEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF MO KS: $11,000 · Other+7 more: $48,000 · Other+7 moreIndiana University Foundation: $130,000 · EducationIndiana University FoundationROCKHURST UNIVERSITY: $18,000 · EducationROCKHURST UNIVERSITY+1 more: $5,000 · EducationCentral Missouri Subcontracting Enterprises: $100,000 · EmploymentCentral Missouri Su…CENTRAL MISSOURI HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,000 · Animals
Other$314,000Education$153,000Employment$100,000Animals$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIndiana University Foundation: $130,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Missouri Subcontracting Enterprises: $100,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $25,000 over 5y, 8.3% of budgetROCKHURST UNIVERSITY: $18,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL BRIGADES INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRUIN BOOSTER CLUB OF ROCK BRIDGE: $5,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetCENTRAL MISSOURI HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Central Missouri Subcontracting Enterprises ↗
  • Who funds CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ROCKHURST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL BRIGADES INC ↗
  • Who funds BRUIN BOOSTER CLUB OF ROCK BRIDGE ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL MISSOURI HUMANE SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pascucci Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pascucci Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pascucci’s filings →

    More from the funding graph