Skip to content

· Public charity

Partnership for Strong Communities

The partnership promotes equitable change in ct housing policy by coordinating advocacy, advancing research, and uniting diverse partners.

$106k
Granted FY2022
4
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$53k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2022.

Housing & Shelter$256kPhilanthropy$66kHuman Services$45kCommunity Improvement$39kHealth$15k
02FY2022 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $44k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
$33,521
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SUPPORTIVE HOUSING WORKS INC$52,663
JOURNEY HOME INC$33,521
ALWAYS HOME INC$10,577
NEW OPPORTUNITIES INC$9,489
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

None of its grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$290k · 3 repeat orgs$131k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +69% since the first grant, against +34% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
3

Total granted

$290k
$120k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%
+34%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22
PhilanthropyCrime & LegalHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HOUSING COLLECTIVE INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $181k · revenue +106%
  • JH
    JOURNEY HOME INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $65k · revenue +69%
  • NO
    NEW OPPORTUNITIES INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $45k · revenue -15%

Funded once

  • UNITED WAY OF GREATER NEW HAVEN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $66k · revenue +60%
  • TV
    THAMES VALLEY COUNCIL FOR COMMUNITY ACTION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $39k · revenue +34%
  • CH
    CONNECTICUT HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue -1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE HOUSING COLLECTIVE INC: $181,234 · Crime & LegalTHE HOUSING COLLECTIVE INCUNITED WAY OF GREATER NEW HAVEN INC: $66,243 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF GREATER…CONNECTICUT HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · PhilanthropyCONNECTICUT HEALTH FO…JOURNEY HOME INC: $64,521 · Human ServicesJOURNEY HOME INCNEW OPPORTUNITIES INC: $44,554 · OtherNEW OPPORTU…THAMES VALLEY COUNCIL FOR COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $38,961 · Community ImprovementTHAMES VAL…ALWAYS HOME INC: $10,577 · Housing & Shelter
Crime & Legal$181,234Philanthropy$81,243Human Services$64,521Other$44,554Community Improvement$38,961Housing & Shelter$10,577

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE HOUSING COLLECTIVE INC: $181,234 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER NEW HAVEN INC: $66,243 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetJOURNEY HOME INC: $64,521 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNEW OPPORTUNITIES INC: $44,554 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHAMES VALLEY COUNCIL FOR COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $38,961 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONNECTICUT HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALWAYS HOME INC: $10,577 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Liberty Bank Foundation IncCT15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Liberty Bank Foundation Inc · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Partnership for Strong Communities funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Partnership for Strong Communities. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 70%
  • The Housing Collective Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Thames Valley Council for Community Action Inc: 83% of income from government
  • New Opportunities Inc: 70% of income from government
  • Journey Home Inc: 59% of income from government
  • United Way of Greater New Haven Inc: 42% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
4rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Partnership for Strong Communities’ filings →

More from the funding graph