Skip to content
Partnership for America's Health Care Future Action Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Partnership for America's Health Care Future Action Inc

The partnership for america's health care future action, inc.

$150k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Community Improvement$469kPublic Benefit$223kHealth$180kHuman Services$3k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$150,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL TAXPAYERS UNION FOUNDATION$150,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NATIONAL TAXPAYERS UNION FOUNDATION: $150k → 14%CT BENEFIT B ROKERS: $5k → 11%CONNECTICUT RETAIL MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION: $7k → 12%ROCKY MOUNTAIN POLICY GROUP: $63k → 8%VIRGINIA HOSPITAL AND HEALTHCARE ASSOCIATION: $125k → 9%MAINE STATE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $363k → 12%CONNECTICUT BENEFITS BROKERS: $3k → 11%ROCKY MOUNTAIN POLICY GROUP: $30k → 8%CONNECTICUT ASSOCIATION OF HEALTH PLANS INC: $25k → 11%CONNECTICUT RIVER VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $5k → 11%CENTRAL CT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Vermont Chamber of Commerce Inc

Promote business opportunities

—
2
The Hartford Chamber of Commerce Incorporated

To compete aggressively and successfully for jobs, talent and capital.

—
3
Connecticut Business and Industry Association Inc

CBIA is the voice of business in Connecticut, with thousands of member companies championing change at the State Capitol, shaping debate about economic competitiveness and fighting for a better future for all.

—
4
Chamber of Commerce of Eastern Connecticut Inc

The Chamber of Commerce of Eastern Connecticut, Inc. is a collaborative of business and community leaders dedicated to securing and enhancing the economic vitality of eastern Connecticut.

—
5
Connecticut Restaurant Association Inc

CRA is a statewide trade Organization for restaurants and restaurant affiliates. We advocate for members at the State Government level and provide discounted services for members.

—
6
Northern Rhode Island Chamber of Commerce

The northern rhode island chamber of commerce strengthens the economic climate through business leadership that fosters member and community prosperity

—
7
Colorado Chamber of Commerce Fka Co Assn of Commerce & Industry

The colorado chamber of commerce mission is to enhance the business climate of the state of colorado by promoting a positive legislative and regulatory environment and providing programs and services for its members, economic education,…

—
8
Central Rhode Island Chamber of Commerce

To provide members with the opportunity to foster and strengthen business relationships in various settings.

—
9
The Greater New Haven Chamber of Commerce Inc

Provide to its members information, services and special events to expand, promote and develop new business in the greater new haven, connecticut region

—
10
Vermont Chamber of Commerce

To advance the vermont economy by working and supporting a vibrant business climate with a lens of diversity, equity, and inclusion. we advocate, build community, and provide resources for businesses statewide.

—
11
Waltham Chamber of Commerce Inc

The chamber is dedicated to promoting sound economic growth and opportunity for its membership and a strong quality of life for the community through leadership, education, information and advocacy.

—
12
Brookline Chamber of Commerce Inc

To promote and advance the continued success of brookline as a thriving community in which to live, work and do business. the chamber takes a leadership role in the business community for growth, advocacy, information, and networking.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central Ct Chambers of Commerce Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Rocky Mountain Policy Group. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAINE STATE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $362,500 · OtherMAINE STATE CHAMBER OF COMMERCENATIONAL TAXPAYERS UNION FOUNDATION: $150,000 · OtherNATIONAL TAXPAYERS UNION FOUNDATIONVIRGINIA HOSPITAL AND HEALTHCARE ASSOCIATION: $125,000 · OtherVIRGINIA HOSPITAL AND HEALTHCARE ASSOCIATIONROCKY MOUNTAIN POLICY GROUP: $92,500 · OtherROCKY MOUNTAIN POLICY GROUP+7 more: $54,500 · Other+7 moreCOLORADO BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE INC: $89,704 · Community ImprovementCOLORADO BU…
Other$784,500Community Improvement$89,704

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAINE STATE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $362,500 over 1y, 16% of budgetNATIONAL TAXPAYERS UNION FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetVIRGINIA HOSPITAL AND HEALTHCARE ASSOCIATION: $125,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN POLICY GROUP: $92,500 over 2y, 33% of budgetCOLORADO BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE INC: $89,704 over 1y, 11% of budgetCT ASSOCIATION OF HEALTH PLANS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetCONNECTICUT RETAIL MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION: $7,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetTHE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF GREATER WATERBURY CONNECTICUT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCENTRAL CT CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE INCORPORATED: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCONNECTICUT RIVER VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT BENEFIT BROKERS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 4.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Partnership for America's Health Care Future Action Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Partnership for America's Health Care Future Action Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Partnership for America's Health Care Future Action Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Partnership for America's Health Care Future Action Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Partnership for America's Health Care Future Action’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home