Skip to content

· Public charity

Partners for Better Futures

Partners for Better Futures (PBF) helps improve the lives of poor people around the world, primarily focusing on children and education.

$661k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

International$20k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $10,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $660,636 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $650,636 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$303k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Partners Asia$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY24–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Partners Asia: $10k → 10%Partners Asia: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $592k on the FY2026 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

East Asia and the Pacific$296k · 50% · 12 grants

Stated purpose: Apu Palamguwan Cultural Education Center - Philippines. (APC). This grant partially funded ongoing operation of an accredited school that for more than twenty years has provided primary education, and has recently added secondary education, to children and youth in indigenous communities in the southern region of the Philippines. The school utilizes community resources and incorporates awareness of local issues into various learning experiences. The mission of APC is to provide an integrated, holistic, and culturebased education for indigenous children and youth. This is achieved by promoting anddeepening the children's understanding of their unique culture, while providing knowledge and skills that enable them to confidently relate with mainstream Philippine society. This involves instruction in four languages, including English. · Ar Yong Oo Learning Center, a grant for a new school building, for a school that educates mostly Burmese migrant and refugee children. A badly needed new building was completed, and provides a safe learning environment for 150 children in Myanmar. The new school building eliminates risks posed by termite-damaged columns, cracked flooring, and water leakage. Students and teachers have a structurally sound and hazard-free classroom space. With a properly constructed facility that prevents rainwater intrusion, lessons no longerneed to stop during rainfall. This ensures consistent teaching and improved learning outcomes for the two grade groups and Kaw Saw Naw students. The removal of damaged flooring and infestation-prone areas will reduce exposure to harmful insects and unsafe conditions, creating a healthier environment for all students. · DKN School, grant for new building and renovations to existing. This school in Burma has been operating for over 15 years. The existing wooden school building, measuring 60 by 25 feet, currently accommodates a large number of students without any internal classroom partitions. For the current academic year, a total of 156 students from nursery through Grade 8 are attending the school. The teaching staff consists of 11 trained educators serving under a regional faith-based education ministry, all of whom relocated to the village from a major delta region in the country. Because of the central village's critical, highly accessible location relative to other settlements, it naturally serves as an educational hub.The local ethnic education department plans to upgrade the facility into a formal middle school, provided that adequate school infrastructure can be secured. This grant provided new buildings and renovated existing buildings, to provide a safe learning environment for students.

South Asia$296k · 50% · 9 grants

Stated purpose: Anankdakshan Learning Center, India, a grant for operating expenses. Anandakshan Learning Space (ALLS) is a grammar school in India founded in 2014 by a group of middle-class families with the goal of providing a high-quality education with a non-traditional teaching philosophy to their children. BSI proposed and ALSS agreed to expand and adjust the enrollment at the school so that at least 25% of the students will be from underserved and less advantaged families. BSI's grant subsidizes the cost of enrolling students who are not able to pay the normal fees. The school currently has an enrollment of close to 200 students. · Cochlea Pune Hearing & Speech, India, a grant for operating costs. The organization helps children with severe hearing impairment. Cochlea Pune arranges for children born deaf (4 out of1,000 babies are born deaf) to be surgically fitted with a device wired into their brain, whereby the brain can "learn" what sounds mean. The grant was for the teaching of children (0-6 years old) who have the device need to have their brain trained to learn sounds that allow the child's brain to convert the signal so the child can understand the sounds as words and learn to speak understandably. Cochlea Pune provides a special and intensive training program for the child and a parent who are both trained and educated as partners over a 4-year period. The training program is full-time, all day for 5-days each week with a very high ratio of teachers to child-parent from one teacher to one child-parent up to one teacher for four student-parent participants. · Holistic Education Mission, India, (HEM) a grant for part of operating costs. HEM is a school that mainly serves the needs of 200-225 poor and orphan children, youth, women and the rural poor. HEM mainly works with the tribal "Dang" people spread around Dang, Valsad, Navsari, and Silvassa regions. Multiple tribes such as the Warli, Kunbi, and the Bhil call this region home, and are together knowns as Dangi's or Kukna's. These people are largely dependent on farming for their livelihood, now that the forests they depended on for their sustenance have disappeared. These are historically neglected people with high levels of illiteracy and limited outside help. Grant funds were used for the school's operations, including teacher salaries and classroom equipment including desks, books, whiteboards, etc.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its field
04the grantee network

1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/1
Grantees still filing
0/1
Grew since first funded

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPartners Asia: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Partners for Better Futures funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Partners for Better Futures. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Partners for Better Futures?

    Find your warmest path to Partners for Better Futures through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2026) is on record and reports $665k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2025, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Partners for Better Futures’ filings →

    More from the funding graph