Skip to content

California · Public charity

Park Lane Apartments Corporation

Owned and operated affordable rental housing.

$144k
Granted FY2019
1
Grants FY2019
1
Organizations funded FY2019
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2019
$143,716
Largest grant, FY2019
$143,716
States reached, FY2019
1

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2019, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Burbank Housing Development Corporation$143,71611%

Compare Park Lane Apartments Corporation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Park Lane Apartments Corporation?

Find your warmest path to Park Lane Apartments Corporation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Park Lane Apartments Corporation

How much does Park Lane Apartments Corporation give?
Park Lane Apartments Corporation reported 1 grants totaling $143,716 in its FY2019 IRS filing.
What does Park Lane Apartments Corporation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2019, its largest causes are Housing & Shelter (100%).
Who are Park Lane Apartments Corporation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2019: Burbank Housing Development Corporation ($144k).
Where is Park Lane Apartments Corporation based?
Park Lane Apartments Corporation is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph