Skip to content
Park L Loughlin Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Park L Loughlin Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Human Services$1.4MAnimals$1.3MYouth Development$650kArts & Culture$450kEnvironment$449kInternational$400kPhilanthropy$273kHealth$265kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $130k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $975k
$50,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$36M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Operation Recovery$200,000
Send-it Foundation$175,000
Adventure Risk Challenge$150,000
SPCA of Northern Nevada$100,000
Friends of Tahoe Truckee Waldorf School$75,000
Humane Society of Truckee Tahoe$75,000
Tahoe Truckee Community Foundation$50,000
Safe Embrace$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
Shakespeare Society of America$50,000
The Asher House$40,000
Community Foundation of Northern Nevada$40,000
Veterans Guest House$25,000
The Solace Tree$25,000
Philanthropy Roundtable$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Canine Companions for Independence: $100k → 9%Send-it Foundation: $175k → 11%Operation Recovery: $200k → 16%Operation Recovery: $200k → 16%Send-it Foundation: $100k → 11%Operation Recovery: $200k → 16%Send-it Foundation: $100k → 11%Gyros For Heroes Foundation: $200k → 16%Operation Recovery: $100k → 16%Send-it Foundation: $50k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
OR
NV
CA
MO
VA
MD
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of Park L Loughlin Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Park L Loughlin Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 10% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.7M · 17 repeat orgs$971k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
23

Total granted

$4.7M
$919k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+13%

Still filing today

88%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
AnimalsEnvironmentHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AR
    ADVENTURE RISK CHALLENGE
    4× · 2021–2024 · $600k · revenue +103%
  • SF
    SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OF NORTHERN NV
    4× · 2021–2024 · $450k · revenue +11%
  • SI
    SEND IT
    4× · 2021–2024 · $425k · revenue +213% · 25% of their budget

Funded once

  • CC
    CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +9%
  • TC
    Tahoe Cross Country Lodge Project
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • MA
    Mountain Area Preservation Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -30%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Sierra Fund

The Sierra Fund (TSF) is a non-profit organization with a mission to restore ecosystem and community resiliency in the Sierra Nevada.

Environment
2
Truckee Trails Foundation Inc

The Truckee Trails Foundation (TTF) is working towards a system of trails and bikeways in and around Truckee, California that will connect people and places, reduce our community's dependence on automobiles, and improve our physical,…

Environment
3
Tahoe Community Foundation

The Foundation envisions a thriving community created through meaningful philanthropy, inclusive communication, and the willingness to explore possibilities together.

Education
4
Sierra Nevada Alliance

To protect and restore sierra lands, water, wildlife and rural communities. to engage and support efforts to adopt exemplary local sustainable community actions accross the sierra nevada that balance social, economic and environmental…

Environment
5
Tahoe Institute for Natural Science

To advance the natural history, conservation and ecosystem knowledge of the Tahoe region through science, education and outreach.

Environment
6
Sierra State Parks Foundation

The Sierra State Parks Foundation provides critically needed financial and professional support to the Lake Tahoe-Donner Sierra State Parks for Education, Restoration, and Cultural and Environmental Preservation in partnership with…

Recreation & Sports
7
Nevada Humane Society

To care for pets, find them homes and save lives.

Animals
8
Sequoia Riverlands Trust

We conserve the lands and waters of California's heartland.

Environment
9
Truckee River Watershed Council

The truckee river watershed council was founded to implement locally developed public-private collaborative solutions to protect and improve water quality and biological resources for the sustainable environmental and economic health of…

Environment
10
Los Padres Forestwatch Inc

Los padres forestwatch protects the los padres national forest and the carrizo plain national monument through education, advocacy, and when necessary, legal action for the benefit of our communities, climate and future generations.

Environment
11
Northern California Regional Land Trust

The purpose of the organization is to monitor, manage, and preserve conservation easements it stewards in northern california. the organization acquires conservation easements in land exhibiting important natural features to protect and…

Environment
12
Sequoia Parks Conservancy

The sequoia parks conservancy funds and enables projects and programs that protect, preserve, and provide access to the natural and cultural resources of sequoia and kings canyon national parks.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tahoe Truckee Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Palisades Tahoe Community Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/36
Grantees still filing
24/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OF NORTHERN NV: $450,000 · OtherSOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO AN…Individual grant recipient: $265,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGANNA WALSKA LOTUSLAND: $200,000 · OtherGANNA WALSKA LOTUSLANDSHAKESPEARE SOCIETY OF AMERICA: $200,000 · OtherSHAKESPEARE SOCIETY OF AMERICAFriends of Tahoe Truckee Waldorf School: $150,000 · OtherFriends of Tahoe Truckee Waldorf SchoolSAFE EMBRACE: $200,000 · OtherSAFE EMBRACEBOLINAS MUSEUM: $120,000 · OtherBOLINAS MUSEUMPALISADES TAHOE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $75,000 · Other+17 more: $583,750 · Other+17 moreOPERATION RECOVERY INC: $900,000 · Human ServicesOPERATION RECOVERY INCSEND IT: $425,000 · Human ServicesSEND ITCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEP…ADVENTURE RISK CHALLENGE: $600,000 · Youth DevelopmentADVENTURE R…HUMANE SOCIETY OF TRUCKEE-TAHOE: $275,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOC…CANINE GUARDIANS ASSISTANCE DOGS: $150,000 · AnimalsCANINE GUA…THE ASHER HOUSE: $60,000 · AnimalsTHE ASHER …Joybound People and Pets FKA Tony La Russa's Animal Rescue Foundation: $50,000 · AnimalsJoybound P…NOWZAD DOGS NFP: $25,000 · AnimalsSpirit of America Worldwide: $400,000 · InternationalFIJI DENTAL AND MEDICAL FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 · InternationalTAHOE TRUCKEE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $100,000 · PhilanthropySHANE MCCONKEY FOUNDATION: $55,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MONO LAKE FOUNDATION: $50,000 · PhilanthropyStifel Charitable Inc: $50,000 · PhilanthropyCommunity Foundation of Northern Nevada: $40,000 · PhilanthropyEl Dorado Community Foundation: $25,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $2,500 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA WATERFOWL ASSOCIATION: $125,000 · EnvironmentTRUCKEE DONNER LAND TRUST: $50,000 · EnvironmentSIERRA WATCH: $50,000 · EnvironmentCLEAN UP THE CAYES dba CLEAN UP THE LAKE: $20,000 · Environment
Other$2,243,750Human Services$1,425,000Youth Development$600,000Animals$560,000International$440,000Philanthropy$322,500Environment$245,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOPERATION RECOVERY INC: $900,000 over 4y, 33% of budgetADVENTURE RISK CHALLENGE: $600,000 over 4y, 22% of budgetSOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OF NORTHERN NV: $450,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetSEND IT: $425,000 over 4y, 25% of budgetSpirit of America Worldwide: $400,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF TRUCKEE-TAHOE: $275,000 over 4y, 6.1% of budgetSAFE EMBRACE: $200,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetGANNA WALSKA LOTUSLAND: $200,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetSHAKESPEARE SOCIETY OF AMERICA: $200,000 over 3y, 83% of budgetCANINE GUARDIANS ASSISTANCE DOGS: $150,000 over 2y, 62% of budgetCALIFORNIA WATERFOWL ASSOCIATION: $125,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBOLINAS MUSEUM: $120,000 over 3y, 8.1% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTAHOE TRUCKEE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetPALISADES TAHOE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 2y, 50% of budgetTHE ASHER HOUSE: $60,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSHANE MCCONKEY FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetMountain Area Preservation Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetBREAD & ROSES PRESENTS: $50,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetJoybound People and Pets FKA Tony La Russa's Animal Rescue Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTRUCKEE DONNER LAND TRUST: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSIERRA WATCH: $50,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetUNITED STATES FOUNDATION FOR THE COMMEMORATION OF WORLD WARS: $50,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE MONO LAKE FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetStifel Charitable Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetACHIEVE TAHOE: $50,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCommunity Foundation of Northern Nevada: $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFIJI DENTAL AND MEDICAL FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 1y, 47% of budgetNATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION: $28,750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVeterans Guest House Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNOWZAD DOGS NFP: $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetEl Dorado Community Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOLACETREE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetCLEAN UP THE CAYES dba CLEAN UP THE LAKE: $20,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetTAHOE NORDIC SEARCH & RESCUE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetTHE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tahoe Community Found…Tahoe Truckee Communi…Marin Community Found…Martis Camp Community…The Corrigan-Walla Fo…Tahoe FundJewish Community Fede…Barbara L & Richard C…Community Foundation …Teichert FoundationThe Bessemer Giving F…The San Francisco Fou…
Tahoe Community FoundationNV29.9× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tahoe Community Foundation · Tahoe Truckee Community Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Martis Camp Community Foundation Dba Martis Camp Foundation · The Corrigan-Walla Foundation · Tahoe Fund · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Barbara L & Richard C Barrett Foundation · Community Foundation of Northern Nevada · Teichert Foundation · The Bessemer Giving Fund · The San Francisco Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Park L Loughlin Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Park L Loughlin Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Park L Loughlin Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Park L Loughlin Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Park L Loughlin’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home