Loading…
· Public charity
Park Cities Presbyterian Church
The organization's primary exempt purpose is to strategically fund gospel based initiatives.
$1.2M
Granted FY2019
16
Grants
6
Communities
$345k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 79% of Park Cities Presbyterian Church’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02FY2019 · 16 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2019
- $10k–50k7 grants · $157k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $625k
- $250k+1 grant · $345k
$60,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
- MICRO GROUP FUNDING$345,000
- ST JUDES PRES OAK CLIFF$117,677
- REDEEMER PRESBYTERIAN$110,000
- HOPE WOMENS CENTER$80,000
- CHALMERS CENTER$70,000
- REAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION$65,000
- EAST WEST MINISTRIES$62,000
- PARK CITIES PRESBYTERIAN CHUR$60,000
- NO CITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$60,000
- CAMPUS CRUSADE$45,000
- REFORMED UNIVERSITY MINISTRIE$30,000
- MISSION TO THE WORLD$20,000
- PARK CITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$20,000
- WORLD MAGAZINE$20,000
- DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY$11,700
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY18–19, $160k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5% — the area typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
69%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.8M · 10 repeat orgs$805k to everyone else
10 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2019, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
10
4
Total granted
$1.8M
$211k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+55%
+199%
Still filing today
40%
50%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2019, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $594k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
EducationHuman ServicesInternationalPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterReligionOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HWHOPE WOMENS CENTER2× · 2018–2019 · $160k · revenue +525%
- CCCHALMERS CENTER2× · 2018–2019 · $140k · revenue +58%
- RCREAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION2× · 2018–2019 · $115k · revenue +15%
Funded once
- RTREDEEMER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARYone grant, 2018 · $110k
- SPSHILOH PLACEgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $70k · revenue +199%
- MSMERCY STREET MINISTRYone grant, 2018 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Dallas Seminary Foundation
To support the mission of Dallas Theological Seminary by offering charitable planned giving and other related services to friends of the Seminary.
Education
2
Dallas International University
As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.
Education
3
Dallas Christian School
Private christian school education - preschool through high school.
Education
4
Regent University
Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.
—
5
Point Loma Nazarene University
Non-profit Christian university.
Education
6
Wesley Biblical Seminary
Wesley biblical seminary is a multi-denominational school of theology that provides undergraduate, graduate and doctorate level education for individuals who are preparing for christian service.
Education
7
Carolina College of Biblical Studies
Carolina college of biblical studies exists to disciple christ-followers, through biblical higher education, for a lifetime of effective servant leadership.
Education
8
Washington Prayer Coalition
to spread the gospel to the world by planting and serving churches, training local Christian leaders and to transform the world through prayer,
Religion
9
Reformed University Inc
Provide education in theology, divinity, religious education, ministerial training, business and organizational leadership.
Education
10
Christianity Today International
Equipping Christians to renew their minds, serve the church, and create culture to the glory of God
Religion
11
North Texas Christian Foundation
As the North Texas affiliate of the National Christian Foundation (NCF), our mission is to serve and encourage givers to grow as faithful stewards who give wisely to further the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
Philanthropy
12
Barclay College
To prepare students in a bible- centered environment for christian life, service, and leadership
Education
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dallas Baptist University and the most unlike its peers is Hope Womens Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$2,040,532Human Services$160,000International$140,000Philanthropy$115,000Housing & Shelter$70,000Religion$35,624Education$17,234
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Christian Community Foundation OfTN15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Of · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Gordon Christian Trust · Chattanooga Christian Community · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable · Servant Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation Park Cities Presbyterian Church funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: PARK CITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~11 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 3 filed years.
Track record & reputation
high risk
3 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.
Legal standing
medium risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 752896405 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on PARK CITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 11 months of cash on hand.
- FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 58% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Park Cities Presbyterian Church?
Find your warmest path to Park Cities Presbyterian Church through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines