Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Parish Episcopal School

Inspired by our values of wisdom, honor, and service, PARISH EPISCOPAL SCHOOL's inclusive episcopal community guides young people to become creative learners and bold leaders prepared to impact our complex global society.

$4.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232025.

Youth Development$20kHuman Services$20kEducation$10kHealth$10kCrime & Legal$10kEnvironment$10kFood & Nutrition$10k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 3 grants below total $30,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,737,791 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $4,707,791 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$105M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WINE TO WATER$10,000
MINNIE'S FOOD PANTRY$10,000
SECOND WIND DREAMS INC$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SECOND WIND DREAMS INC: $10k → 13%CITY SQUARE: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Dallas Momentum Foundation
Community Improvement
2
Youth With Faces

Our mission at Youth With Faces is to give justice-impacted youth the skills needed to break the cycle of incarceration and create positive futures. With respect and belief in their potential we give young people the opportunity to learn…

Philanthropy
3
Maia

MAIA is creating a generation of empowered leaders who have the knowledge and resources they need to lead choice-filled lives, break cycles of poverty, and ignite transformational change in their communities.

International
4
Green Careers Texas

Green Careers Texass mission is to disrupt poverty through green career training and employment, in combination with community education.By providing solar PV installation and safety training in the part of Dallas suffering the highest…

Environment
5
The Dignity Project

The dignity project exists to transform lives through a process of work, education, community, and faith by creating opportunities for individuals who are barely surviving in life to reach a higher level of purpose and social contribution.

Education
6
Opening Doors for Women in Need

Opening Doors for Women in Need is a faith-based nonprofit organization for created with the purpose to provide needed services for women who have experienced emotional trauma that has led to pain and suffering.

Human Services
7
Direct Action for Women Now World-Wide Inc Formerly Indias Daughters Inc
Philanthropy
8
VolunteerNow

VolunteerNow transforms lives through volunteers. As the hub of volunteerism in North Texas, and a national thought leader, VolunteerNow provides a wide range of programs and services to build capacity for nonprofit and community…

Philanthropy
9
Honis Coffee House

Honis Coffee House exists as a non-profit organization designed to transform the lives of impoverished children through a holistic approach using social business as our tool. We believe in breaking the cycle of poverty through spiritual,…

10
Together We Thrive

Together We Thrive aims to connect vulnerable homeless foster and sex-trafficked youth across North Texas with their community. We commit to walk beside these youth while helping them rewrite their future. We seek to replace labels of…

11
Mukti International

Mukti is a Sanskrit word that means "freedom from oppression and exploitation". Our goal is to see women and children find pathways to freedom. We partner with organizations around Asia that are on the frontlines helping to rescue and…

Crime & Legal
12
Dallas Alliance of Technology & Women

Dfw*atw is a vital non-profit organization committed to supporting the holistic eduction and professional journey for girls and women in technology while increasing the number of women in leadership.

Science & Tech

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Friends New Life and the most unlike its peers is Wine to Water. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CITYSQUARE — $10,000 · Human ServicesCITYSQUARESECOND WIND DREAMS INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesSECOND WIND DREAMS INCRAES HOPE INC — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentRAES HOPE INCCAFE MOMENTUM — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentCAFE MOMENTUMGRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · EducationGRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDAT…ASOCIACION KANTAYA INC — $10,000 · EducationASOCIACION KANTAYA INCMINNIES FOOD PANTRY INC — $10,000 · Food & NutritionMINNIES FOOD…Wine to Water — $10,000 · EnvironmentWine to Wate…NEW FRIENDS NEW LIFE — $10,000 · Crime & LegalNEW FRIENDS …
Human Services$20,000Youth Development$20,000Education$20,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Environment$10,000Crime & Legal$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCITYSQUARE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAES HOPE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetGRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetASOCIACION KANTAYA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetCAFE MOMENTUM — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNEW FRIENDS NEW LIFE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Parish Episcopal School funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph