Skip to content

· Private foundation

Panosian Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$74k
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$244kEducation$65kHuman Services$55kPhilanthropy$37kHealth$22kCommunity Improvement$5kEnvironment$4kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ELMIRA-CORNING AND THE FINGER LAKES INC$9,000
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$8,500
ST MARY OUR MOTHER SCHOOL$4,000
FAMILY LIFE NETWORK$4,000
UNITED BAPTIST CHURCH$4,000
NOTRE DAME HIGH SCHOOL$4,000
PINE CITY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$4,000
MOST HOLY NAME OF JESUS PARISH$3,500
VICTORY HIGHWAY WESLEYAN CHURCH - PAINTED POST$3,500
SALVATION ARMY$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
HIGHER HOPE CHURCH$2,000
MONUMENTAL BAPTIST CHURCH$2,000
ST MARY OUR MOTHER CHURCH$2,000
NORTH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSFORMATION CENTER: $2k → 15%NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSFORMATION CENTER: $2k → 15%NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSFORMATION CENTER: $2k → 15%NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSFORMATION CENTER: $1k → 15%NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSFORMATION CENTER: $1k → 15%NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSFORMATION CENTER: $1k → 15%NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSFORMATION CENTER: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$487k · 58 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

58 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2025, 30 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

58
7

Total granted

$487k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
0%

Still filing today

10%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    THE POTTERS HANDS FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $11k · revenue +57%
  • NT
    NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSFORMATION CENTER
    7× · 2017–2023 · $10k · revenue +45%
  • AO
    ARNOT OGDEN MEDICAL CENTER
    3× · 2023–2025 · $3k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • RH
    RENOVATION HOUSE - SPENCER
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • MO
    MOSAIC OF THE SOUTHERN TIER INC
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ira Davenport Memorial Hospital Inc

Ira davenport memorial hospital is dedicated to enhancing the quality of life within their rural community by providing local high quality primary, acute, restorative and residential health services.

Health
2
Cornwall Manor

Cornwall manor offers diversified and high quality housing, health care and related services for individuals to achieve a retirement and aging lifestyle they find fulfilling in a secure, caring and christian environment.

Human Services
3
Mosaic Health Inc

Improve the health status of those who experience financial and other barriers to accessing health care through direct patient care, collaboration, advocacy, and direct funding.

Health
4
Jewish Home of Central New York Inc

Jewish home's mission is to assure maximum independence and dignity offering a broad range of the highest quality of health, residential and community services. menorah park is committed to maintaining jewish values and traditions.

—
5
Central New York Adult Homes Inc

Provides residential adult care for facility occupants who are unable to live independently.

—
6
Cayuga-Syracuse Presbytery Home for the Elderly Inc Dba Westminster Manor

To provide a comfortable, caring environment ministering to the body, mind and spirit of our residents.

Human Services
7
Jewish Home of Central New York Senior Apartments Inc

Jewish home of central new york senior apartment's mission is to assure maximum independence and dignity offering a broad range of the highest quality of health, residential and community services. jewish home of central new york senior…

Housing & Shelter
8
Brothers of Mercy Nursing Home Company Inc

To provide skilled nursing care and rehabilitation services to the elderly and community

—
9
Hospice & Palliative Care Inc

To provide end of life care, bereavement counseling and spiritual services to the terminally ill and their families in oneida, herkimer, and eastern madison counties, new york.

—
10
St Josephs Hospital

Ministers to inpatients and outpatients, serving a primary care and specialty referral center for people from all faiths living in chemung county and the surrounding counties of new york and pennsylvania

—
11
St Camillus Residential Health Care Facility

St. camillus is a residential healthcare facility dedicated to caring for life through a broad range of healthcare services. the organization operates a 284 bed skilled nursing facility which includes a 20 bed unit dedicated to traumatic…

—
12
Schoellkopf Health Center Inc

Skilled nursing facility providing long-term healthcare services to residents

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Elmira-Corning and the Finger Lakes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mosaic of the Southern Tier Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $27,000 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCHUNITED BAPTIST CHURCH: $27,000 · OtherUNITED BAPTIST CHURCHNOTRE DAME HIGH SCHOOL: $26,000 · OtherNOTRE DAME HIGH SCHOOLST MARY OUR MOTHER: $25,500 · OtherST MARY OUR MOTHERFAMILY LIFE NETWORK: $23,000 · OtherVICTORY HIGHWAY CHURCH: $22,000 · OtherPINE CITY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $20,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY: $19,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $19,000 · Other+52 more: $261,000 · Other+52 moreCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ELMIRA-CORNING AND THE FINGER LAKES INC: $45,500 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY F…THE POTTERS HANDS FOUNDATION INC: $10,500 · PhilanthropyTHE POTTERS…NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSFORMATION CENTER: $9,500 · Human ServicesARNOT OGDEN MEDICAL CENTER: $3,000 · HealthMOSAIC OF THE SOUTHERN TIER INC: $2,000 · HealthELMIRA COLLEGE: $2,000 · Education
Other$470,000Philanthropy$56,000Human Services$9,500Health$5,000Education$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ELMIRA-CORNING AND THE FINGER LAKES INC: $45,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHE GOLDEN KEY PRISON MINISTRY: $11,000 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetTHE POTTERS HANDS FOUNDATION INC: $10,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD TRANSFORMATION CENTER: $9,500 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetARNOT OGDEN MEDICAL CENTER: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetELMIRA COLLEGE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOSAIC OF THE SOUTHERN TIER INC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCAREFIRST NY INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ELMIRA-CORNING AND THE FINGER LAKES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GOLDEN KEY PRISON MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds THE POTTERS HANDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSFORMATION CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Douglas G Anderson Leigh R Evans FoundationNY15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Douglas G Anderson Leigh R Evans Foundation · The Hilliard Foundation Inc · United Way of the Southern Tier Inc · Community Foundation of Elmira-Corning and the Finger Lakes Inc · JM McDonald Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Panosian Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Panosian Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Panosian Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph