Skip to content

· Private foundation

Palmer Home Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$346k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$977kFood & Nutrition$495kHealth$273kHousing & Shelter$180kReligion$32kEducation$2k
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $271k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$23,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOOD BANK OF DE$55,000
MODERN MATURITY SENIOR CE$45,000
FREDERICA SENIOR CENTER$35,000
HARVEST YEARS SENIOR CENT$27,000
DELAWARE HOSPICE$25,000
CENTRAL DEL HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$25,000
HARRINGTON SENIOR CENTER$25,000
MILFORD SENIOR CENTER$23,000
MILFORD HOUSING DEVELOPMENT$20,000
LILLIAN SMITH SENIOR CENTER$19,000
SALVATION ARMY$15,000
EDUCATION HEALTH & RESEARCH INT'L$12,000
MAMIE A WARREN SENIOR CENTER$7,500
ORCHARD CHURCH$7,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $777k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HARRINGTON SENIOR CENTER: $25k → 11%FREDERICA SENIOR CENTER: $35k → 11%HARRINGTON SENIOR CENTER: $25k → 11%FREDERICA SENIOR CENTER: $35k → 11%HARRINGTON SENIOR CENTER: $25k → 11%FREDERICA SENIOR CENTER: $35k → 11%HARRINGTON SENIOR CENTER: $25k → 11%FREDERICA SENIOR CENTER: $30k → 11%HARRINGTON SENIOR CENTER: $25k → 11%FREDERICA SENIOR CENTER: $30k → 11%HARRINGTON SENIOR CENTER: $20k → 11%FREDERICA SENIOR CENTER: $20k → 11%DELAWARE HOSPICE: $36k → 11%DELAWARE HOSPICE: $36k → 11%DELAWARE HOSPICE: $36k → 11%DELAWARE HOSPICE: $36k → 11%DELAWARE HOSPICE: $35k → 11%DELAWARE HOSPICE: $25k → 11%MAMIE A WARREN SENIOR CENTER: $25k → 11%MAMIE A WARREN SENIOR CENTER: $8k → 11%MAMIE A WARREN SENIOR CENTER: $8k → 11%MAMIE A WARREN SENIOR CENTER: $6k → 11%MAMIE A WARREN SENIOR CENTER: $5k → 11%MAMIE A WARREN SENIOR CENTER: $5k → 11%HARVEST YEARS SENIOR CENT: $35k → 11%HARVEST YEARS SENIOR CENT: $35k → 11%HARVEST YEARS SENIOR CENT: $32k → 11%HARVEST YEARS SENIOR CENT: $30k → 11%HARVEST YEARS SENIOR CENT: $28k → 11%HARVEST YEARS SENIOR CENT: $27k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 20 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against -47% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
2

Total granted

$2.0M
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
-47%

Still filing today

65%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $310k · revenue +31%
  • HY
    HARVEST YEARS SENIOR CENTER INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $187k · revenue +27%
  • FS
    FREDERICA SENIOR CENTER INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $185k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • WC
    WESLEY COLLEGE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue -47%
  • CC
    CANCER CUPPORT COMMUNITY OF DE
    one grant, 2024 · $750
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hartford Retirement Village Inc

None

Human Services
2
Warren Senior Center

Community senior centerprovide meals to senior citizens & homebound citizens

Human Services
3
Indian River Senior Center Inc

To provide social, educational, recreational, physical and emotional support and entertainment to seniors.

—
4
Middletown Senior Center Inc

This multi-functional senior center serves meals to seniors and handicapped, transports the elderly and frail to doctors, holds blood preasure clinics, and recreation.

Human Services
5
Adult Care Center of Central Virginia Inc

Adult day care for frail older adults, particularly those suffering from some form of dementia.

—
6
Fentress County Senior Center

Provide senior center operations including health education, recreation, information and assistance,visitation, outreach and other community awareness

—
7
Senior Citizens Center Inc

To enrich and strengthen the lives of active older adults in their life's journey.

—
8
Daniel D Cantor Senior Center Inc

The organization provides services for the elderly including programs for alzheimer patients and day care services for senior citizens

Human Services
9
Hillsdale County Senior Services Center Inc

To support and promote a means for maintaining a senior center in order to achieve specific goals, based on the needs and interests of older persons, those 50 and older except for those programs that receive state and federal funding which…

Human Services
10
Wilmington Senior Center

Wilmington senior center provides life-sustaining and life-enriching services, opportunities, and partnerships that have a positive impact on older adults' physical, mental, and social well-being and that contribute to future generations.

Human Services
11
Generations Home Care Inc

Commitment to delivering exceptional client service to nurture independence, improve quality of life for aging and disabled, help this population with the highest level of professional home health care as an alternative to higher cost…

Health
12
The Senior Center Inc

To provide a family centered environment and include programs and activites that promote a healthy lifestyle for children, adults, and senior citizens

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Milford Senior Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Education Health and Research International Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DELAWARE HOSPICE INC: $204,000 · Human ServicesDELAWARE HOSPICE INCHARVEST YEARS SENIOR CENTER INC: $187,000 · Human ServicesHARVEST YEARS SENIOR CENTER INCFREDERICA SENIOR CENTER INC: $185,000 · Human ServicesFREDERICA SENIOR CENTER INCHARRINGTON SENIOR CENTER INC: $145,000 · Human ServicesHARRINGTON SENIOR CENTER INCMAMIE A WARREN SENIOR CENTER INC: $56,000 · Human ServicesMAMIE A WARREN SENIOR CENTER INCMODERN MATURITY SENIOR CE: $281,400 · OtherMODERN MATURITY SENIOR CELILLIAN SMITH SENIOR CENTER: $119,653 · OtherLILLIAN SMITH SENIOR CENTERMILFORD SENIOR CENTER INC: $88,000 · OtherMILFORD SENIOR CENTER INCTHE SALVATION ARMY: $67,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYCENTRAL DEL HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $40,000 · OtherCENTRAL DEL HABITAT FOR HUMANITYORCHARD CHURCH: $32,000 · OtherYMCA CENTRAL DELAWARE: $23,200 · Other+4 more: $21,914 · OtherFOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC: $310,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF DELA…MILFORD HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP: $125,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE ARC OF DELAWARE INC: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterEDUCATION HEALTH AND RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL INC: $24,000 · HealthHOPE WELLNESS CENTER INC: $24,000 · HealthCANCER CARE CONNECTION: $10,500 · Health
Human Services$777,000Other$673,167Food & Nutrition$310,000Housing & Shelter$140,000Health$58,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC: $310,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetDELAWARE HOSPICE INC: $204,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHARVEST YEARS SENIOR CENTER INC: $187,000 over 6y, 13% of budgetFREDERICA SENIOR CENTER INC: $185,000 over 6y, 7.1% of budgetHARRINGTON SENIOR CENTER INC: $145,000 over 6y, 5.6% of budgetMILFORD HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP: $125,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetLILLIAN SMITH SENIOR CENTER: $119,653 over 6y, 13% of budgetMILFORD SENIOR CENTER INC: $88,000 over 6y, 3.2% of budgetMAMIE A WARREN SENIOR CENTER INC: $56,000 over 6y, 6.5% of budgetEDUCATION HEALTH AND RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL INC: $24,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetHOPE WELLNESS CENTER INC: $24,000 over 4y, 7.3% of budgetTHE ARC OF DELAWARE INC: $15,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetCANCER CARE CONNECTION: $10,500 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetWESLEY COLLEGE INC: $1,529 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC ↗
  • Who funds DELAWARE HOSPICE INC ↗
  • Who funds HARVEST YEARS SENIOR CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FREDERICA SENIOR CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HARRINGTON SENIOR CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MILFORD HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
  • Who funds LILLIAN SMITH SENIOR CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MILFORD SENIOR CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MAMIE A WARREN SENIOR CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATION HEALTH AND RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE WELLNESS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF DELAWARE INC ↗
  • Who funds CANCER CARE CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds WESLEY COLLEGE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Delaware Community Foundation IncDE21.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Delaware Community Foundation Inc · Longwood Foundation Inc · The Mid-Del Charitable Foundation · Crestlea Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Palmer Home Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Palmer Home Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 43%
  • Education Health and Research International Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Mamie a Warren Senior Center Inc: 65% of income from government
  • Cancer Care Connection: 48% of income from government
  • Harvest Years Senior Center Inc: 44% of income from government
  • Frederica Senior Center Inc: 43% of income from government
  • Milford Senior Center Inc: 42% of income from government
  • Harrington Senior Center Inc: 42% of income from government
  • Food Bank of Delaware Inc: 26% of income from government
  • Delaware Hospice Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Hope Wellness Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Palmer Home Inc?

Find your warmest path to Palmer Home Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Palmer Home’s filings →

More from the funding graph