Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pallottine Foundation of Buckhannon West Virginia

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$117k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$435kHealth$238kFood & Nutrition$201kEducation$83kScience & Tech$66kPublic Safety & Disaster$61kCommunity Improvement$33kCrime & Legal$32kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $104k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$7,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$12,800
WEST VIRGINIA ALLIANCE FOR CREATIVE HEALTH SOLUTIONS$9,000
UPSHUR PARISH HOUSE$8,250
YOUTH HEALTH SERVICE INC$8,108
THE COMMITTEE ON AGING FOR RANDOLPH COUNTY$8,000
WONDER & GROW MINDFUL NATURE EXPERIENCE INC$7,950
ONE UNIQUE RECOVERY HOUSE INC$7,723
CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA$7,000
ELKINS UNITED CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY CENTER$7,000
UPSHUR-BUCKHANNON HEALTH DEPARTMENT$6,000
MID OHIO VALLEY REGIONAL COUNCIL$6,000
BARBOUR COUNTY SENIOR CENTER INC$5,656
WEST VIRGINIA CARING - HOSPICE CARE CORPORATION$4,500
TYRAND COOPERATIVE MINISTRIES INC$4,500
MEALS ON WHEELS OF RANDOLPH COUNTY$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $301k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 72% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA: $11k → 15%NEW VISION RENEWABLE ENERGY: $6k → 15%TUCKER COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK: $4k → 16%TYRAND COOPERATIVE MINISTRIES INC: $5k → 17%LEWIS COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK: $17k → 18%NICHOLAS COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK: $8k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA: $10k → 15%WOMEN'S AID IN CRISIS INC: $20k → 17%LEWIS COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER INC: $8k → 18%NICHOLAS COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK: $6k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES WV: $10k → 15%WOMEN'S AID IN CRISIS INC: $15k → 17%LEWIS COUNTY SENIOR CENTER: $7k → 18%NICHOLAS COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK: $2k → 19%HEART AND HAND HOUSE INC: $11k → 20%CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA: $10k → 15%LEWIS COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK: $6k → 18%CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA: $8k → 15%LEWIS COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER: $5k → 18%HEART AND HAND HOUSE INC: $7k → 20%CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA: $8k → 15%THE COMMITTEE ON AGING FOR RANDOLPH COUNTY: $10k → 17%LEWIS COUNTY SENIOR CENTER: $5k → 18%HEART AND HAND HOUSE: $7k → 20%CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA: $7k → 15%THE COMMITTEE ON AGING FOR RANDOLPH COUNTY: $10k → 17%LEWIS COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER INC: $3k → 18%CATHOLIC CHARITIES WV: $6k → 15%COMMITTEE ON AGING FOR RANDOLPH COUNTY: $10k → 17%LEWIS COUNTY SENIOR CENTER: $3k → 18%NEW VISION RENEWABLE ENERGY: $3k → 20%CATHOLIC CHARITIES WV: $6k → 15%YOUTH HEALTH SERVICE INC: $8k → 17%THE COMMITTEE ON AGING FOR RANDOLPH COUNTY: $8k → 17%THE COMMITTEE ON AGING FOR RANDOLPH COUNTY: $8k → 17%THE COMMITTEE ON AGING FOR RANDOLPH COUNTY: $8k → 17%COMMITTEE ON AGING FOR RANDOLPH COUNTY: $5k → 17%COMMITTEE FOR AGING FOR RANDOLPH COUNTY: $5k → 17%COMMITTEE FOR AGING FOR RANDOLPH COUNTY: $5k → 17%YOUTH HEALTH SERVICES: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$878k · 29 repeat orgs$336k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
28

Total granted

$878k
$300k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+15%

Still filing today

66%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionEducationCommunity ImprovementEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    MOUNTAINEER FOOD BANK INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $130k · revenue +119%
  • TC
    The Committee on Aging for Randolph County Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $68k · revenue +13%
  • MU
    MARSHALL UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION
    2× · 2017–2019 · $66k · revenue +94%

Funded once

  • WV
    WEST VIRGINIA LOCAL HEALTH INC
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue -88%
  • HB
    HEALTHY BODIES HEALTHY SPIRITS
    one grant, 2017 · $22k
  • WV
    WEST VIRGINIA VOLUNTARY ORGANIZATIONS ACTIVE IN DISASTER
    one grant, 2020 · $21k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
West Virginia Community Voices Inc

To improve the health and health care quality for the residents of west virginia.

—
2
West Virginia Health Improvement Institute Inc

The wvhii is a statewide collaboration among multiple stakeholders focusing on improving the health and health care of the citizens of west virginia.

Health
3
Wv Helping Hands
Human Services
4
Wayne County Community Services Organization

Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv

Community Improvement
5
West Virginia Rural Water Association Inc

The organization provides training and technical assistance to water and wastewater utility providers throughout the State of West Virginia through a variety of programs.

—
6
Central West Virginia Aging Services Inc

Provide homemaker and case management services to home-bound seniors and disabled members in west virginia. provide, also, training and job assistance to those 55 and older on a limited income.

Human Services
7
Wirt County Health Services Association Inc

Provision of primary and preventive care services to the rural population of wirt, jackson, and wood counties in west virginia and the surrounding areas.

Health
8
McDowell County Commission on Aging Inc

To provide services to senior citizens of McDowell County, West Virginia.

Human Services
9
Tyler County Family Resource Network Inc

To serve as the primary planning and coordinating body to promote

Human Services
10
Southwest Virginia Community Health Systems Inc

Provide comprehensive primary medical care to the communites served.

Health
11
Rise Up Wv

The organization advocates for social welfare and political issues locally and nationally that benefit communities as a whole; such as healthcare availability, quality public education, fair wages, and secure retirement.

—
12
Mountainheart

Mountainheart community services, inc. provides services to the low income and elderly citizens of west virginia through head start, child care, right from the start, weatherization, birth to three and in-home care programs.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Virginia Local Health Inc; the most unlike its peers is One Unique Recovery House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
21/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MID OHIO VALLEY REGIONAL COUNCIL: $75,000 · OtherMID OHIO VALLEY REGIONAL COUNCILUPSHUR PARISH HOUSE: $72,900 · OtherUPSHUR PARISH HOUSEMOUNTAIN CAP OF WV - CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $36,430 · OtherMOUNTAIN CAP OF WV - CHILD ADVOCACY CENTERCENTERS AGAINST VIOLENCE: $22,000 · OtherHEALTHY BODIES HEALTHY SPIRITS: $22,000 · OtherWEST VIRGINIA VOLUNTARY ORGANIZATIONS ACTIVE IN DISASTER: $21,000 · OtherUPSHUR COUNTY SCHOOLS: $20,900 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $19,370 · Other+28 more: $212,096 · Other+28 moreCATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC: $74,547 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRG…The Committee on Aging for Randolph County Inc: $68,000 · Human ServicesThe Committee on Aging for R…WOMENS AID IN CRISIS INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesWOMENS AID IN CRISIS INCLewis County Senior Citizens Center Inc: $30,613 · Human ServicesLewis County Senior Citizens…HEART AND HAND HOUSE INC: $25,295 · Human ServicesHEART AND HAND HOUSE INCLEWIS COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE: $23,000 · Human ServicesLEWIS COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCENICHOLAS COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK INC: $16,060 · Human ServicesYOUTH HEALTH SERVICES INC: $10,364 · Human Services+4 more: $27,150 · Human Services+4 moreMOUNTAINEER FOOD BANK INC: $129,811 · Food & NutritionMOUNTAINEER F…West Virginia Food & Farm Coalition Inc: $8,967 · Food & NutritionWest Virginia…MEALS ON WHEELS OF RANDOLPH COUNTY INC: $6,500 · Food & NutritionWEST VIRGINIA LOCAL HEALTH INC: $50,000 · HealthWEST VIRGI…One Unique Recovery House Inc: $16,397 · HealthOne Unique…MILAN PUSKAR HEALTH RIGHT INC: $16,012 · HealthMILAN PUSK…WEBSTER CO FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK: $14,387 · HealthWEBSTER CO…WEST VIRGINIA ALLIANCE FOR CREATIVE HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC: $9,000 · HealthWEST VIRGI…MOUNTAIN HOSPICE INC: $4,900 · Health+1 more: $2,500 · HealthMARSHALL UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION: $65,598 · Community ImprovementWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $27,800 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR BETTER SCHOOLS IN UPSHUR COUNTY INC: $20,880 · Education+1 more: $1,353 · EducationHighland Community Builders Inc: $28,615 · Employment
Other$501,696Human Services$310,029Food & Nutrition$145,278Health$113,196Community Improvement$65,598Education$50,033Employment$28,615

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMOUNTAINEER FOOD BANK INC: $129,811 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC: $74,547 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetThe Committee on Aging for Randolph County Inc: $68,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetMARSHALL UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION: $65,598 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA LOCAL HEALTH INC: $50,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetWOMENS AID IN CRISIS INC: $35,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetLewis County Senior Citizens Center Inc: $30,613 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetHighland Community Builders Inc: $28,615 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $27,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEART AND HAND HOUSE INC: $25,295 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetLEWIS COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE: $23,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetOne Unique Recovery House Inc: $16,397 over 2y, 12% of budgetNICHOLAS COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK INC: $16,060 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetMILAN PUSKAR HEALTH RIGHT INC: $16,012 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBARBOUR COUNTY SENIOR CENTER INC: $15,656 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetYOUTH HEALTH SERVICES INC: $10,364 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMOUNTAIN CAP OF WEST VIRGINIA INC: $9,958 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNEW VISION RENEWABLE ENERGY INC: $9,650 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA ALLIANCE FOR CREATIVE HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC: $9,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetWest Virginia Food & Farm Coalition Inc: $8,967 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF RANDOLPH COUNTY INC: $6,500 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetSENECA HEALTH SERVICES INC: $5,025 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNTAIN HOSPICE INC: $4,900 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRANDOLPH COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $4,673 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTucker County Family Resource Network Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA RURAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA NONPROFIT ASSOCIATION INC: $2,221 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetYMCA of North Central West Virginia Inc: $2,119 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA WESLEYAN COLLEGE: $1,353 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MOUNTAINEER FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds The Committee on Aging for Randolph County Inc ↗
  • Who funds MARSHALL UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA LOCAL HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMENS AID IN CRISIS INC ↗
  • Who funds Lewis County Senior Citizens Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Highland Community Builders Inc ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HEART AND HAND HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds LEWIS COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR BETTER SCHOOLS IN UPSHUR COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds One Unique Recovery House Inc ↗
  • Who funds NICHOLAS COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds MILAN PUSKAR HEALTH RIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds BARBOUR COUNTY SENIOR CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WEBSTER CO FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN CAP OF WEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW VISION RENEWABLE ENERGY INC ↗
  • Who funds Libera Inc ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA ALLIANCE FOR CREATIVE HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds West Virginia Food & Farm Coalition Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Claude Worthington Benedum FoundationPA25.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Claude Worthington Benedum Foundation · The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · Bernard McDonough Foundation Inc · Pallottine Foundation of Huntington West Virginia · Tygart Valley United Way Inc · Sisters of St Joseph Charitable Fund Inc · Milan Puskar Foundation Inc · Encova Foundation of West Virginia · West Virginia University Research Corporation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · River Valley Child Development Services Services Inc · Phillips Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pallottine Foundation of Buckhannon West Virginia funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pallottine Foundation of Buckhannon West Virginia. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Pallottine Foundation of Buckhannon West Virginia?

    Find your warmest path to Pallottine Foundation of Buckhannon West Virginia through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pallottine Foundation of Buckhannon West Virginia’s filings →

    More from the funding graph