Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Pack Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$685k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$206k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Education$1.2MHuman Services$486kPublic Safety & Disaster$398kHealth$320kYouth Development$127kArts & Culture$97kSocial Science$83kFood & Nutrition$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $117k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $556k
$25,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMPANILE FOUNDATION$206,000
RED CROSS$130,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$120,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$100,000
SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK$25,000
OLD GLOBE THEATRE$25,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$25,000
HOME START$22,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS$10,000
POPULATION CONNECTION$10,000
ASPEN INSTITUTE$9,200
Individual grant recipient$2,013
SAE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $418k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CONNECT COMMUNITY: $10k → 26%CONNECT COMMUNITY: $10k → 26%RED CROSS: $130k → 14%RED CROSS: $110k → 14%RED CROSS: $40k → 14%RED CROSS: $40k → 14%RED CROSS: $40k → 14%RED CROSS: $25k → 14%RED CROSS: $8k → 14%RED CROSS: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 36% of Pack Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Pack Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 12 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +97% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
4

Total granted

$1.5M
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+97%
+39%

Still filing today

58%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesSocial ScienceCrime & LegalArts & CultureFood & NutritionEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    8× · 2018–2025 · $398k · revenue +9%
  • HS
    HOME START INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $126k · revenue +110%
  • OG
    OLD GLOBE THEATRE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $95k · revenue +101%

Funded once

  • WW
    WARREN WALKER EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • CC
    CIVIC CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • SA
    Sigma Alpha Epsilon Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +39%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
2
The Arc of San Diego

The arc of san diego supports and empowers persons with disabilities to achieve their life goals.

Human Services
3
Scripps Health

Founded in 1924 by philanthropist Ellen Browning Scripps, Scripps Health is a $4.9 billion, private not-for-profit integrated health system in San Diego, Ca. (see Sch O)

Health
4
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
5
Connect Foundation

Connect is an innovation instigator established to cultivate san diego's life science and tech communities. a trusted partner for more than 30 years, we propel our region's entrepreneurs as they create and scale their companies from…

Education
6
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

7
San Diego State University Foundation Sdsu Research Foundation

To support and further the research, education and community service objectives of san diego state university.

Education
8
Balboa Park Conservancy

Balboa Park Conservancy (the Conservancy) was organized on November 3, 1923. The Conservancy is the City of San Diegos (the City) partner and advocated for the greater good of Balboa Park (the Park). The Conservancy collaborated with and…

9
Associated Students of San Diego State University

To support the social, recreational, cultural and education programs and facilities, both on campus and in the community, and to advocate for student interests, provide leadership opportunities and participate in shared governance.

10
Compass Family Services

Compass family services helps homeless families and those at imminent risk to achieve housing stability, economic self-sufficiency, and well-being.

Human Services
11
The Urban Institute

The Urban Institute is a nonprofit research organization that drives impact by equipping changemakers with evidence and solutions to create a future where every person and community has the opportunity and power to thrive.

Social Science
12
Public Health Institute

Public health institute generates and promotes research, leadership and partnerships to build capacity for strong public health policy, programs, systems and practices.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jacobs & Cushman San Diego Food Bank and the most unlike its peers is Alpha Project for the Homeless. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE CAMPANILE FOUNDATION — $1,190,169 · EducationTHE CAMPANILE FOUNDATION+1 more — $1,000 · EducationTHE SALVATION ARMY — $360,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYPLANNED PARENTHOOD — $320,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS — $106,500 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS+7 more — $71,584 · Other+7 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $397,600 · Human ServicesAmerican Nationa…CONNECT COMMUNITY Inc — $20,000 · Human ServicesHOME START INC — $126,000 · Crime & LegalOLD GLOBE THEATRE — $95,000 · Arts & CultureTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $41,700 · Social SciencePOPULATION CONNECTION — $41,000 · Social ScienceJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK — $25,000 · Food & Nutrition
Education$1,191,169Other$858,084Human Services$417,600Crime & Legal$126,000Arts & Culture$95,000Social Science$82,700Food & Nutrition$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE CAMPANILE FOUNDATION — $1,190,169 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $397,600 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHOME START INC — $126,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetOLD GLOBE THEATRE — $95,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $41,700 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPOPULATION CONNECTION — $41,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECT COMMUNITY Inc — $20,000 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetALPHA PROJECT FOR THE HOMELESS — $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSigma Alpha Epsilon Foundation — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CAMPANILE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds HOME START INC
  • Who funds OLD GLOBE THEATRE
  • Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC
  • Who funds POPULATION CONNECTION
  • Who funds JACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK
  • Who funds CONNECT COMMUNITY Inc
  • Who funds ALPHA PROJECT FOR THE HOMELESS
  • Who funds Sigma Alpha Epsilon Foundation

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA9.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Pack Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Pack Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Pack Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph