Skip to content
Oshkosh Corporation Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Oshkosh Corporation Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
75
Grants FY2025still arriving
19
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Philanthropy$2.4MYouth Development$745kHuman Services$727kFood & Nutrition$480kCommunity Improvement$465kArts & Culture$299kHousing & Shelter$295kEducation$266kOther$0
02FY2025 · 75 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k47 grants · $228k
  • $10k–50k23 grants · $372k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $525k
$7,000
Median grant
19
States reached
$253k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Basic Needs Giving Partnership (US Venture)$200,000
Scholarship America Inc$124,500
Oshkosh Area United Way$100,000
Emergency Assistance Foundation Inc$50,000
Fox Cities Performing Arts Center$50,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OSHKOSH$40,000
Oshkosh Area Community Foundation$39,000
International Towing and Recovery Hall of Fame$30,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE FOX VALLEY INC$23,500
Oshkosh Area Community Pantry$20,000
United Way of Olmsted County$16,000
Children in Need Inc$15,000
St Joseph Food Program$15,000
RAWHIDE$15,000
United Way of Franklin County$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $463k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SEMCAC: $3k → 8%Big Brothers Big Sisters of Southern Minnesota: $8k → 9%Girls Who Code Inc: $4k → 17%HOOAH INC: $3k → 8%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS INC: $3k → 10%Emergency Assistance Foundation Inc: $25k → 11%ALPHA HOUSE PINELLAS COUNTY: $4k → 12%COMMUNITY STEPPING STONES INC: $3k → 13%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $10k → 14%Full Shelf Food Pantry: $4k → 6%Shield of Sisters Inc: $4k → 8%Operation Motorsport Program Foundation Inc: $4k → 8%FULTON COUNTY FAMILY PARTNERSHIP INC: $8k → 11%Upstate Warrior Solution Inc: $5k → 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $3k → 14%INTERCULTURAL MUTUAL ASSISTANCE ASSN OF SE MN: $8k → 9%FAMILY SERVICE ROCHESTER INC: $3k → 9%Children in Need Inc: $15k → 12%NOAHS HOUSE INC: $3k → 9%Children in Need Inc: $15k → 12%Children in Need Inc: $15k → 12%At the Cross Ministries: $4k → 9%CHILDREN IN NEED INC: $10k → 12%WOMEN'S SHELTER INC: $4k → 9%CHILDREN IN NEED INC: $10k → 12%OSHKOSH COMMUNITY YMCA: $15k → 11%CHILDREN IN NEED INC: $10k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE FOX VALLEY INC: $25k → 7%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE FOX VALLEY INC: $25k → 7%OSHKOSH COMMUNITY YMCA: $15k → 11%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE FOX VALLEY INC: $25k → 7%DAY BY DAY WARMING SHELTER INC: $13k → 11%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE FOX VALLEY INC: $25k → 7%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE FOX VALLEY INC: $24k → 7%DAY BY DAY WARMING SHELTER INC: $10k → 11%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE FOX VALLEY INC: $19k → 7%DAY BY DAY WARMING SHELTER INC: $10k → 11%DAY BY DAY WARMING SHELTER INC: $10k → 11%DAY BY DAY WARMING SHELTER INC: $10k → 11%Young Mens Christian Association: $7k → 11%Father Carr's Place 2B: $4k → 11%CHRISTINE ANN DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICES INC: $11k → 11%CHRISTINE ANN DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICES INC: $11k → 11%Jakes Diapers Inc: $9k → 11%CHRISTINE ANN DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICES INC: $8k → 11%YOUTH GO INC: $5k → 11%CHRISTINE ANN DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICES INC: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
OH
PA
CT
CA
UT
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
SC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 16% of Oshkosh Corporation Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Oshkosh Corporation Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.1M · 53 repeat orgs$632k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

53 repeat relationships: 35 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 39 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

53
105

Total granted

$4.1M
$430k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+9%

Still filing today

91%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $202k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyFood & NutritionAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OSHKOSH INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $260k · revenue +84%
  • FC
    FOX CITIES PERFORMING ARTS CENTER
    5× · 2020–2025 · $250k · revenue +58%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB FOX VALLEY INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $142k · revenue +251%

Funded once

  • NEW NORTH INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +62%
  • SC
    Samaritan Counseling
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • HH
    HARBOR HOUSE DOMESTIC ABUSE PROGRAMS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Goodwill Industries of South Central Wisconsin Inc

Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…

Employment
2
Homeward Bound Inc

Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.

Human Services
3
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
4
Family Promise of the Chippewa Valley Inc

Advocate for and support families who are homeless in our community by providing temporary housing and support services, and by fostering independence.

Human Services
5
Feeding South Dakota

To eliminate hunger in south dakota.

Food & Nutrition
6
Goodwill Industries of the Chesapeake Inc

Goodwill industries of the chesapeake, inc. prepares people to secure and retain employment and build successful, independent lives.

—
7
Wisconsin Family Ties Inc

Wisconsin family ties changes lives by improving children's mental health. it accomplishes this mission through a set of interrelated activities that support and educate parents, and inform practitioners, policy makers and the public about…

—
8
Wayside House Inc

Our mission is to break the cycle of addiction and trauma for women, children, and families.

—
9
Goodwill Industries of Northern Il and Wi Stateline Area Inc

The mission of goodwill is to create opportunities for individuals with barriers to enhance their lives. barriers include physical or mental disabilities, lack of education and job preparation, socio-economic disadvantages, and others.…

—
10
Foundation for the Homeless Inc

Empowering families and individuals experiencing homelessness to build a future filled with dignity, opportunity, and lasting solutions.

—
11
Goodwill Industries of North Central Wisconsin Inc

Eliminating barriers to employment by providing pathways for those who are underserved, underrepresented and disadvantaged who have a goal of building skills that lead to sustained employment and improved financial stability.

Human Services
12
Help of Door County Inc

The mission of help of door county, inc. is to eliminate domestic abuse through prevention and intervention services and to advocate for social change.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Health Care Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Justen Caris Memorial Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

154 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 154 of the 201 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
31
Early backer (in before they grew)
152/154
Grantees still filing
88/154
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OSHKOSH AREA UNITED WAY INC: $623,500 · OtherOSHKOSH AREA UNITED WAY INCBasic Needs Giving Partnership (US Venture): $450,000 · OtherBasic Needs Giving Partnership (US Ventu…Scholarship America Inc: $202,500 · OtherScholarship America Inc+120 more: $922,450 · Other+120 moreCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE FOX VALLEY REGION INC: $750,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE FOX …OSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION CORPORATION: $641,750 · PhilanthropyOSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION…UNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST MINNESOTA: $191,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST MINNESOTAUNITED WAY FOX CITIES INC: $100,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY FOX CITIES INC+10 more: $121,500 · Philanthropy+10 moreEMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC: $413,500 · Human ServicesEMERGENCY ASSIS…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB FOX VALLEY INC: $142,000 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CL…CHILDREN IN NEED INC: $75,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN IN NEE…DAY BY DAY SHELTER INC: $52,500 · Human ServicesDAY BY DAY SHEL…Oshkosh Community YMCA: $37,000 · Human ServicesCHRISTINE ANN DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICES INC: $34,500 · Human Services+23 more: $107,500 · Human Services+23 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OSHKOSH INC: $260,000 · Youth DevelopmentBig Brothers Big Sisters of Washington County Maryland Inc: $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS INCORPORATED OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF THE NORTHWESTERN GREAT LAKES INC: $30,000 · Youth Development+10 more: $57,750 · Youth DevelopmentOSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY PANTRY INC: $132,000 · Food & NutritionST JOSEPH FOOD PROGRAM INC: $115,000 · Food & NutritionCHANNEL ONE INC: $40,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC: $18,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF IOWA: $13,000 · Food & Nutrition+7 more: $41,500 · Food & NutritionFOX CITIES PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $250,000 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIONAL TOWING & RECOVERY HALL OF FAME & MUSEUM: $45,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $3,750 · Arts & CulturePILLARS INC: $63,500 · Housing & ShelterCOTS INC: $52,000 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OSHKOSHINC: $40,000 · Housing & ShelterGREATER FOX CITIES AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $10,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$2,198,450Philanthropy$1,804,250Human Services$862,000Youth Development$447,750Food & Nutrition$359,500Arts & Culture$298,750Housing & Shelter$165,500

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE FOX VALLEY REGION INC: $750,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetOSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION CORPORATION: $641,750 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetOSHKOSH AREA UNITED WAY INC: $623,500 over 6y, 8.2% of budgetEMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC: $413,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OSHKOSH INC: $260,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetFOX CITIES PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $250,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST MINNESOTA: $191,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB FOX VALLEY INC: $142,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetOSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY PANTRY INC: $132,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetST JOSEPH FOOD PROGRAM INC: $115,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetUNITED WAY FOX CITIES INC: $100,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDREN IN NEED INC: $75,000 over 6y, 4.9% of budgetPILLARS INC: $63,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EAST CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetUNITED WAY OF FRANKLIN COUNTY: $60,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetRAWHIDE INC: $58,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetDAY BY DAY SHELTER INC: $52,500 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetCOTS INC: $52,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL TOWING & RECOVERY HALL OF FAME & MUSEUM: $45,000 over 2y, 7.4% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters of Washington County Maryland Inc: $40,000 over 4y, 6.5% of budgetCHANNEL ONE INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OSHKOSHINC: $40,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetOshkosh Community YMCA: $37,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetREACH COUNSELING SERVICES INC: $35,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetRIVERVIEW GARDENS INC: $35,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetCHRISTINE ANN DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICES INC: $34,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $30,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF THE NORTHWESTERN GREAT LAKES INC: $30,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Way of Bedford County Inc: $20,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetRELIGIOUS EFFORT TO ASSIST AND CARE FOR THE HOMELESS INC (REACH): $20,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC: $18,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $15,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW NORTH INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER OF THE FOX VALLEY INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY SUNCOAST INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL FALLEN FIREFIGHTERS FOUNDATION: $14,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMORRISTOWN HAMBLEN CENTRAL SERVICES INC: $13,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFOOD BANK OF IOWA: $13,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWINNEBAGO AREA LITERACY COUNCIL INC: $10,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARBOR HOUSE DOMESTIC ABUSE PROGRAMS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF EAST TENNESSEE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER FOX CITIES AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

J J Keller Foundation…US Ventureschmidt Fam…Community Foundation …Theda and Tamblin Cla…Green Bay Packers Fou…Oshkosh Area Communit…Greater Green Bay Com…Basic Needs Giving Pa…Wisconsin Public Serv…Otto Bremer TrustUnited Way Fox Cities…The Clarence Wallace …
J J Keller Foundation IncWI81.7× affinity39 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: J J Keller Foundation Inc · US Ventureschmidt Family Foundation · Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region Inc · Theda and Tamblin Clark Smith Family Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Oshkosh Area Community Foundation Corporation · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · Basic Needs Giving Partnership Inc · Wisconsin Public Service Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · United Way Fox Cities Inc · The Clarence Wallace & Dolores Lynch Wallace Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Oshkosh Corporation Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Oshkosh Corporation Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • National Fallen Firefighters Foundation: 24% of income from government
  • Maslow Project: 22% of income from government
  • Alpha House of Pinellas County Inc: 12% of income from government
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Northeastern University: 7% of income from government
  • United Way Suncoast Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
56report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Oshkosh Corporation Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Oshkosh Corporation Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 201 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Oshkosh’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home