How much did OSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

OSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION reported 114 grants totaling $10,139,744 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is OSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION based?

OSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION is based in WI.

OSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Community foundation

OSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION

Receive & accept property to be administered for the benefit of the people & institutions serving our service area which includes winnebago county, waushara county, green lake county, and ripon, wisconsin.

$10M

Granted FY2024

114

Grants

Communities

$2.6M

Largest

01What you fund

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 43% of OSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

workingalsrfaartistsfurthermaintaindedicated

2020

creationresearchteachrfaartistsstrengtheningfurther

2021

preschoolcriticalnortheasternpharmacistsashpmedicationcollective

2022

dancevoicefosteringfvtcpharmacistsashpmedication

2023

radioautomobilefindingotherssamhsayoung scholarsdance

2024

personalizedfoster youthheadsupcreatedbarriersformer fosterhighest

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 114 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k26 grants · $190k
$10k–50k61 grants · $1.3M
$50k–250k21 grants · $2.0M
$250k+6 grants · $4.1M

$19,700

Median grant

States reached

$183M

Total assets

Largest grants

BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OSHKOSH INC$2,591,153
CITY OF OSHKOSH$439,070
EMMA WILLARD SCHOOL$269,000
LOURDES ACADEMY OF OSHKOSH WISCONSIN INC$264,212
NEENAH JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT$252,417
RIPON COLLEGE$252,000
OSHKOSH AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT$214,998
OSHKOSH COMMUNITY YMCA$182,083
OSHKOSH AREA HUMANE SOCIETY INC$137,278
CHRISTINE ANN DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICES INC$117,241
NOVA COUNSELING SERVICES$117,000
BASIC NEEDS GIVING PARTNERSHIP$116,958
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE TRI-COUNTY AREA$113,500
NEW DAWN RECOVERY SERVICES INC$100,000
OSHKOSH JAZZ FEST$95,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $3.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 10%. 77% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$35M · 151 repeat orgs$2.6M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.

151 repeat relationships — 94 still active in FY2024, 57 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

151

Total granted

$35M

$1.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%

+30%

Still filing today

69%

60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $961k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

BA
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF OSHKOSH INC
7× · 2018–2024 · $6.4M · revenue +54% · 37% of their budget
OC
OSHKOSH COMMUNITY YMCA
7× · 2018–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +52%
CA
CHRISTINE ANN DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICES INC
7× · 2018–2024 · $679k · revenue +148%

Funded once

OA
OSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY PROPERTY CORPORATION
one grant, 2022 · $455k · revenue -98% · 100% of their budget
CO
CITY OF RIPON
one grant, 2023 · $56k
WC
WINNEBAGO COUNTY HISTORICAL & ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY
one grant, 2022 · $51k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Oshkosh Area Community Foundation

Philanthropy

Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit

Pathways of Wisconsin Inc

Pathways of wisconsin provides day services and employment services including job development, training, and day-to-day support to consumers with developmental disabilities.

Human Services

Goodwill Industries of South Central

Help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services.

Employment

Disability Rights Wisconsin Inc

Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.

—

Westconsin Credit Union

To give members, communities, and one another the inspiration, resources, and support to achieve financial wellness.

—

Milwaukee Development Corporation

Regional economic development

Community Improvement

Wisconsin Manufacturing Extension

To provide targeted consulting services to small and medium manufacturers within our service territory in wisconsin.

Education

Wisconsin Medical Society Inc

To improve the health of the people of wisconsin by supporting and strengthening physicians' ability to practice high quality patient care in a changing environment.

—

United Way of Wisconsin Inc

To promote on a statewide basis the interests of the united way system and the voluntary sector, in order to maximize the capacity of local united ways to address human needs.

Philanthropy

Pharmacy Society of Wisconsin Inc

Provide a unified voice, resources, & leadership to advance the pharmacy profession in wi.

—

Innovative Services Inc

Innovative services, inc. (innovative care services) is made up of over 350 caring team members serving people with disabilities throughout wisconsin. innovative provides community supported living, residential care, and mental health care…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oshkosh Area United Way Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ripon College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.7%2/269

the rest of the field

1,482/16,583

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

186 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

178/186

Grantees still filing

143/186

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$18,624,880Youth Development$9,793,589Human Services$3,751,424Health$2,111,335Arts & Culture$1,516,889Housing & Shelter$1,126,287Education$988,653

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for the Fox ValleyWI146.6× affinity95 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for the Fox Valley · J J Keller Foundation Inc · United Way Fox Cities Inc · Greater Green Bay Community · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Theda and Tamblin Clark Smith Family · Jek Foundation Inc · US Ventureschmidt Family Foundation · Oshkosh Area United Way Inc · Oshkosh Corporation Foundation Inc · Basic Needs Giving Partnership Inc · The Boldt Family Fund Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation OSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

5get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: OSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY PROPERTY CORPORATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

3 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 272441813 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on OSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY PROPERTY CORPORATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 100% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Oshkosh Area Community Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Oshkosh Area Community Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

OSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

186 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Oshkosh Area Community Foundation?

More from the funding graph

OSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

186 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Oshkosh Area Community Foundation?

More from the funding graph