Skip to content

· Private foundation

Orrion and Edith Barger Memorial Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$425k
Granted FY2025still arriving
46
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$1.3MEducation$719kPublic Safety & Disaster$400kCommunity Improvement$386kReligion$131kHuman Services$122kHealth$85kPublic Benefit$83kOther$0
02FY2025 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k39 grants · $115k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $250k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$9.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHAMBERLAIN SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDAT$100,000
Individual grant recipient$75,000
CHAMBERLAIN OACOMA TRAILS COALITION$75,000
LAKE FRANCIS CASE ECONOMIC DEVELOPM$20,000
KIMBALL SCHOOL DISTRICT$20,000
HELPING ENDS MEET FOOD PROGRAM$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
CHAMBERLAIN-OACOMA CHAMBER OF COMME$5,250
Individual grant recipient$5,250
Individual grant recipient$5,000
JLS LOVE BIG PROJECT$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY$5,000
FISHING FOR A CURE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DIAMOND WILLOW MINISTRIES: $5k → 40%DAKOTA MILESTONES: $12k → 15%THE CHILDREN'S ARK: $10k → 15%THE CHILDRENS ARK: $8k → 15%THE CHILDREN'S ARK: $5k → 15%THE CHILDREN'S ARK: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 49 repeat orgs$396k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

49 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
41

Total granted

$3.2M
$286k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+18%

Still filing today

14%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $110k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementHuman ServicesHealthCrime & LegalInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LF
    LAKE FRANCIS CASE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    4× · 2019–2024 · $79k · revenue +8%
  • MV
    MISSOURI VALLEY CRISIS CENTER INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $44k · revenue +59%
  • TC
    The Children's Ark Inc
    4× · 2019–2024 · $28k · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • RV
    RELIANCE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT
    one grant, 2019 · $45k
  • CS
    CHAMBERLAIN SCHOOL DIST 7-1
    2× · 2017–2018 · $40k
  • GP
    GRANDVIEW PROPERTIES INC
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dickinson Area Chamber of Commerce

The dickinson area chamber of commerce will provide leadership to promote a progressive business environment.

—
2
North Dakota Natural Resources Trust
—
3
Cozad Development Corporation

Foster Business Development in Cozad, NE

—
4
Mitchell Area Development Corporation

Promote economic development in the mitchell, sd area

Community Improvement
5
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
6
Central Iowa Juvenile Detention Center

To provide a highly structured environment which emphasizes a safety and security to all juveniles while serving as a deterrent to criminal and anti-social behaviors. Working youth in the center and communities.

—
7
Watertown Development Company

Economic development in the watertown, south dakota area.

—
8
Children's Advocacy Centers of North Dakota

Provide training and services for child abuse response.

Human Services
9
Skamania County Chamber of Commerce

The mission and purpose of the skamania county chamber of commerce is to foster development of a healthy economic community through the support and promotion of businesses, chamber members and skamania county, washington as an exceptional…

—
10
Osage Community Daycare

Providing day care services to mitchell county, iowa, and the surrounding area. 50 to 70 children are serviced on a daily basis.

Human Services
11
Kasson Mantorville Nursery Group

Provider of early childhood education for preschool aged children and provider of daycare for infant through school aged children. the center is licensed for 75 children.

—
12
Garretson Volunteer Fire Department

The Garretson Volunteer Fire Department serves the City of Garretson and surrounding communities in Eastern South Dakota. The Department is made up completely of volunteer fireman and is responsible for roughly 100 square miles within its…

Public Safety & Disaster
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dakota Milestones Inc; the most unlike its peers is Matson Halverson Christiansen Hamilton Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 106 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $1,510,162 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHAMBERLAIN SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION: $357,000 · OtherCHAMBERLAIN SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATIONCITY OF KIMBALL: $160,142 · Other+93 more: $1,368,298 · Other+93 moreLAKE FRANCIS CASE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $79,000 · Community ImprovementMISSOURI VALLEY CRISIS CENTER INC: $43,800 · Community ImprovementCENTRAL DAKOTA DEVELOPMENT CORP: $13,500 · Community ImprovementMATSON HALVERSON CHRISTIANSEN HAMILTON FOUNDATION: $11,500 · Community ImprovementThe Children's Ark Inc: $28,000 · Human ServicesDAKOTA MILESTONES INC: $12,000 · Human ServicesDIAMOND WILLOW MINISTRIES: $5,000 · Human ServicesMISSOURI VALLEY AMBULANCE SERVICE: $23,000 · HealthFIRST CIRCUIT CASA: $12,300 · Crime & LegalJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH DAKOTA: $2,000 · International
Other$3,395,602Community Improvement$147,800Human Services$45,000Health$23,000Crime & Legal$12,300International$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLAKE FRANCIS CASE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $79,000 over 4y, 24% of budgetMISSOURI VALLEY CRISIS CENTER INC: $43,800 over 7y, 5.3% of budgetThe Children's Ark Inc: $28,000 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetMISSOURI VALLEY AMBULANCE SERVICE: $23,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetFIRST CIRCUIT CASA: $12,300 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetDAKOTA MILESTONES INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMATSON HALVERSON CHRISTIANSEN HAMILTON FOUNDATION: $11,500 over 1y, 16% of budgetCHAMBERLAIN-OACOMA AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $9,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetTREEHOUSE INC: $8,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetDIAMOND WILLOW MINISTRIES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEMBE: $2,320 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH DAKOTA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LAKE FRANCIS CASE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI VALLEY CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds The Children's Ark Inc ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI VALLEY AMBULANCE SERVICE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

South Dakota Community FoundationSD19.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: South Dakota Community Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Orrion and Edith Barger Memorial Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Orrion and Edith Barger Memorial Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Orrion and Edith Barger Memorial Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Orrion and Edith Barger Memorial Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 106 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Orrion and Edith Barger Memorial’s filings →

    More from the funding graph