· Public charity
Organizing Empowerment Project Inc
Organizing empowerment project (oep) is organized to increase civic engagement through activities focused on expanding the electorate and public participation in issue advocacy to build power in diverse communities that translates to improved quality of life.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k3 grants · $57k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $350k
- $250k+1 grant · $750k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RETIRE CAREER POLITICIANS | $750,000 |
| MICHIGAN CIVIC ACTION FUND | $200,000 |
| A BETTER BIG SKY | $100,000 |
| WORKER POWER INSTITUTE | $50,000 |
| ARIZONA STUDENT'S ASSOCIATION | $27,000 |
| POWER TO THE POLLS INC | $15,000 |
| WISDOM ACTION NETWORK INC | $15,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: America Votes · Sixteen Thirty Fund · Tides Foundation · All Hands on Deck Network Inc · Tides Advocacy
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Organizing Empowerment Project Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Organizing Empowerment Project Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Organizing Empowerment Project Inc?
Find your warmest path to Organizing Empowerment Project Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Organizing Empowerment Project’s filings →